• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部与全身注射甲氨蝶呤治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效和安全性比较。

Comparative efficacy and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in cesarean scar pregnancy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Department of Ultrasonography, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Jan 27;11:137-42. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S76050. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S76050
PMID:25670903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4315462/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) injection in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

METHOD

A randomized controlled study was performed in 104 CSP patients receiving either local or systemic MTX injection at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from the year 2008 to 2013.

RESULTS

Complete cure was defined as regression of ultrasonographic findings and normalization of serum β-hCG within 60 days. It was regarded as delayed cure if additional dilation and curettage (D&C) was needed. The overall cure rate (complete cure plus delayed cure) was 69.2% versus 67.3% for local injection versus systemic administration (P>0.05). The median time for serum β-hCG remission and uterine mass disappearance after systemic administration (42 [21-69] days and 40 [20-67] days) were significantly lower than those receiving local injection (56 [24-92] days and 53 [23-88] days), with P=0.029 and 0.046, respectively. The mean pretreatment serum β-hCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) level and lesion size in cured group (21,941±18,351 mIU/mL and 2.9±1.3 cm, respectively) were significantly lower than those in the failed group (37,047±30,864 mIU/mL and 3.6±1.3) with P=0.038 and 0.044, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MTX injection is effective in CSP treatment. Systemic administration shows similar overall cure rate compared to local injection, but requires shorter time for serum β-hCG remission and uterine mass disappearance.

摘要

目的

探讨甲氨蝶呤(MTX)注射治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的疗效。

方法

采用随机对照研究,选取 2008 年至 2013 年在北京协和医院接受局部或全身 MTX 注射治疗的 104 例 CSP 患者。

结果

完全治愈定义为超声检查结果消退和血清β-hCG 在 60 天内正常化。如果需要额外的扩张和刮宫(D&C),则认为是延迟治愈。局部注射与全身给药的总治愈率(完全治愈加延迟治愈)分别为 69.2%和 67.3%(P>0.05)。全身给药后血清β-hCG 缓解和子宫肿块消失的中位数时间(42[21-69]天和 40[20-67]天)明显低于局部注射(56[24-92]天和 53[23-88]天),P 值分别为 0.029 和 0.046。治愈组(21941±18351 mIU/mL 和 2.9±1.3 cm)的预处理血清β-hCG(人绒毛膜促性腺激素)水平和病变大小明显低于未治愈组(37047±30864 mIU/mL 和 3.6±1.3),P 值分别为 0.038 和 0.044。

结论

MTX 注射治疗 CSP 有效。全身给药与局部给药的总治愈率相似,但血清β-hCG 缓解和子宫肿块消失的时间更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/4315462/fe42af11b650/tcrm-11-137Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/4315462/fe42af11b650/tcrm-11-137Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9a/4315462/fe42af11b650/tcrm-11-137Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of local and systemic methotrexate injection in cesarean scar pregnancy.局部与全身注射甲氨蝶呤治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效和安全性比较。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Jan 27;11:137-42. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S76050. eCollection 2015.
2
[Analysis of 96 cases with cesarean scar pregnancy].剖宫产瘢痕妊娠96例分析
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Sep;45(9):664-8.
3
Local intra-gestational sac methotrexate injection followed by dilation and curettage in treating cesarean scar pregnancy.局部宫内孕囊内注射甲氨蝶呤后行扩张刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;302(2):439-445. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05619-x. Epub 2020 May 30.
4
Safety and Efficacy of a Single Local Methotrexate Injection for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.单次局部注射甲氨蝶呤治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的安全性和有效性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Mar;29(3):416-423. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
5
Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis.子宫动脉栓塞术与甲氨蝶呤治疗中国人群剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的Meta分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Nov-Dec;23(7):1040-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.819. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
6
Uterine artery embolization combined with curettage vs. methotrexate plus curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy.子宫动脉栓塞联合刮宫术与甲氨蝶呤加刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的对比
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jul;294(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3952-2. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
[Clinical study on 39 cases with caesarean scar pregnancy with sonographic mass].[39例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠伴超声肿块的临床研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;49(1):10-3.
8
Ultrasound-guided local injection of methotrexate and systemic intramuscular methotrexate in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.超声引导下甲氨蝶呤局部注射联合全身肌内注射甲氨蝶呤治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jan;61(1):147-153. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.147. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
Transvaginal methotrexate injection for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: efficacy and subsequent fecundity.经阴道甲氨蝶呤注射治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:疗效及后续生育力
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
10
A retrospective comparative study evaluating the efficacy of adding intra-arterial methotrexate infusion to uterine artery embolisation followed by curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy.一项回顾性比较研究,评估在子宫动脉栓塞后刮宫术基础上加用动脉内甲氨蝶呤灌注治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的疗效。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 May;297(5):1205-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4686-8. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Three case reports and literature review.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:三例病例报告及文献综述
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025 May 29;26:100407. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100407. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Treatment of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy with Hysteroscopic Resection.宫腔镜切除术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 Mar 15;14(2):170-173. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_28_24. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
A prediction nomogram for residual after negative pressure aspiration for endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Successful medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies with systemic multidose methotrexate: single-center experience.全身多剂量甲氨蝶呤成功治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠:单中心经验
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jun;40(6):1700-6. doi: 10.1111/jog.12414.
2
The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊断、治疗及随访。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):44.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
3
Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review.
内源性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠负压吸宫术后残留的预测列线图:一项回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2.
4
Outcome Reporting in Studies Investigating Treatment for Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠治疗研究的结果报告:一项系统评价
BJOG. 2025 Feb;132(3):278-287. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17989. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
5
Advances in Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Fertility Preservation.剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的治疗进展:技术、临床结局和生育力保存的综合评价。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Apr 3;30:e943550. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943550.
6
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Current Understanding and Treatment Including Role of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:当前的认识与治疗,包括微创外科技术的作用
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Apr 19;12(2):64-71. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_116_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
7
Treatment of ectopic pregnancy implanted on cesarea scar: cohort study 2018-2022, Lima, Peru.剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠的治疗:2018-2022 年秘鲁利马的队列研究。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2023 Jun 30;74(2):15-30. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3958.
8
Scarred for life: a review of cesarean section scar pregnancy and potential pitfalls in diagnosis.疤痕累累的一生:剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的回顾及诊断中的潜在陷阱。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Aug;48(8):2672-2683. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-03953-7. Epub 2023 May 19.
9
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Successful Ultrasound-Guided Removal after Uterine Artery Ligation.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠及子宫动脉结扎术后超声引导下成功清除
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr 21;2023:6026206. doi: 10.1155/2023/6026206. eCollection 2023.
10
Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure.宫腔内注射甲氨蝶呤用取卵套装治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠和宫颈妊娠的保守性保生育力手术。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 14;59(4):761. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040761.
剖宫产率升高带来的意外后果:早期胎盘植入和剖宫产瘢痕妊娠。综述。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):14-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
4
Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:子宫动脉化疗栓塞与全身甲氨蝶呤注射治疗的疗效和安全性比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Mar;161(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.11.026. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
5
Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:处理方案的综述。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;23(6):415-21. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834cef0c.
6
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus systemic methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy.经导管动脉化疗栓塞与全身甲氨蝶呤治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Jun;113(3):178-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.027. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
7
Uterine artery embolization combined with local methotrexate and systemic methotrexate for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with different ultrasonographic pattern.子宫动脉栓塞联合局部甲氨蝶呤和全身甲氨蝶呤治疗不同超声表现的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Apr;35(2):286-91. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0097-y. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
8
Methotrexate therapy for cesarean section scar pregnancy with and without suction curettage.
Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1208-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1780. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
9
Caesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
BJOG. 2007 Mar;114(3):253-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01237.x.
10
Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management.剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠:病因、诊断与处理
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1373-81. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce.