Sucu Murat, Ozer Orhan, Davutoglu Vedat, Ercan Suleyman, Yuce Murat, Coskun Fatma Yilmaz
Electrophysiology Division, Cardiology Department, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 May;38(5):625-9. doi: 10.1111/pace.12599. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
We aimed to analyze ventricular repolarization in neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) patients by using T-peak-T-end interval, T-peak-T-end/QT ratio, T-peak-T-end/QTc ratio and corrected QT interval (QTc), QT dispersion (QTd), QT index (QTI) and corrected QT interval index (QTcI) comparing with the corrected JT dispersion (JTcd), and corrected JT (JTc) and the corrected JT interval index (JTcI), by inspecting ventricular activation until termination of repolarization. These parameters are used as an index of potential ventricular arrhythmogenesis.
We have studied patients with head-up tilt table test (HUTT) (+) (33 patients; mean age: 28 ± 11 years) and HUTT (-) as control group (33 patients; mean age: 30 ± 11 years). In all patients, T-peak-T-end interval, T-peak-T-end/QT ratio, T-peak-T-end/QTc ratio, QT, QTd, QTI, QTc, QTcI, JTd, JTc, and JTcI were measured on electrocardiogram.
The following parameters were statistically significant between groups: QTd (22.72 ± 17.54 msn; 11.21 ± 13.40 msn; P = 0.004), QTc (424.27 ± 33.75 msn; 403.66 ± 38.08 msn; P = 0.023), QTcI (114.09 ± 14, 29%; 106.71 ± 15.33%, P = 0.047), and QTI (100.72 ± 7.19%; 97.14 ± 7.13%, P = 0.046). Furthermore, T-peak-T-end interval was significantly prolonged in the study group (93.78 ± 20.27 msn; 81.21 ± 11.66 msn; P = 0.003). T-peak-T-end/QT ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.24 ± 0.04 msn; 0.22 ± 0.04 msn; P = 0.030). T-peak-T-end/QTc ratio was significantly higher in the study group (0.22 ± 0.04 msn; 0.20 ± 0.03 msn; P = 0.015). The JTc and JTd were also significantly higher in the study group ([103.00 ± 9, 72%; 95.44 ± 10.26%, P = 0.003], [27.57 ± 16.01 msn; 10.45 ± 16.08 msn; P < 0.001], respectively).
Electrocardiographic ventricular repolarization parameters including T-peak-T-end interval, T-peak-T-end/QT ratio, T-peak-T-end/QTc ratio, QTc, QTd, QTI, QTcI, JTc, JTd, and JTI are prolonged in NCS.
我们旨在通过使用T峰-T末间期、T峰-T末/QT比值、T峰-T末/QTc比值以及校正QT间期(QTc)、QT离散度(QTd)、QT指数(QTI)和校正QT间期指数(QTcI),并与校正JT离散度(JTcd)、校正JT(JTc)和校正JT间期指数(JTcI)进行比较,来分析神经心源性晕厥(NCS)患者的心室复极情况,通过检查心室激活直至复极终止。这些参数被用作潜在心室心律失常发生的指标。
我们研究了直立倾斜试验(HUTT)阳性的患者(33例;平均年龄:28±11岁)和作为对照组的HUTT阴性患者(33例;平均年龄:30±11岁)。在所有患者中,通过心电图测量T峰-T末间期、T峰-T末/QT比值、T峰-T末/QTc比值、QT、QTd、QTI、QTc、QTcI、JTd、JTc和JTcI。
以下参数在两组之间具有统计学意义:QTd(22.72±17.54毫秒;11.21±13.40毫秒;P = 0.004)、QTc(424.27±33.75毫秒;403.66±38.08毫秒;P = 0.023)、QTcI(114.09±14.29%;106.71±15.33%,P = 0.047)和QTI(100.72±7.19%;97.14±7.13%,P = 0.046)。此外,研究组的T峰-T末间期显著延长(93.78±20.27毫秒;81.21±11.66毫秒;P = 0.003)。研究组的T峰-T末/QT比值显著更高(0.24±0.04毫秒;0.22±0.04毫秒;P = 0.030)。研究组的T峰-T末/QTc比值显著更高(0.22±0.04毫秒;0.20±0.03毫秒;P = 0.015)。研究组的JTc和JTd也显著更高(分别为[103.00±9.72%;95.44±10.26%,P = 0.003],[27.57±16.01毫秒;10.45±16.08毫秒;P < 0.001])。
包括T峰-T末间期、T峰-T末/QT比值、T峰-T末/QTc比值、QTc、QTd、QTI、QTcI、JTc、JTd和JTI在内的心电图心室复极参数在NCS患者中延长。