Suppr超能文献

为何内分泌干扰化学物质(EDCs)对传统风险评估构成挑战,以及应如何应对。

Why endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) challenge traditional risk assessment and how to respond.

机构信息

Institute for Dryland, Environmental and Desert Research, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer 84990, Israel.

Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer 84990, Israel.

出版信息

J Hazard Mater. 2015 Apr 9;286:589-611. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.012. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

Abstract

Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) are a diverse group of "chemicals of emerging concern" which have attracted much interest from the research community since the 1990s. Today there is still no definitive risk assessment tool for EDCs. While some decision making organizations have attempted to design methodology guidelines to evaluate the potential risk from this broadly defined group of constituents, risk assessors still face many uncertainties and unknowns. Until a risk assessment paradigm is designed specifically for EDCs and is vetted by the field, traditional risk assessment tools may be used with caution to evaluate EDCs. In doing so, each issue of contention should be addressed with transparency in order to leverage available information and technology without sacrificing integrity or accuracy. The challenges that EDCs pose to traditional risk assessment are described in this article to assist in this process.

摘要

内分泌干扰化合物 (EDCs) 是一组多样化的“新兴关注化学品”,自 20 世纪 90 年代以来引起了研究界的极大兴趣。如今,仍然没有针对 EDC 的明确风险评估工具。虽然一些决策制定组织已经尝试设计方法指南来评估这个广泛定义的成分组的潜在风险,但风险评估人员仍然面临许多不确定性和未知因素。在专门为 EDC 设计风险评估范式并经过该领域验证之前,传统的风险评估工具可能需要谨慎使用,以评估 EDC。在这样做的过程中,为了在不牺牲完整性或准确性的情况下利用现有信息和技术,每个有争议的问题都应该透明地解决。本文描述了 EDC 对传统风险评估带来的挑战,以协助这一过程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验