• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Employee engagement within the NHS: a cross-sectional study.员工在国民保健制度中的敬业度:一项横断面研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Jan 4;4(2):85-90. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.12. eCollection 2015 Feb.
2
Work engagement among participants of residency and professional development programs in nursing.护理住院医师培训和专业发展项目参与者的工作投入度
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(suppl 4):1487-1492. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0278.
3
Do we all agree on how to measure work engagement? Factorial validity of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale as a standard measurement tool - A literature review.我们是否都认同如何衡量工作投入度?作为一种标准测量工具的乌得勒支工作投入量表的因素效度——一项文献综述。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 Mar 30;30(2):161-175. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00947. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
4
The impact of a large-scale quality improvement programme on work engagement: preliminary results from a national cross-sectional-survey of the 'Productive Ward'.一项大规模质量改进计划对工作投入的影响:来自“高效病房”全国横断面调查的初步结果。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Dec;51(12):1634-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 14.
5
Engagement in primary health care nurses: A cross-sectional study in a Brazilian city.参与初级卫生保健护士:巴西一城市的横断面研究。
Public Health Nurs. 2020 Mar;37(2):169-177. doi: 10.1111/phn.12694. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
6
One, two or three dimensions of work engagement? Testing the factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale on a sample of Polish employees.工作投入的一维、二维还是三维?在波兰员工样本中检验乌得勒支工作投入量表的因子效度。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019 Jun;25(2):241-249. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1371958. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
7
Assessment of work engagement among dentists in Hyderabad.海得拉巴市牙医工作投入度评估。
Work. 2017;58(3):333-340. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172630.
8
Work Engagement in Serbia: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES).塞尔维亚的工作投入:乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)塞尔维亚语版的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 16;8:1799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01799. eCollection 2017.
9
Relationship between resilience at work, work engagement and job satisfaction among engineers: a cross-sectional study.工作韧性、工作投入与工程师工作满意度的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):1077. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18507-9.
10
Dimensions of social support in the experience of work engagement in middle age: A Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study.中年工作投入体验中的社会支持维度:芬兰北部出生队列 1966 年研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2020 Oct;61(5):679-689. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12640. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the impact of employee engagement and patient safety.探讨员工敬业度和患者安全的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Aug 30;34(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac059.
2
Plastic Surgeons as Medical Directors: A Natural Transition into Medical Leadership.整形外科医生担任医疗主任:向医疗领导角色的自然转变。
Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Apr 6;49(2):221-226. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744421. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Exploring the effect of perceived organizational support and resilience on Chinese pharmacists' engagement in stressful and competitive pharmaceutical work at hospitals.探讨感知到的组织支持和心理韧性对中国医院药师在压力大且竞争激烈的药学工作中敬业度的影响。
Saudi Pharm J. 2021 Sep;29(9):931-938. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
The Association Between Health Care Staff Engagement and Patient Safety Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.医疗保健人员敬业度与患者安全结果之间的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Apr 1;17(3):207-216. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000807.
5
Moving beyond hand hygiene monitoring as a marker of infection prevention performance: Development of a tailored infection control continuous quality improvement tool.超越手部卫生监测作为感染预防性能的指标:开发定制的感染控制持续质量改进工具。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Jan;48(1):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
6
Simulation for Operational Readiness in a New Freestanding Emergency Department: Strategy and Tactics.新建独立急诊部运营准备模拟:策略与战术。
Simul Healthc. 2016 Oct;11(5):345-356. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000180.
7
Mindfulness, Resilience, and Burnout Subtypes in Primary Care Physicians: The Possible Mediating Role of Positive and Negative Affect.初级保健医生的正念、心理韧性和职业倦怠亚型:积极和消极情绪的潜在中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 17;6:1895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01895. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Work engagement as a key driver of quality of care: a study with midwives.工作投入是护理质量的关键驱动因素:一项针对助产士的研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(3):330-49. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2012-0192.
2
The Work Experience Measurement Scale (WEMS): a useful tool in workplace health promotion.工作经验测量量表(WEMS):工作场所健康促进的有用工具。
Work. 2013;45(3):379-87. doi: 10.3233/WOR-121541.
3
How employee engagement matters for hospital performance.员工敬业度对医院绩效的重要性。
Healthc Q. 2012;15(2):29-39. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2012.22915.
4
Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee well-being and performance in opposite directions?工作狂和工作投入是否会朝着相反的方向预测员工的幸福感和绩效?
Ind Health. 2012;50(4):316-21. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.ms1355. Epub 2012 May 30.
5
Turn everyday tasks into employee engagement opportunities.将日常工作转化为员工参与机会。
Radiol Manage. 2011 Nov-Dec;33(6):16.
6
Employee engagement: a prescription for organizational transformation.员工敬业度:组织变革的一剂良方。
Adv Health Care Manag. 2011;10:77-96. doi: 10.1108/s1474-8231(2011)0000010011.
7
A psychometric evaluation of the Scale of Work Engagement and Burnout (SWEBO).工作投入与倦怠量表(SWEBO)的心理测量学评估。
Work. 2010;37(3):261-74. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1078.
8
The mediating effect of burnout on the relationship between structural empowerment and organizational citizenship behaviours.工作倦怠在结构授权与组织公民行为关系中的中介效应。
J Nurs Manag. 2010 Apr;18(3):339-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01074.x.
9
The relationship between reciprocity and burnout in Dutch medical residents.荷兰住院医师的互惠与职业倦怠之间的关系。
Med Educ. 2008 Jul;42(7):721-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03041.x.
10
Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis.业务部门层面员工满意度、员工敬业度与业务成果之间的关系:一项元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Apr;87(2):268-79. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268.

员工在国民保健制度中的敬业度:一项横断面研究。

Employee engagement within the NHS: a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Jan 4;4(2):85-90. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.12. eCollection 2015 Feb.

DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.12
PMID:25674571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4322631/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Employee engagement is the emotional commitment of the employee towards the organisation. We aimed to analyse baseline work engagement using Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) at a teaching hospital.

METHODS

We have conducted a cross-sectional study within the National Health Service (NHS) Teaching Hospital in the UK. All participants were working age population from both genders directly employed by the hospital. UWES has three constituting dimensions of work engagement as vigor, dedication, and absorption. We conducted the study using UWES-9 tool. Outcome measures were mean score for each dimension of work engagement (vigor, dedication, absorption) and total score compared with control score from test manual.

RESULTS

We found that the score for vigor and dedication is significantly lower than comparison group (P< 0.0001 for both). The score for absorption was significantly higher than comparison group (P< 0.0001). However, total score is not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that work engagement level is below average within the NHS employees. Vigor and dedication are significantly lower, these are characterised by energy, mental resilience, the willingness to invest one's effort, and persistence as well as a sense of significance, enthusiasm, inspiration, pride, and challenge. The NHS employees are immersed in work. Urgent need to explore strategies to improve work engagement as it is vital for improving productivity, safety and patient experience.

摘要

背景

员工敬业度是员工对组织的情感投入。我们旨在使用乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES)分析教学医院的工作投入基线。

方法

我们在英国国民保健服务(NHS)教学医院内进行了一项横断面研究。所有参与者均为直接受雇于医院的工作年龄的两性人群。UWES 由工作投入的三个构成维度组成,即活力、奉献和专注。我们使用 UWES-9 工具进行了这项研究。结果测量是每个工作投入维度(活力、奉献、专注)的平均得分,以及与测试手册中对照组的总分比较。

结果

我们发现,活力和奉献的得分明显低于对照组(两者均 P<0.0001)。专注的得分明显高于对照组(P<0.0001)。然而,总分没有显著差异。

结论

该研究表明,国民保健服务员工的工作投入水平低于平均水平。活力和奉献明显较低,其特点是精力充沛、心理韧性、投入努力的意愿以及坚持,以及意义感、热情、灵感、自豪感和挑战感。国民保健服务员工全身心投入工作。迫切需要探索提高工作投入的策略,因为这对于提高生产力、安全性和患者体验至关重要。