Mitchell William Kyle, Phillips Beth E, Williams John P, Rankin Debbie, Lund Jonathan N, Smith Kenneth, Atherton Philip J
Clinical, Metabolic, and Molecular Physiology, MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and Departments of Surgery and.
Clinical, Metabolic, and Molecular Physiology, MRC-Arthritis Research UK Centre of Excellence for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and.
J Nutr. 2015 Feb;145(2):207-14. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.199604. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
The anabolic response of skeletal muscle to essential amino acids (EAAs) is dose dependent, maximal at modest doses, and short lived, even with continued EAA availability, a phenomenon termed "muscle-full." However, the effect of EAA ingestion profile on muscle metabolism remains undefined.
We determined the effect of Bolus vs. Spread EAA feeding in young men and hypothesized that muscle-full is regulated by a dose-, not delivery profile-, dependent mechanism.
We provided 16 young healthy men with 15 g mixed-EAA, either as a single dose ("Bolus"; n = 8) or in 4 fractions at 45-min intervals ("Spread"; n = 8). Plasma insulin and EAA concentrations were assayed by ELISA and ion-exchange chromatography, respectively. Limb blood flow by was determined by Doppler ultrasound, muscle microvascular flow by Sonovue (Bracco) contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 substrates by immunoblotting. Intermittent muscle biopsies were taken to quantify myofibrillar-bound (13)C6-phenylalanine to determine muscle protein synthesis (MPS).
Bolus feeding achieved rapid insulinemia (13.6 μIU · mL(-1), 25 min after commencement of feeding), aminoacidemia (∼2500 μM at 45 min), and capillary recruitment (+45% at 45 min), whereas Spread feeding achieved attenuated insulin responses, gradual low-amplitude aminoacidemia (peak: ∼1500 μM at 135 min), and no detectable capillary recruitment (all P < 0.01 vs. Bolus). Despite these differences, identical anabolic responses were observed; fasting fractional synthetic rates of 0.054% · h(-1) (Bolus) and 0.066% · h(-1) (Spread) increased to 0.095% and 0.104% · h(-1) (no difference in increment or final values between regimens). With both Spread and Bolus feeding strategies, a latency of at least 90 min was observed before an upswing in MPS was evident. Similarly with both feeding strategies, MPS returned to fasting rates by 180 min despite elevated circulating EAAs.
These data do not support EAA delivery profile as an important determinant of anabolism in young men at rest, nor rapid aminoacidemia/leucinemia as being a key factor in maximizing MPS. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01735539.
骨骼肌对必需氨基酸(EAA)的合成代谢反应呈剂量依赖性,适度剂量时反应最大,且持续时间短,即便持续供应EAA也是如此,这一现象被称为“肌肉饱和”。然而,EAA摄入模式对肌肉代谢的影响尚不清楚。
我们测定了年轻男性中推注式与分散式EAA喂养的效果,并假设肌肉饱和是由剂量依赖性机制而非递送模式依赖性机制调节的。
我们为16名年轻健康男性提供15 g混合EAA,一种是单次剂量(“推注”;n = 8),另一种是每隔45分钟分4次给予(“分散”;n = 8)。分别通过酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)和离子交换色谱法测定血浆胰岛素和EAA浓度。通过多普勒超声测定肢体血流量,通过声诺维(Bracco)造影增强超声测定肌肉微血管血流量,并通过免疫印迹法测定雷帕霉素复合物1靶点底物的磷酸化情况。进行间歇性肌肉活检以定量肌原纤维结合的(13)C6 - 苯丙氨酸,以确定肌肉蛋白质合成(MPS)。
推注喂养导致快速的胰岛素血症(喂养开始后25分钟时为13.6 μIU·mL-1)、氨基酸血症(45分钟时约为2500 μM)和毛细血管募集增加(45分钟时增加45%),而分散喂养导致胰岛素反应减弱、逐渐出现低幅度氨基酸血症(峰值:135分钟时约为1500 μM)且未检测到毛细血管募集(与推注相比,所有P < 0.01)。尽管存在这些差异,但观察到相同的合成代谢反应;空腹分数合成率从0.054%·h-1(推注)和0.066%·h-1(分散)增加到0.095%和0.104%·h-1(两种方案在增加量或最终值上无差异)。采用分散和推注喂养策略时,在MPS明显上升之前均观察到至少90分钟的延迟。同样,采用两种喂养策略时,尽管循环中的EAA升高,但MPS在180分钟时恢复到空腹水平。
这些数据不支持EAA递送模式是静息状态下年轻男性合成代谢的重要决定因素,也不支持快速氨基酸血症/亮氨酸血症是使MPS最大化的关键因素。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT01735539。