Farris Samantha G, Zvolensky Michael J, DiBello Angelo M, Schmidt Norman B
Department of Psychology.
Department of Psychology, Florida State University.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Jun;27(2):467-477. doi: 10.1037/pas0000059. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
The Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS; Gifford et al., 2004) was derived as a smoking-specific measure of experiential avoidance. However, there has been little investigation of the psychometric proprieties of the AIS and no published work on the topic. The current study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the AIS among a sample of adult treatment-seeking daily smokers (n = 465; 48.2% female, 17.8 [SD = 9.60] cigarettes per day). The AIS was administered at 3 time points (baseline, quit-day, and 1 month postquit) as part of a larger smoking cessation trial. An exploratory factor analysis indicated a 2-factor solution, described by inflexibility and avoidance because of smoking related "thoughts/feelings" (9 items) and "somatic sensations" (4 items). Results revealed that the AIS-total and factor scores demonstrated high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The AIS total and factor scores also displayed high convergent, discriminant, and incremental predictive validity with theoretically relevant smoking and affective variables. The present data suggest that the AIS measure appears to be a valid and reliable smoking-specific index of experiential avoidance.
回避与僵化量表(AIS;吉福德等人,2004年)是作为一种针对吸烟的经验性回避测量工具而得出的。然而,对AIS的心理测量特性的研究很少,且该主题尚无已发表的研究成果。本研究旨在检验AIS在寻求治疗的成年每日吸烟者样本(n = 465;48.2%为女性,每天吸17.8支烟[标准差 = 9.60])中的信度和效度。作为一项更大规模戒烟试验的一部分,AIS在三个时间点(基线、戒烟日和戒烟后1个月)进行施测。探索性因素分析表明存在一个两因素解决方案,由因吸烟相关“想法/感受”(9个项目)和“躯体感觉”(4个项目)导致的僵化和回避来描述。结果显示,AIS总分和因素得分具有较高的内部一致性和重测信度。AIS总分和因素得分在与理论上相关的吸烟及情感变量方面也显示出较高的聚合效度、区分效度和增量预测效度。目前的数据表明,AIS测量似乎是一种有效且可靠的针对吸烟的经验性回避指标。