Tryba M
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University of Bochum Bergmannsheil, Federal Republic of Germany.
Am J Med. 1989 Jun 9;86(6A):85-93. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90165-4.
Conventional stress bleeding prophylaxis with antacids or histamine (H2)-antagonists, as well as the newer mucosa-protective drugs pirenzepine and sucralfate, are satisfying most of the clinicians with regard to efficacy of stress bleeding prevention. Therefore, potential side effects are attaining crucial importance with regard to the drugs to be used. Pharmacologic blockade of cardiac H2-receptors increases the risk of bradycardia and negative inotropic effects as well as coronary vasoconstriction at least in the presence of elevated plasma histamine levels. Intracardiac injection of pirenzepine can lead to temporary tachycardia. Elderly patients have been shown to be at an increased risk of side effects to the central nervous system when treated with H2-antagonists. These drugs can also induce toxic effects in the liver. Cimetidine leads to interactions with a number of drugs used in the intensive care unit. In patients with pre-existing pulmonary diseases, H2-antagonists have been demonstrated to increase pulmonary bronchoconstriction. Alkalinization of the gastric juice is associated with a significant increase in colonization of gram-negative bacteria in the stomach. In intubated patients, aspiration of stomach contents occurs in 30 to 40 percent of the patients. A number of studies have shown a direct correlation between alkalinization of the gastric juice and pulmonary infections. Sucralfate and to a lesser degree pirenzepine can reduce the risk of pulmonary infections. Sucralfate also exerts a bactericidal effect. Recent investigations support the hypothesis that alkalinization of the stomach also increases the risk of systemic infections. This may be the main reason for the observation that at least in ventilated patients sucralfate, unlike H2-antagonists or antacids, leads to a significant reduction of the mortality rate compared with conventional stress bleeding prophylaxis.
使用抗酸剂或组胺(H2)拮抗剂进行传统的应激性出血预防,以及较新的黏膜保护药物哌仑西平和硫糖铝,在预防应激性出血的疗效方面使大多数临床医生感到满意。因此,就所使用的药物而言,潜在的副作用正变得至关重要。心脏H2受体的药理阻断至少在血浆组胺水平升高的情况下会增加心动过缓和负性肌力作用以及冠状动脉收缩的风险。心内注射哌仑西平可导致暂时性心动过速。已证明老年患者在用H2拮抗剂治疗时发生中枢神经系统副作用的风险增加。这些药物还可在肝脏中诱导毒性作用。西咪替丁会与重症监护病房中使用的多种药物发生相互作用。在患有既往肺部疾病的患者中,已证明H2拮抗剂会增加肺支气管收缩。胃液碱化与胃中革兰氏阴性菌定植的显著增加有关。在插管患者中,30%至40%的患者会发生胃内容物误吸。多项研究表明胃液碱化与肺部感染之间存在直接关联。硫糖铝以及程度较轻的哌仑西平可降低肺部感染的风险。硫糖铝还具有杀菌作用。最近的研究支持这样一种假说,即胃碱化也会增加全身感染的风险。这可能是观察到以下现象的主要原因:至少在机械通气患者中,与传统的应激性出血预防措施不同,硫糖铝与H2拮抗剂或抗酸剂相比,可显著降低死亡率。