Ogoh Shigehiko, Sato Kohei, Okazaki Kazunobu, Miyamoto Tadayoshi, Hirasawa Ai, Sadamoto Tomoko, Shibasaki Manabu
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Toyo University, Saitama, Japan.
Exp Physiol. 2015 Mar;100(3):259-66. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2014.083964. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
What is the central question of this study? Recently, the heterogeneity of the cerebral arterial circulation has been argued. Orthostatic tolerance may be associated with an orthostatic stress-induced change in blood flow in vertebral arteries rather than in internal carotid arteries, because vertebral arteries supply blood to the medulla oblongata, which is the location of important cardiac, vasomotor and respiratory control centres. What is the main finding and its importance? The effect of graded orthostatic stress on vertebral artery blood flow is different from that on internal carotid artery blood flow. This response allows for the possibility that orthostatic tolerance may be associated with haemodynamic changes in posterior rather than anterior cerebral blood flow. Recently, the heterogeneity of the cerebral arterial circulation has been argued, but the characteristics of vertebral artery (VA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow during graded orthostatic stress remain unknown. We hypothesized that the change in blood flow in VA is not similar to that in ICA blood flow during graded orthostatic stress. We measured blood flows in both ICA and VA during graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP; -20, -35 and -50 mmHg) by using two colour-coded ultrasound systems. The effect of graded orthostatic stress on the VA blood flow was different from that on the ICA blood flow (LBNP × artery, P = 0.006). The change in ICA blood flow was associated with the level of LBNP (r = 0.287, P = 0.029), and a reduction in ICA blood flow from pre-LBNP was observed during -50 mmHg LBNP (from 411 ± 35 to 311 ± 40 ml min(-1) , P = 0.044) without symptoms of presyncope. In contrast, VA blood flow was unchanged during graded LBNP compared with the baseline (P = 0.597) relative to the reduction in ICA blood flow and thus there was no relationship between VA blood flow and the level of LBNP (r = 0.167, P = 0.219). These findings suggest that the change in ICA blood flow is due to the level of LBNP during graded orthostatic stress, but the change in VA blood flow is different from that in ICA blood flow across the different levels of LBNP. These findings provide the possibility that posterior cerebral blood flow decreases only during severe orthostatic stress and is therefore more likely to be linked with orthostatic tolerance.
本研究的核心问题是什么?最近,有人提出脑动脉循环存在异质性。直立耐受可能与直立应激诱导的椎动脉而非颈内动脉血流变化有关,因为椎动脉为延髓供血,而延髓是重要的心脏、血管运动和呼吸控制中心所在位置。主要发现及其重要性是什么?分级直立应激对椎动脉血流的影响不同于对颈内动脉血流的影响。这种反应使得直立耐受可能与大脑后循环而非前循环的血流动力学变化相关这一可能性存在。最近,有人提出脑动脉循环存在异质性,但分级直立应激期间椎动脉(VA)和颈内动脉(ICA)血流的特征仍不清楚。我们假设在分级直立应激期间,VA血流变化与ICA血流变化不同。我们使用两个彩色编码超声系统在分级下体负压(LBNP;-20、-35和-50mmHg)期间测量了ICA和VA的血流。分级直立应激对VA血流的影响不同于对ICA血流的影响(LBNP×动脉,P = 0.006)。ICA血流变化与LBNP水平相关(r = 0.287,P = 0.029),并且在-50mmHg LBNP期间观察到ICA血流较LBNP前减少(从411±35降至311±40ml·min⁻¹,P = 0.044),且无晕厥前期症状。相比之下,与基线相比,分级LBNP期间VA血流无变化(P = 0.597),相对于ICA血流减少而言,因此VA血流与LBNP水平之间无相关性(r = 0.167,P = 0.219)。这些发现表明,在分级直立应激期间,ICA血流变化是由于LBNP水平所致,但VA血流变化与不同LBNP水平下的ICA血流变化不同。这些发现提示大脑后循环血流仅在严重直立应激期间减少,因此更有可能与直立耐受相关。