社区环境、补充营养援助计划（SNAP-Ed）资格与健康行为：对加利福尼亚健康访谈调查（CHIS）的分析。
Neighborhood Environments, SNAP-Ed Eligibility, and Health Behaviors: An Analysis of the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS).
机构信息
RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA, 90407, USA.
Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
出版信息
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):543-551. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00433-x.
Abstract
Neighborhood conditions are associated with health outcomes, but whether individual health behaviors are independent of or associated with the settings are not clear. We analyzed the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) (N = 11,152) data to determine if the perceptions and behaviors of similar individuals with an income low enough to be eligible for SNAP-Ed services differed based on whether they lived in high- or low-income neighborhoods. We found that SNAP-Ed eligible individuals living in low-income neighborhoods walked for transportation more frequently (3.04 times versus 2.38 times, p = 0.001), drank sugary beverages more frequently in the past month (2.93 times versus 1.69 times, p = 0.000), and had a higher risk of obesity than similar low-income individuals living in high-income neighborhoods (0.34 versus 0.26, p = 0.012).
摘要
社区环境与健康结果相关，但个人健康行为是否独立于环境或与环境相关尚不清楚。我们分析了加利福尼亚健康访谈调查（CHIS）（N=11152）的数据，以确定是否有足够收入获得 SNAP-Ed 服务的类似个人的感知和行为因居住在高收入或低收入社区而有所不同。我们发现，居住在低收入社区的 SNAP-Ed 合格个人更频繁地步行出行（3.04 次与 2.38 次，p=0.001），过去一个月更频繁地饮用含糖饮料（2.93 次与 1.69 次，p=0.000），并且肥胖风险高于居住在高收入社区的类似低收入个人（0.34 与 0.26，p=0.012）。
相似文献
1
Neighborhood Environments, SNAP-Ed Eligibility, and Health Behaviors: An Analysis of the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS).社区环境、补充营养援助计划（SNAP-Ed）资格与健康行为：对加利福尼亚健康访谈调查（CHIS）的分析。
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):543-551. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00433-x.
2
SNAP at the Community Scale: How Neighborhood Characteristics Affect Participation and Food Access.社区层面的 SNAP：邻里特征如何影响参与度和食物获取。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1646-1651. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305363. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Differences in the Neighborhood Retail Food Environment and Obesity Among US Children and Adolescents by SNAP Participation.参与 SNAP 计划的美国儿童和青少年的邻里零售食品环境和肥胖差异。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Jun;26(6):1063-1071. doi: 10.1002/oby.22184.
4
Trends and Disparities in Diet Quality Among US Adults by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Status.美国成年人的膳食质量趋势和差异，按补充营养援助计划参与状况划分。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun;1(2):e180237. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0237.
5
Impact of gentrification on adult mental health.中产阶级化对成年人心理健康的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun;55(3):432-444. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13264. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
6
The effects of childhood SNAP use and neighborhood conditions on adult body mass index.儿童时期使用补充营养援助项目（SNAP）和邻里条件对成人身体质量指数的影响。
Demography. 2012 Aug;49(3):1127-54. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0115-y.
7
Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Dietary Behaviors: Role of Community Food Environment.参与补充营养援助计划与饮食行为：社区食物环境的作用。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jun;119(6):934-943.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.11.021. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
8
Fruit and Vegetable, Fat, and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Among Low-Income Mothers Living in Neighborhoods With Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education.参与补充营养援助计划教育项目的低收入母亲的水果、蔬菜、脂肪及含糖饮料摄入量情况，这些母亲居住在相关社区中。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016 Nov-Dec;48(10):683-690.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Food deserts in Leon County, FL: disparate distribution of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-accepting stores by neighborhood characteristics.佛罗里达州利昂县的食品荒漠：接受补充营养援助计划的商店在社区特征方面分布不均。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Nov-Dec;44(6):539-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.06.007. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
10
Poor Dietary Guidelines Compliance among Low-Income Women Eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed).低收入符合补充营养援助计划教育（SNAP-Ed）条件的妇女饮食指南遵守情况较差。
Nutrients. 2018 Mar 8;10(3):327. doi: 10.3390/nu10030327.
引用本文的文献
1
Time in the United States and walking for physical activity among Black Californians: Findings from the California Health Interview Survey (2012-2017).美国的时间与加利福尼亚州黑人的体育活动步行情况：来自加利福尼亚健康访谈调查（2012 - 2017年）的结果
J Migr Health. 2025 Feb 12;11:100315. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100315. eCollection 2025.
2
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education reductions during COVID-19 may have exacerbated health inequities.新冠疫情期间补充营养援助计划教育方面的削减可能加剧了健康不平等现象。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jul 23;23:101471. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101471. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
California's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) social marketing campaign: mothers' fruit and vegetable consumption and facilitation of children's healthy behaviours.加利福尼亚州补充营养援助计划教育项目（SNAP-Ed）社会营销活动：母亲对水果和蔬菜的消费以及促进儿童健康行为。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Nov;26(11):2514-2525. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001301. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
4
Health Behavior Changes Among Adults in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education, Los Angeles County, California.加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县补充营养援助计划教育项目中成年人健康行为的改变。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Dec 16;18:E102. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.210221.
5
Simulating the impact of health behavior interventions in the SNAP-Ed population.模拟健康行为干预对补充营养援助计划教育项目人群的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Dec 9;20:101257. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101257. eCollection 2020 Dec.
本文引用的文献
1
Barriers to healthy food access: Associations with household income and cooking behavior.获取健康食品的障碍：与家庭收入及烹饪行为的关联
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jan 31;13:298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.01.023. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Association of community food environment and obesity among US adults: a geographical information system analysis.美国成年人社区食物环境与肥胖的关联：地理信息系统分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Feb;73(2):148-155. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210838. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
3
Obesity and place: Chronic disease in the 500 largest U.S. cities.肥胖与地域：美国 500 大城市的慢性病。
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;12(5):421-425. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
4
Health and Social Conditions of the Poorest Versus Wealthiest Counties in the United States.美国最贫困县与最富裕县的健康与社会状况
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan;107(1):130-135. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303515. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
Research on neighborhood effects on health in the United States: A systematic review of study characteristics.美国邻里环境对健康影响的研究：研究特征的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;168:16-29. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.047. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
6
Body Mass Index: Obesity, BMI, and Health: A Critical Review.体重指数：肥胖、BMI与健康：一项批判性综述。
Nutr Today. 2015 May;50(3):117-128. doi: 10.1097/NT.0000000000000092. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
7
The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014.2001 - 2014年美国收入与预期寿命之间的关联
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1750-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4226.
8
Assaults, murders and walkers: The impact of violent crime on physical activity.袭击、谋杀与行人：暴力犯罪对身体活动的影响。
J Health Econ. 2016 May;47:34-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
9
Why the Neighborhood Social Environment Is Critical in Obesity Prevention.为何邻里社会环境对预防肥胖至关重要。
J Urban Health. 2016 Feb;93(1):206-12. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-0017-6.
10
Tract- and county-level income inequality and individual risk of obesity in the United States.美国县级和州级收入不平等与个体肥胖风险
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Jan;55:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
Zotero 插件