Kristensen Solvejg, Sabroe Svend, Bartels Paul, Mainz Jan, Christensen Karl Bang
The Danish Clinical Registries, Aarhus, Denmark ; Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark ; Aalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark.
Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 2;7:149-60. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S75560. eCollection 2015.
Measuring and developing a safe culture in health care is a focus point in creating highly reliable organizations being successful in avoiding patient safety incidents where these could normally be expected. Questionnaires can be used to capture a snapshot of an employee's perceptions of patient safety culture. A commonly used instrument to measure safety climate is the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). The purpose of this study was to adapt the SAQ for use in Danish hospitals, assess its construct validity and reliability, and present benchmark data.
The SAQ was translated and adapted for the Danish setting (SAQ-DK). The SAQ-DK was distributed to 1,263 staff members from 31 in- and outpatient units (clinical areas) across five somatic and one psychiatric hospitals through meeting administration, hand delivery, and mailing. Construct validity and reliability were tested in a cross-sectional study. Goodness-of-fit indices from confirmatory factor analysis were reported along with inter-item correlations, Cronbach's alpha (α), and item and subscale scores.
Participation was 73.2% (N=925) of invited health care workers. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed: c(2)=1496.76, P<0.001, CFI 0.901, RMSEA (90% CI) 0.053 (0.050-0056), Probability RMSEA (p close)=0.057. Inter-scale correlations between the factors showed moderate-to-high correlations. The scale stress recognition had significant negative correlations with each of the other scales. Questionnaire reliability was high, (α=0.89), and scale reliability ranged from α=0.70 to α=0.86 for the six scales. Proportions of participants with a positive attitude to each of the six SAQ scales did not differ between the somatic and psychiatric health care staff. Substantial variability at the unit level in all six scale mean scores was found within the somatic and the psychiatric samples.
SAQ-DK showed good construct validity and internal consistency reliability. SAQ-DK is potentially a useful tool for evaluating perceptions of patient safety culture in Danish hospitals.
衡量并培育医疗保健领域的安全文化是创建高度可靠组织的重点,这类组织能够成功避免通常可能发生的患者安全事件。问卷调查可用于获取员工对患者安全文化认知的概况。一种常用的衡量安全氛围的工具是安全态度问卷(SAQ)。本研究的目的是对SAQ进行改编以用于丹麦医院,评估其结构效度和信度,并提供基准数据。
对SAQ进行翻译并改编以适用于丹麦的情况(SAQ-DK)。通过会议管理、亲自递送和邮寄的方式,将SAQ-DK分发给来自五家综合医院和一家精神病医院的31个门诊和住院科室(临床区域)的1263名工作人员。在一项横断面研究中测试结构效度和信度。报告了验证性因素分析的拟合优度指标以及项目间相关性、克朗巴哈系数(α)以及项目和子量表得分。
受邀医护人员的参与率为73.2%(N = 925)。验证性因素分析的拟合优度指标显示:χ² = 1496.76,P < 0.001,CFI = 0.901,RMSEA(90% CI)= 0.053(0.050 - 0.056),Probability RMSEA(p close)= 0.057。各因素之间的量表间相关性显示为中度至高相关性。量表压力认知与其他每个量表均呈显著负相关。问卷信度较高(α = 0.89),六个量表的量表信度范围为α = 0.70至α = 0.86。在SAQ的六个量表中,综合医院和精神病医院医护人员对每个量表持积极态度的参与者比例没有差异。在综合医院和精神病医院样本中,所有六个量表平均得分在科室层面均存在显著差异。
SAQ-DK显示出良好的结构效度和内部一致性信度。SAQ-DK可能是评估丹麦医院患者安全文化认知的有用工具。