Suppr超能文献

评论:不当激励还是害群之马?

Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples?

作者信息

Bouter Lex M

机构信息

a Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics , VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Account Res. 2015;22(3):148-61. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.950253.

Abstract

Around 2% of the investigators admit to have falsified or fabricated data at least once. Also, 34% report to have been guilty to one or more questionable research practices, such as doing many statistical analyses and to publish only what fits their theoretical framework. Prevention of questionable research practices is very important. Universities should ensure that the training is in order and the research culture is adequate, and they should critically look at perverse incentives, such as a too high publication pressure, but also by ensuring proper guidelines, and by having a fair and transparent procedure for suspected violations of scientific integrity.

摘要

约2%的研究人员承认至少有过一次伪造或编造数据的行为。此外,34%的人报告称曾有过一种或多种有问题的研究行为,比如进行大量统计分析,却只发表符合其理论框架的内容。防止有问题的研究行为非常重要。大学应确保培训有序且研究文化适宜,应审慎看待不当激励措施,比如过高的发表压力,还要确保有适当的指导方针,以及针对涉嫌违反科研诚信行为制定公平透明的程序。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验