Suppr超能文献

电肌肉刺激对脑血流的影响。

Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow.

机构信息

Graduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo, 182-8585, Japan.

Faculty of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo, 182-8585, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Neurosci. 2021 Nov 14;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12868-021-00670-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) induces involuntary muscle contraction. Several studies have suggested that EMS has the potential to be an alternative method of voluntary exercise; however, its effects on cerebral blood flow (CBF) when applied to large lower limb muscles are poorly understood. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of EMS on CBF, focusing on whether the effects differ between the internal carotid (ICA) and vertebral (VA) arteries.

METHODS

The participants performed the experiments under EMS and control (rest) conditions in a randomized crossover design. The ICA and VA blood flow were measured before and during EMS or control. Heart rate, blood pressure, minute ventilation, oxygen uptake, and end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO) were monitored and measured as well.

RESULTS

The ICA blood flow increased during EMS [Pre: 330 ± 69 mL min; EMS: 371 ± 81 mL min, P = 0.001, effect size (Cohen's d) = 0.55]. In contrast, the VA blood flow did not change during EMS (Pre: 125 ± 47 mL min; EMS: 130 ± 45 mL min, P = 0.26, effect size = 0.12). In the EMS condition, there was a significant positive linear correlation between ΔPCO and ΔICA blood flow (R = 0.74, P = 0.02). No relationships were observed between ΔPCO and ΔVA blood flow (linear: R = - 0.17, P = 0.66; quadratic: R = 0.43, P = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results indicate that EMS increased ICA blood flow but not VA blood flow, suggesting that the effects of EMS on cerebral perfusion differ between anterior and posterior cerebral circulation, primarily due to the differences in cerebrovascular response to CO.

摘要

背景

电肌肉刺激(EMS)会引起非自愿性肌肉收缩。多项研究表明,EMS 可能成为一种替代主动运动的方法;然而,其应用于较大下肢肌肉时对脑血流(CBF)的影响知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在探讨 EMS 对 CBF 的影响,重点关注其对颈内动脉(ICA)和椎动脉(VA)的影响是否不同。

方法

采用随机交叉设计,参与者在 EMS 和对照(休息)条件下进行实验。在 EMS 或对照期间测量 ICA 和 VA 血流。监测并测量心率、血压、分钟通气量、摄氧量和呼气末二氧化碳分压(PCO)。

结果

ICA 血流在 EMS 期间增加[预:330±69 mL min;EMS:371±81 mL min,P=0.001,效应大小(Cohen's d)=0.55]。相比之下,VA 血流在 EMS 期间没有变化(预:125±47 mL min;EMS:130±45 mL min,P=0.26,效应大小=0.12)。在 EMS 条件下,ΔPCO 和 ΔICA 血流之间存在显著的正线性相关(R=0.74,P=0.02)。未观察到 ΔPCO 和 ΔVA 血流之间的关系(线性:R=-0.17,P=0.66;二次:R=0.43,P=0.55)。

结论

本研究结果表明,EMS 增加了 ICA 血流而不是 VA 血流,这表明 EMS 对脑灌注的影响在前循环和后循环之间不同,主要是由于脑血管对 CO 的反应不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6d0/8591929/6dd2869e7442/12868_2021_670_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验