Frost Ryan, Skidmore Jeffrey, Santello Marco, Artemiadis Panagiotis
Human-Oriented Robotics and Control Lab, School for Engineering of Matter Transport and Energy, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.
Neural Control of Movement Laboratory, School of Biological and Healthy Systems Engineering, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 9;9:14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00014. eCollection 2015.
Sensorimotor control theories propose that the central nervous system exploits expected sensory consequences generated by motor commands for movement planning, as well as online sensory feedback for comparison with expected sensory feedback for monitoring and correcting, if needed, ongoing motor output. In our study, we tested this theoretical framework by quantifying the functional role of expected vs. actual proprioceptive feedback for planning and regulation of gait in humans. We addressed this question by using a novel methodological approach to deliver fast perturbations of the walking surface stiffness, in conjunction with a virtual reality system that provided visual feedback of upcoming changes of surface stiffness. In the "predictable" experimental condition, we asked subjects to learn associating visual feedback of changes in floor stiffness (sand patch) during locomotion to quantify kinematic and kinetic changes in gait prior to and during the gait cycle. In the "unpredictable" experimental condition, we perturbed floor stiffness at unpredictable instances during the gait to characterize the gait-phase dependent strategies in recovering the locomotor cycle. For the "unpredictable" conditions, visual feedback of changes in floor stiffness was absent or inconsistent with tactile and proprioceptive feedback. The investigation of these perturbation-induced effects on contralateral leg kinematics revealed that visual feedback of upcoming changes in floor stiffness allows for both early (preparatory) and late (post-perturbation) changes in leg kinematics. However, when proprioceptive feedback is not available, the early responses in leg kinematics do not occur while the late responses are preserved although in a, slightly attenuated form. The methods proposed in this study and the preliminary results of the kinematic response of the contralateral leg open new directions for the investigation of the relative role of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive feedback on gait control, with potential implications for designing novel robot-assisted gait rehabilitation approaches.
感觉运动控制理论提出,中枢神经系统利用运动指令产生的预期感觉后果进行运动规划,并利用在线感觉反馈与预期感觉反馈进行比较,以便在需要时监测和纠正正在进行的运动输出。在我们的研究中,我们通过量化预期与实际本体感觉反馈在人类步态规划和调节中的功能作用,对这一理论框架进行了测试。我们通过一种新颖的方法来解决这个问题,即结合虚拟现实系统,对行走表面刚度进行快速扰动,该系统提供即将到来的表面刚度变化的视觉反馈。在“可预测”实验条件下,我们要求受试者学习将运动过程中地板刚度变化(沙地)的视觉反馈联系起来,以量化步态周期之前和期间步态的运动学和动力学变化。在“不可预测”实验条件下,我们在步态期间不可预测的时刻扰动地板刚度,以表征恢复运动周期中与步态阶段相关的策略。对于“不可预测”条件,地板刚度变化的视觉反馈不存在或与触觉和本体感觉反馈不一致。对这些扰动对侧腿运动学影响的研究表明,即将到来的地板刚度变化的视觉反馈允许腿部运动学的早期(准备性)和晚期(扰动后)变化。然而,当本体感觉反馈不可用时,腿部运动学的早期反应不会发生,而晚期反应虽然略有减弱但仍会保留。本研究中提出的方法以及对侧腿运动学反应的初步结果为研究视觉、触觉和本体感觉反馈在步态控制中的相对作用开辟了新方向,对设计新型机器人辅助步态康复方法具有潜在意义。