Suppr超能文献

癌症患者临终关怀场所的丧亲家庭决策遗憾与相关因素之间的关系。

Relationships between bereaved families' decision-making regret about end-of-life care place for patients with cancer and relevant factors.

作者信息

Okimura Aiko, Hayashi Naoko

机构信息

Department of Oncology Nursing and Palliative Care, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Nov 17;10(1):100167. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100167. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Decision-making regarding end-of-life care (EOLC) place causes psychological burden on families and 70% of bereaved families have regrets. Healthcare professionals need to support families to prevent regrets. This study aims to clarify the relationship between the factors related to the decision-making methods used to choose a place of care for terminal cancer patients and the regret experienced by bereaved families.

METHODS

Participants were 1110 bereaved family members of patients with cancer. The questionnaire items were as follows: the agreement between patients and their families regarding their preferred place of EOLC, decision-making methods, satisfaction with the factors involved in the decision-making processes, experience regarding communication with medical personnel, and regret experienced by the bereaved families.

RESULTS

This analysis included 332 valid responses from 343 respondents. The regret score was significantly lower for the group wherein patients and their caregivers/families had similar preferences regarding the EOLC place ( ​< ​0.001). Regret scores were significantly higher in the physician-led decision-making group (vs. positive role group  ​= ​0.004, vs. shared role group  ​= ​0.014). The regret scores for the bereaved family members were negatively correlated with the satisfaction scores for "friend support," "relationship with doctor," "information," "explanation by doctor," "thought as oneself," and "participation in the decision" (ρ ​= ​-0.207-0.400,  ​≤ ​0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce bereaved families' regret, family members should know the patients' preferred place of EOLC, and patients and their families should be supported by physicians and nurses to understand their options and participate in the decision-making process.

摘要

目的

临终关怀(EOLC)地点的决策给家庭带来心理负担,70%的丧亲家庭有遗憾。医疗保健专业人员需要支持家庭以避免遗憾。本研究旨在阐明与晚期癌症患者护理地点选择的决策方法相关的因素与丧亲家庭所经历的遗憾之间的关系。

方法

参与者为1110名癌症患者的丧亲家庭成员。调查问卷项目如下:患者与其家人在首选的EOLC地点方面的一致性、决策方法、对决策过程中涉及因素的满意度、与医务人员沟通的经历以及丧亲家庭所经历的遗憾。

结果

本分析纳入了343名受访者中的332份有效回复。对于患者及其护理人员/家人在EOLC地点方面有相似偏好的组,遗憾得分显著更低(<0.001)。在医生主导的决策组中,遗憾得分显著更高(与积极作用组相比,=0.004;与共同作用组相比,=0.014)。丧亲家庭成员的遗憾得分与“朋友支持”“与医生的关系”“信息”“医生的解释”“自我思考”和“参与决策”的满意度得分呈负相关(ρ=-0.207 - 0.400,≤0.001)。

结论

为了减少丧亲家庭的遗憾,家庭成员应该了解患者首选的EOLC地点,并且医生和护士应该支持患者及其家人了解他们的选择并参与决策过程。

相似文献

1
Relationships between bereaved families' decision-making regret about end-of-life care place for patients with cancer and relevant factors.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Nov 17;10(1):100167. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100167. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Talking About Death With Terminally-Ill Cancer Patients: What Contributes to the Regret of Bereaved Family Members?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):853-860.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
3
[The impact of support from medical professionals on families' decision-making during end-of-life care].
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2020;57(2):163-172. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.57.163.
5
Decision Making Regarding the Place of End-of-Life Cancer Care: The Burden on Bereaved Families and Related Factors.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):862-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.348. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
Bereaved families' experiences of end-of-life decision making for general medicine patients.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 15. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002743.
10
"It's Hard Not to Have Regrets:" Qualitative Analysis of Decisional Regret in Bereaved Parents.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):e399-e407. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.12.144. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Family involvement in advance care planning for people living with advanced cancer: A systematic mixed-methods review.
Palliat Med. 2022 Mar;36(3):462-477. doi: 10.1177/02692163211068282. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Preferred and actual place of death in haematological malignancies: a report from the UK haematological malignancy research network.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Mar;11(1):7-16. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002097. Epub 2020 May 11.
3
Place of death for patients with cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2015: Racial, age, and geographic disparities.
Cancer. 2018 Nov 15;124(22):4408-4419. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31737. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
4
End-of-life care: Where do cancer patients want to die? A systematic review.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;13(6):356-364. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12678. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
6
Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):114-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551638. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Conflict accompanying the choice of initial treatment in breast cancer patients.
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2012 Dec;9(2):177-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00200.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
8
Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 1;362(13):1211-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0907901.
9
NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: palliative care.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Apr;7(4):436-73. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0031.
10
Good death inventory: a measure for evaluating good death from the bereaved family member's perspective.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 May;35(5):486-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.07.009. Epub 2008 Mar 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验