Liu Pei-Jun, Chen Chi-De, Wang Chih-Liang, Wu Yi-Cheng, Hsu Chia-Wei, Lee Chien-Wei, Huang Lien-Hung, Yu Jau-Song, Chang Yu-Sun, Wu Chih-Ching, Yu Chia-Jung
From the ‡Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences.
From the ‡Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, **Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan;
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015 Apr;14(4):917-32. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.045914. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
Pleural effusion (PE), a tumor-proximal body fluid, may be a promising source for biomarker discovery in human cancers. Because a variety of pathological conditions can lead to PE, characterization of the relative PE proteomic profiles from different types of PEs would accelerate discovery of potential PE biomarkers specifically used to diagnose pulmonary disorders. Using quantitative proteomic approaches, we identified 772 nonredundant proteins from six types of exudative PEs, including three malignant PEs (MPE, from lung, breast, and gastric cancers), one lung cancer paramalignant PE, and two benign diseases (tuberculosis and pneumonia). Spectral counting was utilized to semiquantify PE protein levels. Principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering, and Gene Ontology of cellular process analyses revealed differential levels and functional profiling of proteins in each type of PE. We identified 30 candidate proteins with twofold higher levels (q<0.05) in lung cancer MPEs than in the two benign PEs. Three potential markers, MET, DPP4, and PTPRF, were further verified by ELISA using 345 PE samples. The protein levels of these potential biomarkers were significantly higher in lung cancer MPE than in benign diseases or lung cancer paramalignant PE. The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve for three combined biomarkers in discriminating lung cancer MPE from benign diseases was 0.903. We also observed that the PE protein levels were more clearly discriminated in effusions in which the cytological examination was positive and that they would be useful in rescuing the false negative of cytological examination in diagnosis of nonsmall cell lung cancer-MPE. Western blotting analysis further demonstrated that MET overexpression in lung cancer cells would contribute to the elevation of soluble MET in MPE. Our results collectively demonstrate the utility of label-free quantitative proteomic approaches in establishing differential PE proteomes and provide a new database of proteins that can be used to facilitate identification of pulmonary disorder-related biomarkers.
胸腔积液(PE)是一种肿瘤近端体液,可能是发现人类癌症生物标志物的一个有前景的来源。由于多种病理状况可导致胸腔积液,对来自不同类型胸腔积液的相对蛋白质组学谱进行表征将加速发现专门用于诊断肺部疾病的潜在胸腔积液生物标志物。我们采用定量蛋白质组学方法,从六种渗出性胸腔积液中鉴定出772种非冗余蛋白质,包括三种恶性胸腔积液(MPE,分别来自肺癌、乳腺癌和胃癌)、一种肺癌旁恶性胸腔积液以及两种良性疾病(结核病和肺炎)。利用光谱计数对胸腔积液蛋白质水平进行半定量。主成分分析、层次聚类和细胞过程分析的基因本体论揭示了每种类型胸腔积液中蛋白质的差异水平和功能谱。我们鉴定出30种候选蛋白质,其在肺癌MPE中的水平比两种良性胸腔积液高两倍(q<0.05)。使用345份胸腔积液样本通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进一步验证了三种潜在标志物,即MET、二肽基肽酶4(DPP4)和蛋白酪氨酸磷酸酶受体F(PTPRF)。这些潜在生物标志物的蛋白质水平在肺癌MPE中显著高于良性疾病或肺癌旁恶性胸腔积液。三种联合生物标志物在区分肺癌MPE与良性疾病时的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.903。我们还观察到,在细胞学检查呈阳性的胸腔积液中,胸腔积液蛋白质水平的区分更清晰,并且它们有助于挽救非小细胞肺癌-MPE诊断中细胞学检查的假阴性结果。蛋白质免疫印迹分析进一步证明,肺癌细胞中MET的过表达将导致MPE中可溶性MET水平升高。我们的结果共同证明了无标记定量蛋白质组学方法在建立差异胸腔积液蛋白质组方面的实用性,并提供了一个新的蛋白质数据库,可用于促进肺部疾病相关生物标志物的鉴定。