Geruschat Duane R, Flax Marshall, Tanna Nilima, Bianchi Michelle, Fisher Andy, Goldschmidt Mira, Fisher Lynne, Dagnelie Gislin, Deremeik Jim, Smith Audrey, Anaflous Fatima, Dorn Jessy
Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Wisconsin Council of the Blind and Visually Impaired, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Clin Exp Optom. 2015 Jul;98(4):342-7. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12242. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
Research groups and funding agencies need a functional assessment suitable for an ultra-low vision population to evaluate the impact of new vision-restoration treatments. The purpose of this study was to develop a pilot assessment to capture the functional visual ability and well-being of subjects whose vision has been partially restored with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System.
The Functional Low-Vision Observer Rated Assessment (FLORA) pilot assessment involved a self-report section, a list of functional visual tasks for observation of performance and a case narrative summary. Results were analysed to determine whether the interview questions and functional visual tasks were appropriate for this ultra-low vision population and whether the ratings suffered from floor or ceiling effects. Thirty subjects with severe to profound retinitis pigmentosa (bare light perception or worse in both eyes) were enrolled in a clinical trial and implanted with the Argus II System. From this population, 26 subjects were assessed with the FLORA. Seven different evaluators administered the assessment.
All 14 interview questions were asked. All 35 tasks for functional vision were selected for evaluation at least once, with an average of 20 subjects being evaluated for each test item. All four rating options—impossible (33 per cent), difficult (23 per cent), moderate (24 per cent) and easy (19 per cent)—were used by the evaluators. Evaluators also judged the amount of vision they observed the subjects using to complete the various tasks, with 'vision only' occurring 75 per cent on average with the System ON, and 29 per cent with the System OFF.
The first version of the FLORA was found to contain useful elements for evaluation and to avoid floor and ceiling effects. The next phase of development will be to refine the assessment and to establish reliability and validity to increase its value as an assessment tool for functional vision and well-being.
研究团队和资助机构需要一种适用于超低视力人群的功能评估方法,以评估新型视力恢复治疗的效果。本研究的目的是开发一种初步评估方法,以了解使用阿格斯II型视网膜假体系统部分恢复视力的受试者的功能性视觉能力和健康状况。
功能性低视力观察者评分评估(FLORA)初步评估包括一个自我报告部分、一份用于观察表现的功能性视觉任务清单和一份病例叙述总结。对结果进行分析,以确定访谈问题和功能性视觉任务是否适用于这一超低视力人群,以及评分是否存在地板效应或天花板效应。30名患有严重至极重度视网膜色素变性(双眼仅有光感或更差)的受试者参加了一项临床试验,并植入了阿格斯II型系统。从这一人群中,26名受试者接受了FLORA评估。由7名不同的评估人员进行评估。
所有14个访谈问题均被问到。所有35项功能性视觉任务均至少被选择评估一次,每个测试项目平均有20名受试者接受评估。评估人员使用了所有四种评分选项——不可能(33%)、困难(23%)、中等(24%)和容易(19%)。评估人员还判断了他们观察到受试者在完成各种任务时所使用的视力程度,系统开启时,平均75%的情况为“仅靠视力”,系统关闭时为29%。
发现FLORA的第一版包含了用于评估的有用元素,并且避免了地板效应和天花板效应。下一阶段的开发将是完善评估方法,并建立可靠性和有效性,以提高其作为功能性视觉和健康状况评估工具的价值。