Wu Xiangmei May, Fan Zhihua Tina, Zhu Xianlei, Jung Kyung Hwa, Ohman-Strickland Pamela, Weisel Clifford P, Lioy Paul J
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ), USA ; UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, USA.
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ), USA ; UMDNJ - School of Public Health, USA.
Atmos Environ (1994). 2012 Sep;57:72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.04.029.
To address disparities in health risks associated with ambient air pollution for racial/ethnic minority groups, this study characterized personal and ambient concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a suspected hot spot of air pollution - the Village of Waterfront South (WFS), and an urban reference community - the Copewood/Davis Streets (CDS) neighborhood in Camden, New Jersey. Both are minority-dominant, impoverished communities. We collected 24-h integrated personal air samples from 54 WFS residents and 53 CDS residents, with one sample on a weekday and one on a weekend day during the summer and winter seasons of 2004-2006. Ambient air samples from the center of each community were also collected simultaneously during personal air sampling. Toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (TEX) presented higher ( < 0.05) ambient levels in WFS than in CDS, particularly during weekdays. A stronger association between personal and ambient concentrations of MTBE and TEX was found in WFS than in CDS. Fourteen to forty-two percent of the variation in personal MTBE, hexane, benzene, and TEX was explained by local outdoor air pollution. These observations indicated that local sources impacted the community air pollution and personal exposure in WFS. The estimated cancer risks resulting from two locally emitted VOCs, benzene and ethylbenzene, and non-cancer neurological and respiratory effects resulting from hexane, benzene, toluene, and xylenes exceeded the US EPA risk benchmarks in both communities. These findings emphasized the need to address disparity in health risks associated with ambient air pollution for the socio-economically disadvantaged groups. This study also demonstrated that air pollution hot spots similar to WFS can provide robust setting to investigate health effects of ambient air pollution.
为了解决种族/族裔少数群体在与环境空气污染相关的健康风险方面存在的差异,本研究对新泽西州卡姆登一个疑似空气污染热点地区——滨水南区(WFS)以及一个城市对照社区——科普伍德/戴维斯街(CDS)社区的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的个人暴露浓度和环境浓度进行了特征分析。这两个社区都是以少数族裔为主的贫困社区。我们从54名WFS居民和53名CDS居民中采集了24小时综合个人空气样本,在2004 - 2006年的夏季和冬季,工作日采集一个样本,周末采集一个样本。在采集个人空气样本的同时,还从每个社区的中心同步采集了环境空气样本。甲苯、乙苯和二甲苯(TEX)在WFS的环境水平高于CDS(<0.05),尤其是在工作日。与CDS相比,在WFS中发现甲基叔丁基醚(MTBE)和TEX的个人暴露浓度与环境浓度之间的关联更强。个人MTBE、己烷、苯和TEX浓度变化的14%至42%可由当地室外空气污染来解释。这些观察结果表明,当地污染源影响了WFS社区的空气污染和个人暴露。两种本地排放的VOCs,苯和乙苯所导致的估计癌症风险,以及己烷、苯、甲苯和二甲苯所导致的非癌症神经和呼吸影响,在两个社区都超过了美国环境保护局(US EPA)的风险基准。这些发现强调了有必要解决社会经济弱势群体在与环境空气污染相关的健康风险方面存在的差异。本研究还表明,类似于WFS的空气污染热点地区可为调查环境空气污染的健康影响提供有力的研究环境。