Harston G W J, Rane N, Shaya G, Thandeswaran S, Cellerini M, Sheerin F, Kennedy J
From the Radcliffe Department of Medicine (G.W.J.H., G.S., S.T., J.K.), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Department of Neuroradiology (N.R., M.C., F.S.), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom Neurointervention Service (N.R.), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 May;36(5):839-43. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4208. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
Imaging biomarkers are increasingly used to provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of acute ischemic stroke. However, this approach of routinely using imaging biomarkers to inform treatment decisions has yet to be translated into successful randomized trials. The aim of this study was to systematically review the use of imaging biomarkers in randomized controlled trials in patients with acute ischemic stroke, exploring the purposes for which the imaging biomarkers were used.
We performed a systematic review of imaging biomarkers used in randomized controlled trials of acute ischemic stroke, in which a therapeutic intervention was trialed within 48 hours of symptom onset. Data bases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, strokecenter.org, and the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (1995-2014).
Eighty-four studies met the criteria, of which 49 used imaging to select patients; 31, for subgroup analysis; and 49, as an outcome measure. Imaging biomarkers were broadly used for 8 purposes. There was marked heterogeneity in the definitions and uses of imaging biomarkers and significant publication bias among post hoc analyses.
Imaging biomarkers offer the opportunity to refine the trial cohort by minimizing participant variation, to decrease sample size, and to personalize treatment approaches for those who stand to benefit most. However, within imaging modalities, there has been little consistency between stroke trials. Greater effort to prospectively use consistent imaging biomarkers should help improve the development of novel treatment strategies in acute stroke and improve comparison between studies.
影像生物标志物越来越多地用于更好地理解急性缺血性卒中的病理生理学。然而,这种常规使用影像生物标志物来指导治疗决策的方法尚未转化为成功的随机试验。本研究的目的是系统评价影像生物标志物在急性缺血性卒中患者随机对照试验中的应用,探讨使用影像生物标志物的目的。
我们对急性缺血性卒中随机对照试验中使用的影像生物标志物进行了系统评价,这些试验在症状发作后48小时内进行了治疗干预。检索的数据库包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、strokecenter.org和虚拟国际卒中试验档案库(1995 - 2014年)。
84项研究符合标准,其中49项使用影像来选择患者;31项用于亚组分析;49项作为结局指标。影像生物标志物广泛用于8个目的。影像生物标志物的定义和用途存在明显异质性,事后分析中存在显著的发表偏倚。
影像生物标志物提供了通过最小化参与者差异来优化试验队列、减少样本量以及为最有可能受益的患者个性化治疗方法的机会。然而,在影像模式中,卒中试验之间几乎没有一致性。更努力地前瞻性使用一致的影像生物标志物应有助于改善急性卒中新型治疗策略的开发,并改善研究之间的比较。