Shen Megan Johnson, Dyson Robert C, D'Agostino Thomas A, Ostroff Jamie S, Dickler Maura N, Heerdt Alexandra S, Bylund Carma L
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Psychooncology. 2015 Nov;24(11):1439-47. doi: 10.1002/pon.3752. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
OBJECTIVE: Many patients with cancer search out information about their cancer on the internet, thus affecting their relationship with their oncologists. An in-depth analysis of patient-physician communication about information obtained from the internet is currently lacking. METHODS: We audio-recorded visits of patients with breast cancer and their oncologists where internet information was expected to be discussed. Inductive thematic text analysis was used to identify qualitative themes from these conversations. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients self-reported discussing cancer-related internet information (CRII) with their oncologists; 16 audio recordings contained detectable discussions of CRII and were analyzed. Results indicated that oncologists and patients initiated CRII discussions implicitly and explicitly. Oncologists responded positively to patient-initiated CRII discussions by (1) acknowledging their limited expertise/knowledge, (2) encouraging/approving using the internet as an information resource, (3) providing information/guidance on the proper use of internet searches, (4) discussing the pros and cons of relevant treatment options, or (5) giving information. Finally, patients reacted to the CRII discussions by (1) indicating that they only used reputable sources/websites, (2) asking for further explanation of information, (3) expressing continued concern, or (4) asking for the oncologist's opinion or recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the majority of patients introduce internet information implicitly, in order to guard against any threat to their self-esteem. Physicians, in turn, seem to respond in a supportive fashion to reduce any threat experienced. Future interventions may consider providing prescription-based guidance on how to navigate the internet as a health information resource and to encourage patients to bring these topics up with their oncologist.
目的:许多癌症患者在互联网上搜索有关其癌症的信息,从而影响他们与肿瘤学家的关系。目前缺乏对患者与医生就从互联网获取的信息进行的沟通的深入分析。 方法:我们对预计会讨论互联网信息的乳腺癌患者及其肿瘤学家的就诊过程进行了录音。采用归纳主题文本分析从这些对话中识别定性主题。 结果:21名患者自我报告与肿瘤学家讨论了癌症相关互联网信息(CRII);16份录音包含可检测到的CRII讨论并进行了分析。结果表明,肿瘤学家和患者以隐性和显性方式发起了CRII讨论。肿瘤学家对患者发起的CRII讨论做出了积极回应,方式包括:(1)承认自己专业知识/知识有限;(2)鼓励/认可将互联网用作信息资源;(3)提供关于正确使用互联网搜索的信息/指导;(4)讨论相关治疗方案的利弊;或(5)提供信息。最后,患者对CRII讨论的反应包括:(1)表示只使用了信誉良好的来源/网站;(2)要求对信息进行进一步解释;(3)表达持续的担忧;或(4)征求肿瘤学家的意见或建议。 结论:这些结果表明,大多数患者以隐性方式引入互联网信息,以防范对其自尊的任何威胁。反过来,医生似乎以支持性的方式做出回应,以减少所经历的任何威胁。未来的干预措施可能会考虑提供基于处方的指导,说明如何将互联网用作健康信息资源,并鼓励患者与肿瘤学家讨论这些话题。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019-1
J Med Internet Res. 2024-6-6
Support Care Cancer. 2024-5-17
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024-4-30
J Med Internet Res. 2023-8-4
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022-5-16
J Med Internet Res. 2020-1-10
Psychooncology. 2017-12-19
Palliat Support Care. 2015-4
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2010