Suppr超能文献

使用α方法和超快超声评估肌肉和肌腱僵硬度

Muscle and tendon stiffness assessment using the alpha method and ultrafast ultrasound.

作者信息

Hauraix Hugo, Fouré Alexandre, Dorel Sylvain, Cornu Christophe, Nordez Antoine

机构信息

Laboratory "Movement, Interactions, Performance" (EA 4334), University of Nantes, UFR STAPS, 25 bis boulevard Guy Mollet, BP 72206, 44322, Nantes Cedex 3, France.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Jul;115(7):1393-400. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3112-1. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The alpha method enables the dissociation of the passive (i.e., tendinous tissues) and active (i.e., fascicles) part of muscle-tendon stiffness. It is based on two main assumptions (i.e., a constant tendon stiffness and a muscle stiffness proportional to the torque produced), which have not been approved in vivo. The purpose of this study was to validate these two assumptions using ultrafast ultrasound, and to compare fascicle and tendon stiffness as determined by both methods.

METHODS

Ten healthy males performed a fast-stretch experiment on the ankle plantar flexors. The mathematical model of the alpha method allowed to estimate the stiffness of muscle and tendinous tissues on the basis of the assumptions associated to the behaviors of muscle fascicles and tendinous tissues. Muscle and tendon stiffness of the gastrocnemius medialis were also calculated from ultrafast ultrasound measurements.

RESULTS

Muscle stiffness measured by the ultrasound method increased from 217 ± 83 to 720 ± 265 N/mm with an increasing level of force (from 30 to 90 % MVC). Tendinous stiffness measured by the ultrasound method remained constant across the force level (P < 0.001). However, the stiffness values obtained with both methods were significantly different (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, these findings validate the two main assumptions underlying the alpha method using ultrasound. Differences in stiffness values obtained with alpha and ultrasound methods could be associated with physiological and geometrical differences between the whole plantar flexors muscles characterized by the alpha method and the gastrocnemius medialis assessed with the ultrasound method.

摘要

目的

α 方法能够区分肌腱刚度的被动部分(即肌腱组织)和主动部分(即肌束)。该方法基于两个主要假设(即恒定的肌腱刚度和与产生的扭矩成正比的肌肉刚度),但尚未在体内得到验证。本研究的目的是使用超快超声验证这两个假设,并比较两种方法测定的肌束和肌腱刚度。

方法

10 名健康男性对踝跖屈肌进行快速拉伸实验。α 方法的数学模型允许根据与肌肉肌束和肌腱组织行为相关的假设来估计肌肉和肌腱组织的刚度。还通过超快超声测量计算了腓肠肌内侧头的肌肉和肌腱刚度。

结果

超声法测得的肌肉刚度随力量水平增加(从 30%到 90%最大自主收缩)从 217±83 增加到 720±265 N/mm。超声法测得的肌腱刚度在整个力量水平上保持恒定(P<0.001)。然而,两种方法获得的刚度值有显著差异(P<0.001)。

结论

总之,这些发现使用超声验证了 α 方法的两个主要假设。α 方法和超声方法获得的刚度值差异可能与 α 方法所表征的整个跖屈肌与超声评估的腓肠肌内侧头之间的生理和几何差异有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验