Jahanbin Arezoo, Shahabi Mostafa, Ahrari Farzaneh, Bozorgnia Yasaman, Shajiei Arezoo, Shafaee Hooman, Afshari Jalil Tavakkol
Dental Research Center, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Bojnord University of Medical Sciences, Bojnord, Iran.
J Orthod Sci. 2015 Jan-Mar;4(1):13-8. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.149610.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of fiber reinforced composite bonded retainers in comparison with flexible spiral wires (FSWs) under high and low cariogenic-simulated environments using human oral fibroblasts.
Four types of bonded retainers were evaluated: (1) reinforced with glass fibers: Interlig (Angelus), (2) reinforced with polyethylene fibers: Connect (Kerr), (3) reinforced with quartz fibers: Quartz Splint UD (RTD), and (4) FSW. Twenty specimens of each sample group were prepared with the same surface area and halved. Next, half of them were placed in a high cariogenic environment 60 min in 10% lactic acid 3 times a day and remained in Fusayama Meyer artificial saliva for the rest of the day) and the other half were placed in a low cariogenic environment 20 min in 10% lactic acid 3 times a day and remained in Fusayama Meyer artificial saliva for the rest of the day) for 1, 7 and 30 days. Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (α =0.05).
During the 1(st) month, cytotoxicity reduced gradually. In the low cariogenic-simulated environment, the cytotoxicity of all of the groups were reported to be mild at day 30 and the difference between them was significant (P = 0.016). In the same period in the high cariogenic-simulated environment, the cytotoxicity of Connect and Quartz Splint was mild, and they had lower cytotoxicity than the other groups. Meanwhile, Interlig had moderate (52%) and FSW had severe cytotoxicity (22%) and the difference between the groups was also significant (P = 0.000).
FSW retainers are not recommended in those at high-risk for dental caries. However, in those at low-risk, there is no difference from the standpoint of cytotoxicity.
本研究旨在使用人口腔成纤维细胞,在高致龋模拟环境和低致龋模拟环境下,评估纤维增强复合粘结固位体与柔性螺旋丝(FSW)相比的细胞毒性作用。
评估了四种类型的粘结固位体:(1)玻璃纤维增强型:Interlig(安杰卢斯),(2)聚乙烯纤维增强型:Connect(克尔),(3)石英纤维增强型:Quartz Splint UD(RTD),以及(4)FSW。每个样本组制备20个表面积相同的标本,并将其对半切开。接下来,其中一半置于高致龋环境中(每天3次,每次在10%乳酸中放置60分钟,其余时间置于舟山市迈耶人工唾液中),另一半置于低致龋环境中(每天3次,每次在10%乳酸中放置20分钟,其余时间置于舟山市迈耶人工唾液中),持续1、7和30天。通过MTT法评估细胞活力。使用SPSS软件分析数据(α = 0.05)。
在第1个月期间,细胞毒性逐渐降低。在低致龋模拟环境中,所有组在第30天的细胞毒性均报告为轻度,且它们之间的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.016)。在高致龋模拟环境中的同一时期,Connect和Quartz Splint的细胞毒性为轻度,且它们的细胞毒性低于其他组。同时,Interlig具有中度细胞毒性(52%),FSW具有重度细胞毒性(22%),且各组之间的差异也具有统计学意义(P = 0.000)。
对于龋齿高危人群,不推荐使用FSW固位体。然而,对于低风险人群,从细胞毒性的角度来看没有差异。