Köbach Anke, Schaal Susanne, Elbert Thomas
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz Konstanz, Germany ; Vivo International ( www.vivo.org ).
Vivo International ( www.vivo.org ) ; Department of Psychology, University of Ulm Ulm, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 7;5:1518. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01518. eCollection 2014.
Former members of armed groups in eastern DR Congo had typically witnessed, experienced, and perpetrated extreme forms of violence. Enhanced trauma-related symptoms had been shown in prior research. But also lashing out in self-defense is a familiar response to threat defined as reactive aggression. Another potential response is appetitive aggression, in which the perpetration of excessive violence is perceived as pleasurable (combat high). What roles do these forms of aggressive behavior play in modern warfare and how are they related to posttraumatic stress symptoms? To answer the question, we sought to determine predictors for appetitive aggressive and trauma-related mental illness, and investigated the frequency of psychopathological symptoms for high- and low-intensity conflict demobilization settings. To this end, we interviewed 213 former members of (para)military groups in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo in regard to their combat exposure, posttraumatic stress, appetitive aggression, depression, suicidality, and drug dependence. Random forest regression embedded in a conditional inference framework revealed that perpetrated violent acts are not necessarily stressful. In fact, the experience of violent acts that typically implicated salient cues of hunting (e.g., blood, suffering of the victim, etc.) had the strongest association with an appetite for aggression. Furthermore, the number of lifetime perpetrated violent acts was the most important predictor of appetitive aggression. However, the number of perpetrated violent acts did not significantly affect the posttraumatic stress. Greater intensity of conflict was associated with more severe posttraumatic stress symptoms and depression. Psychotherapeutic interventions that address appetitive aggression in addition to trauma-related mental illness, including drug dependence, therefore seem indispensible for a successful reintegration of those who fought in the current civil wars.
刚果民主共和国东部武装组织的前成员通常目睹、经历并实施过极端形式的暴力。先前的研究表明,他们存在与创伤相关的症状加剧的情况。但出于自卫进行攻击也是对威胁的一种常见反应,即反应性攻击。另一种潜在反应是欲望性攻击,即实施过度暴力被视为一种愉悦感(战斗快感)。这些攻击行为在现代战争中扮演着什么角色,它们与创伤后应激症状又有怎样的关联?为了回答这个问题,我们试图确定欲望性攻击和创伤相关精神疾病的预测因素,并调查了高强度和低强度冲突复员情况下心理病理症状的出现频率。为此,我们采访了刚果民主共和国东部213名(准)军事组织的前成员,了解他们的战斗经历、创伤后应激、欲望性攻击、抑郁、自杀倾向和药物依赖情况。嵌入条件推理框架的随机森林回归显示,实施暴力行为不一定会造成压力。事实上,那些涉及典型狩猎显著线索(如鲜血、受害者的痛苦等)的暴力行为经历与攻击欲望的关联最为强烈。此外,一生当中实施暴力行为的次数是欲望性攻击最重要的预测因素。然而,实施暴力行为的次数对创伤后应激并没有显著影响。冲突强度越大,创伤后应激症状和抑郁就越严重。因此,对于那些参加过当前内战的人来说,除了针对与创伤相关的精神疾病(包括药物依赖)进行心理治疗干预外,还应对欲望性攻击进行干预,这对于他们成功重新融入社会似乎是必不可少的。