DiMeglio Linda A, Cheng Peiyao, Beck Roy W, Kollman Craig, Ruedy Katrina J, Slover Robert, Aye Tandy, Weinzimer Stuart A, Bremer Andrew A, Buckingham Bruce
Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Endocrinology/Diabetology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2016 Jun;17(4):237-43. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12271. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
Prior studies examining beta-cell preservation in type 1 diabetes have predominantly assessed stimulated C-peptide concentrations approximately 10 wk after diagnosis. We examined whether earlier assessments might aid in prediction of beta cell function over time.
Using data from a multi-center randomized trial assessing the effect of intensive diabetes management initiated within 1 wk of diagnosis, we assessed which clinical factors predicted 90-min mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) stimulated C-peptide values obtained 2 and 6 wk after diagnosis. We also studied associations of these factors with C-peptide values at 1- and 2-year post-diagnosis. Data from intervention and control groups were pooled.
Among 67 study participants (mean age 13.3 ± 5.7 yr, range 7.8-45.7 yr) in multivariable analyses, C-peptide increased from baseline to 2 wks and then 6 wk. C-peptide levels at these times were significantly correlated with 1- and 2-yr C-peptide concentrations (all p < 0.001), with the strongest observed associations between 6-wk C-peptide and the 1- and 2-yr values (r = 0.66 and r = 0.61, respectively). In multivariable analyses, greater baseline and 6-wk C-peptide, and older age independently predicted greater 1- and 2-yr C-peptide concentrations.
C-peptide assessments close to diagnosis were predictive of subsequent C-peptide production. Our data demonstrate a clear increase in C-peptide over the initial 6 wk after diabetes diagnosis followed by a plateau. Our data do not suggest that MMTT assessments performed closer to diagnosis than 6 wk would improve prediction of subsequent residual beta cell function.
既往关于1型糖尿病β细胞保存的研究主要评估诊断后约10周时刺激后的C肽浓度。我们研究了更早的评估是否有助于预测β细胞功能随时间的变化。
利用一项多中心随机试验的数据,该试验评估了诊断后1周内开始强化糖尿病管理的效果,我们评估了哪些临床因素可预测诊断后2周和6周时90分钟混合餐耐量试验(MMTT)刺激后的C肽值。我们还研究了这些因素与诊断后1年和2年时C肽值的相关性。将干预组和对照组的数据合并。
在多变量分析的67名研究参与者(平均年龄13.3±5.7岁,范围7.8 - 45.7岁)中,C肽从基线水平升高至2周,然后到6周。这些时间点的C肽水平与1年和2年时的C肽浓度显著相关(所有p<0.001),6周时的C肽与1年和2年时的值之间观察到的关联最强(分别为r = 0.66和r = 0.61)。在多变量分析中,更高的基线和6周时的C肽以及年龄较大独立预测了更高的1年和2年时的C肽浓度。
接近诊断时的C肽评估可预测随后的C肽产生。我们的数据表明,糖尿病诊断后的最初6周内C肽明显升高,随后趋于平稳。我们的数据并不表明在诊断后6周内进行的MMTT评估会改善对随后残余β细胞功能的预测。