Wylde Vikki, Lenguerrand Erik, Gooberman-Hill Rachael, Beswick Andrew D, Marques Elsa, Noble Sian, Horwood Jeremy, Pyke Mark, Dieppe Paul, Blom Ashley W
Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom North Bristol NHS Trust, Brunel Building, Bristol, United Kingdom Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Pain. 2015 Jun;156(6):1161-1170. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000114.
Total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) are usually effective at relieving pain; however, 7% to 23% of patients experience chronic postsurgical pain. These trials aimed to investigate the effect of local anaesthetic wound infiltration on pain severity at 12 months after primary THR or TKR for osteoarthritis. Between November 2009 and February 2012, 322 patients listed for THR and 316 listed for TKR were recruited into a single-centre double-blind randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive local anaesthetic infiltration and standard care or standard care alone. Participants and outcomes assessors were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was pain severity on the WOMAC Pain Scale at 12 months after surgery. Analyses were conducted using intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches. In the hip trial, patients in the intervention group had significantly less pain at 12 months postoperative than patients in the standard care group (differences in means: 4.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-8.54; P = 0.015), although the difference was not clinically significant. Post hoc analysis found that patients in the intervention group were more likely to have none to moderate pain than severe pain at 12 months than those in the standard care group (odds ratio: 10.19; 95% CI: 2.10-49.55; P = 0.004). In the knee trial, there was no strong evidence that the intervention influenced pain severity at 12 months postoperative (difference in means: 3.83; 95% CI: -0.83 to 8.49; P = 0.107). In conclusion, routine use of infiltration could be beneficial in improving long-term pain relief for some patients after THR.
全髋关节置换术(THR)和全膝关节置换术(TKR)通常能有效缓解疼痛;然而,7%至23%的患者会经历慢性术后疼痛。这些试验旨在研究局部麻醉剂伤口浸润对骨关节炎初次THR或TKR术后12个月时疼痛严重程度的影响。在2009年11月至2012年2月期间,322例计划接受THR的患者和316例计划接受TKR的患者被纳入一项单中心双盲随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受局部麻醉剂浸润加标准护理或仅接受标准护理。参与者和结果评估者对分组情况不知情。主要结局是术后12个月时WOMAC疼痛量表上的疼痛严重程度。采用意向性分析和符合方案分析方法进行分析。在髋关节试验中,干预组患者术后12个月时的疼痛明显少于标准护理组患者(均值差异:4.74;95%置信区间[CI]:0.95 - 8.54;P = 0.015),尽管该差异无临床显著性。事后分析发现,干预组患者在术后12个月时无至中度疼痛的可能性高于标准护理组患者出现重度疼痛的可能性(优势比:10.19;95%CI:2.10 - 49.55;P = 0.004)。在膝关节试验中,没有有力证据表明该干预措施会影响术后12个月时的疼痛严重程度(均值差异:3.83;95%CI: - 0.83至8.49;P = 0.107)。总之,对于一些接受THR后的患者,常规使用浸润可能有助于改善长期疼痛缓解情况。