• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在管理个人电子健康记录中的积极作用:一项定性分析。

The patients' active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis.

作者信息

Baudendistel Ines, Winkler Eva, Kamradt Martina, Brophy Sarah, Längst Gerda, Eckrich Felicitas, Heinze Oliver, Bergh Bjoern, Szecsenyi Joachim, Ose Dominik

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Voßstrasse 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2613-21. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2620-1. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-015-2620-1
PMID:25652149
Abstract

PURPOSE

The complexity of illness and cross-sectoral health care pose challenges for patients with colorectal cancer and their families. Within a patient-centered care paradigm, it is vital to give patients the opportunity to play an active role. Prospective users' attitudes regarding the patients' role in the context of a patient-controlled electronic health record (PEPA) were explored.

METHODS

A qualitative study across regional health care settings and health professions was conducted. Overall, 10 focus groups were performed collecting views of 3 user groups: patients with colorectal cancer (n = 12) and representatives from patient support groups (n = 2), physicians (n = 17), and other health care professionals (HCPs) (n = 16). Data were audio- and videotaped, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The patients' responsibility as a gatekeeper and access manager was at the center of the focus group discussions, although HCPs addressed aspects that would limit patients taking an active role (e.g., illness related issues). Despite expressed concerns, PEPAs possibility to enhance personal responsibility was seen in all user groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Giving patients an active role in managing a personal electronic health record is an innovative patient-centered approach, although existing restraints have to be recognized. To enhance user adoption and advance PEPAs potential, key user needs have to be addressed.

摘要

目的

疾病的复杂性和跨部门医疗保健给结直肠癌患者及其家庭带来了挑战。在以患者为中心的护理模式中,让患者有机会发挥积极作用至关重要。本研究探讨了潜在用户对患者在患者控制的电子健康记录(PEPA)背景下所扮演角色的态度。

方法

在区域医疗保健机构和卫生专业领域开展了一项定性研究。总共进行了10个焦点小组讨论,收集了3个用户群体的意见:结直肠癌患者(n = 12)、患者支持小组代表(n = 2)、医生(n = 17)以及其他医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)(n = 16)。数据进行了音频和视频录制,逐字转录,并采用定性内容分析法进行主题分析。

结果

患者作为把关人和访问管理者的责任是焦点小组讨论的核心,尽管医疗保健专业人员提到了一些会限制患者发挥积极作用的方面(如与疾病相关的问题)。尽管存在担忧,但所有用户群体都认为PEPA有增强个人责任感的可能性。

结论

让患者在管理个人电子健康记录中发挥积极作用是一种创新的以患者为中心的方法,不过必须认识到现有的限制因素。为了提高用户接受度并挖掘PEPA的潜力,必须满足关键用户的需求。

相似文献

1
The patients' active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis.患者在管理个人电子健康记录中的积极作用:一项定性分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2613-21. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2620-1. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
2
Cross-sectoral cancer care: views from patients and health care professionals regarding a personal electronic health record.跨部门癌症护理:患者和医疗保健专业人员对个人电子健康记录的看法。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Mar;26(2). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12429. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
Personal electronic health records: understanding user requirements and needs in chronic cancer care.个人电子健康记录:了解慢性癌症护理中的用户要求和需求。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 21;17(5):e121. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3884.
4
Developing a Shared Patient-Centered, Web-Based Medication Platform for Type 2 Diabetes Patients and Their Health Care Providers: Qualitative Study on User Requirements.为2型糖尿病患者及其医疗服务提供者开发一个以患者为中心的基于网络的共享用药平台:用户需求的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 27;20(3):e105. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8666.
5
Collaboration and communication in colorectal cancer care: a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by patients and health care professionals.结直肠癌护理中的协作与沟通:对患者和医护人员所经历挑战的定性研究
Fam Pract. 2015 Dec;32(6):686-93. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv069. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
6
Utilizing a Prototype Patient-Controlled Electronic Health Record in Germany: Qualitative Analysis of User-Reported Perceptions and Perspectives.在德国使用患者自控电子健康记录原型:对用户报告的认知和观点进行定性分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2018 Aug 3;2(2):e10411. doi: 10.2196/10411.
7
Client perceptions of the mental health engagement network: a qualitative analysis of an electronic personal health record.客户对心理健康参与网络的看法:对电子个人健康记录的定性分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 14;15:250. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0614-7.
8
Patient empowerment through a user-centered design of an electronic personal health record: a qualitative study of user requirements in chronic kidney disease.通过以用户为中心的电子个人健康记录设计实现患者赋权:慢性肾脏病患者需求的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 24;21(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01689-2.
9
Making it work for me: beliefs about making a personal health record relevant and useable.使其对我有用:关于使个人健康记录具有相关性和可用性的信念。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3254-z.
10
Enhancing Privacy Controls for Patients via a Selective Authentic Electronic Health Record Exchange Service: Qualitative Study of Perspectives by Medical Professionals and Patients.通过选择性可信电子健康记录交换服务增强患者隐私控制:医学专业人员和患者观点的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 21;20(12):e10954. doi: 10.2196/10954.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing patients' needs in the follow-up after treatment for colorectal cancer-a mixed-method study.评估结直肠癌治疗后随访中患者的需求:一项混合方法研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Feb 26;32(3):192. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08401-w.
2
Mobile Access to Medical Records in Heart Transplantation Aftercare: Mixed-Methods Study Assessing Usability, Feasibility and Effects of a Mobile Application.心脏移植术后护理中医疗记录的移动访问:评估移动应用程序可用性、可行性和效果的混合方法研究
Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;12(8):1204. doi: 10.3390/life12081204.
3
Using an Integrated Framework to Investigate the Facilitators and Barriers of Health Information Technology Implementation in Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review.电子患者门户:关于健康结果、满意度、效率和态度的证据:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Nov 19;159(10):677-87. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-10-201311190-00006.
2
Can't see the forest for the care plan: a call to revisit the context of care planning.只见护理计划,不见整体情况:呼吁重新审视护理计划的背景。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 20;31(21):2651-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.4618. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
3
Evaluating the quality of colorectal cancer care across the interface of healthcare sectors.
利用综合框架研究非传染性疾病管理中健康信息技术实施的促进因素和障碍:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 20;24(7):e37338. doi: 10.2196/37338.
4
The patient as a prosumer of healthcare: insights from a bibliometric-interpretive review.患者作为医疗保健的产消者:基于文献计量学和解释性综述的见解。
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Apr 5;36(9):133-157. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2021-0401.
5
Effects of a Personal Health Record in Maternity Care: A Stepped-Wedge Trial.个人健康记录在产时保健中的效果:一项阶梯式试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 30;18(19):10343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910343.
6
Beyond Known Barriers-Assessing Physician Perspectives and Attitudes Toward Introducing Open Health Records in Germany: Qualitative Study.突破已知障碍——评估德国医生对引入开放健康记录的观点和态度:定性研究
J Particip Med. 2020 Nov 6;12(4):e19093. doi: 10.2196/19093.
7
Caregivers' role in using a personal electronic health record: a qualitative study of cancer patients and caregivers in Germany.照顾者在使用个人电子健康记录方面的作用:德国癌症患者和照顾者的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01172-4.
8
An Electronic Medication Module to Improve Health Literacy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.一个用于提高2型糖尿病患者健康素养的电子药物模块:试点随机对照试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Apr 28;4(4):e13746. doi: 10.2196/13746.
9
Digitalizing Health Services by Implementing a Personal Electronic Health Record in Germany: Qualitative Analysis of Fundamental Prerequisites From the Perspective of Selected Experts.德国通过实施个人电子健康记录实现医疗服务数字化:从部分专家视角对基本前提条件的定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 29;22(1):e15102. doi: 10.2196/15102.
10
Patients' perception of communication at the interface between primary and secondary care: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries.患者对初级保健和二级保健之间沟通的感知:34 个国家的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):1018. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4848-9.
评估医疗保健领域之间结直肠癌护理的质量。
PLoS One. 2013 May 1;8(5):e60947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060947. Print 2013.
4
A systematic review of web-based interventions for patient empowerment and physical activity in chronic diseases: relevance for cancer survivors.基于网络的慢性病患者赋权与身体活动干预措施的系统评价:对癌症幸存者的相关性
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 20;15(2):e37. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2281.
5
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead.邀请患者阅读医生的记录:一项准实验研究及前瞻性观察。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):461-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002.
6
Personal health records and hypertension control: a randomized trial.个人健康记录与高血压控制:一项随机试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):626-34. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000349. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
7
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: patients and doctors look ahead: patient and physician surveys.邀请患者阅读医生的记录:患者和医生展望未来:患者和医生调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):811-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00003.
8
Patient interest in sharing personal health record information: a web-based survey.患者对分享个人健康记录信息的兴趣:一项基于网络的调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20;155(12):805-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00002.
9
Patient empowerment by electronic health records: first results of a systematic review on the benefit of patient portals.电子健康记录赋能患者:关于患者门户网站益处的系统评价的初步结果
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;165:63-7.
10
The value of personal health records for chronic disease management: what do we know?个人健康记录在慢性病管理中的价值:我们了解什么?
Fam Med. 2011 May;43(5):351-4.