• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌护理中的协作与沟通:对患者和医护人员所经历挑战的定性研究

Collaboration and communication in colorectal cancer care: a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by patients and health care professionals.

作者信息

Kamradt Martina, Baudendistel Ines, Längst Gerda, Kiel Marion, Eckrich Felicitas, Winkler Eva, Szecsenyi Joachim, Ose Dominik

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg and

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg and.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2015 Dec;32(6):686-93. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv069. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmv069
PMID:26311705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4652682/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is becoming a chronic condition. This has significant implications for the delivery of health care and implies the involvement of a range of health care professionals (HCPs) from different settings to ensure the needed quality and continuity of care.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the challenges that patients and HCPs experience in the course of colorectal cancer care and the perceived consequences caused by these challenges.

METHODS

Ten semi-structured focus groups were conducted including patients receiving treatment for colorectal cancer, representatives of patient support groups, physicians and other non-physician HCPs from different health care settings. Participants were asked to share their experiences regarding colorectal cancer care. All data were audio- and videotaped, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Patients and HCPs (total N = 47) experienced collaboration and communication as well as exchange of information between HCPs as challenging. Particularly communication and information exchange with GPs appeared to be lacking. The difficulties identified restricted a well-working coordination of care and seemed to cause inappropriate health care.

CONCLUSION

Colorectal cancer care seems to require an effective, well-working collaboration and communication between the different HCPs involved ensuring the best possible care to suit patients' individual needs. However, the perceived challenges and consequences of our participants seem to restrict the delivery of the needed quality of care. Therefore, it seems crucial (i) to include all HCPs involved, especially the GP, (ii) to support an efficient and standardized exchange of health-related information and (iii) to focus on the patients' entire pathway of care.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌正逐渐成为一种慢性病。这对医疗保健的提供具有重大影响,意味着需要不同医疗环境中的一系列医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)参与,以确保所需的护理质量和连续性。

目的

探讨患者和医疗保健专业人员在结直肠癌护理过程中所经历的挑战以及这些挑战所带来的感知后果。

方法

开展了10个半结构化焦点小组讨论,参与者包括接受结直肠癌治疗的患者、患者支持小组代表、医生以及来自不同医疗保健环境的其他非医生医疗保健专业人员。参与者被要求分享他们在结直肠癌护理方面的经历。所有数据进行了音频和视频录制,逐字转录,并使用定性内容分析法进行主题分析。

结果

患者和医疗保健专业人员(共47人)认为医疗保健专业人员之间的协作、沟通以及信息交流具有挑战性。特别是与全科医生的沟通和信息交流似乎存在不足。所发现的这些困难限制了护理工作的良好协调,似乎还导致了不适当的医疗保健。

结论

结直肠癌护理似乎需要不同医疗保健专业人员之间进行有效、良好的协作与沟通,以确保提供最适合患者个体需求的最佳护理。然而,我们参与者所感知到的挑战和后果似乎限制了所需护理质量的提供。因此,似乎至关重要的是:(i)纳入所有相关的医疗保健专业人员,尤其是全科医生;(ii)支持高效、标准化的健康相关信息交流;(iii)关注患者的整个护理路径。

相似文献

1
Collaboration and communication in colorectal cancer care: a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by patients and health care professionals.结直肠癌护理中的协作与沟通:对患者和医护人员所经历挑战的定性研究
Fam Pract. 2015 Dec;32(6):686-93. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv069. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
2
Cross-sectoral cancer care: views from patients and health care professionals regarding a personal electronic health record.跨部门癌症护理:患者和医疗保健专业人员对个人电子健康记录的看法。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Mar;26(2). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12429. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
Malnutrition: A Misunderstood Diagnosis by Primary Care Health Care Professionals and Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Ireland.营养不良:爱尔兰初级保健医疗保健专业人员和社区居住的老年人的误解诊断。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Dec;121(12):2443-2453. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
4
Patients' experiences with continuity of cancer care in Canada: Results from the CanIMPACT study.加拿大癌症护理连续性患者体验:CanIMPACT研究结果
Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):821-827.
5
Developing a Shared Patient-Centered, Web-Based Medication Platform for Type 2 Diabetes Patients and Their Health Care Providers: Qualitative Study on User Requirements.为2型糖尿病患者及其医疗服务提供者开发一个以患者为中心的基于网络的共享用药平台:用户需求的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 27;20(3):e105. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8666.
6
The patients' active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis.患者在管理个人电子健康记录中的积极作用:一项定性分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2613-21. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2620-1. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
7
The complexities of communication at hospital discharge of older patients: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views.老年患者出院时沟通的复杂性:医护人员观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):1211. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10192-5.
8
Perceptions of shared care among survivors of colorectal cancer from non-English-speaking and English-speaking backgrounds: a qualitative study.非英语背景和英语背景的结直肠癌幸存者对共享护理的认知:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 30;19(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0822-6.
9
Personal electronic health records: understanding user requirements and needs in chronic cancer care.个人电子健康记录:了解慢性癌症护理中的用户要求和需求。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 21;17(5):e121. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3884.
10
Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on the Secondary Use of Health Records to Improve Quality and Safety of Care in England: Qualitative Study.医疗保健专业人员对英格兰健康记录二次利用以改善医疗质量和安全的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 26;21(9):e14135. doi: 10.2196/14135.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the lack of continuity of care in older cancer patients under China's 'integrated health system' reform.探讨中国“整合卫生系统”改革下老年癌症患者护理连续性的缺失。
Age Ageing. 2024 Oct 1;53(10). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae213.
2
Patients' experiences of living with a stoma in rural areas in Northern Sweden.瑞典北部农村地区造口患者的生活体验。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2023 Dec;82(1):2221767. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2023.2221767.
3
The needs of colorectal cancer patients/survivors: A narrative review.结直肠癌患者/幸存者的需求:一项叙述性综述。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jul 29;11:227. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1093_21. eCollection 2022.
4
The Intersectoral Care of Cancer Patients: Weaknesses and Strategies for Improvement.癌症患者的跨部门护理:弱点与改进策略。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Nov 19;118(46):795-796. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0316.
5
Caregivers' role in using a personal electronic health record: a qualitative study of cancer patients and caregivers in Germany.照顾者在使用个人电子健康记录方面的作用:德国癌症患者和照顾者的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01172-4.
6
Challenges to cross-sectoral care experienced by professionals working with patients living with low back pain: a qualitative interview study.跨部门护理面临的挑战:与腰痛患者合作的专业人员的定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4988-y.
7
Feasibility and acceptability of follow-up for prostate cancer in primary care: a pilot study.基层医疗中前列腺癌随访的可行性与可接受性:一项试点研究。
BJGP Open. 2018 Dec 12;2(4):bjgpopen18X101616. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101616. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
Utilizing a Prototype Patient-Controlled Electronic Health Record in Germany: Qualitative Analysis of User-Reported Perceptions and Perspectives.在德国使用患者自控电子健康记录原型:对用户报告的认知和观点进行定性分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2018 Aug 3;2(2):e10411. doi: 10.2196/10411.
9
Views of psycho-oncologists, physicians, and nurses on cancer care-A qualitative study.心理肿瘤学家、医生和护士对癌症护理的看法——一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 16;14(1):e0210325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210325. eCollection 2019.
10
Correspondence between primary and secondary care about patients with cancer: A qualitative mixed-methods analysis.癌症患者初级保健与二级保健之间的沟通:一项定性混合方法分析。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12903. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12903. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Skill mix, roles and remuneration in the primary care workforce: who are the healthcare professionals in the primary care teams across the world?基层医疗队伍中的技能组合、角色和薪酬:全球基层医疗团队中的医疗专业人员有哪些?
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Mar;52(3):727-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
2
Perspectives of quality care in cancer treatment: a review of the literature.癌症治疗中的优质护理视角:文献综述
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013 Jul;6(6):321-9.
3
German general practitioners' views on their involvement and role in cancer care: a qualitative study.德国全科医生对其在癌症护理中的参与情况及角色的看法:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2014 Apr;31(2):209-14. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt088. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
4
Evaluating the quality of colorectal cancer care across the interface of healthcare sectors.评估医疗保健领域之间结直肠癌护理的质量。
PLoS One. 2013 May 1;8(5):e60947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060947. Print 2013.
5
Poor communication in cancer care: patient perspectives on what it is and what to do about it.癌症护理中的沟通不良:患者对其的看法及应对措施。
Cancer Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;36(6):445-53. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31827eeda4.
6
Ensuring quality cancer care: a follow-up review of the Institute of Medicine's 10 recommendations for improving the quality of cancer care in America.确保癌症治疗质量:对美国医学研究所改善癌症治疗质量的 10 项建议进行后续审查。
Cancer. 2012 May 15;118(10):2571-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26536. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
7
Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground.基层医疗医生与专科医生之间的转诊及会诊沟通:寻求共识。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):56-65. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.480.
8
Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness.自我管理:使癌症慢性病患者能够并能够自主生活。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):50-62. doi: 10.3322/caac.20093. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
9
The quality of cancer patient experience: perspectives of patients, family members, providers and experts.癌症患者体验的质量:患者、家属、医护人员及专家的观点
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):484-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.042374.
10
What is important in cancer care coordination? A qualitative investigation.癌症护理协调的重点是什么?一项定性调查。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 Mar;20(2):220-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01187.x.