• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病学中的非正式强制手段:一项针对十个国家心理健康专业人员态度与经历的焦点小组研究

Informal coercion in psychiatry: a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries.

作者信息

Valenti Emanuele, Banks Ciara, Calcedo-Barba Alfredo, Bensimon Cécile M, Hoffmann Karin-Maria, Pelto-Piri Veikko, Jurin Tanja, Mendoza Octavio Márquez, Mundt Adrian P, Rugkåsa Jorun, Tubini Jacopo, Priebe Stefan

机构信息

Department of Medical Specialties, Psychology and Pedagogy Applied, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Campus Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):1297-308. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1032-3. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-015-1032-3
PMID:25720809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7521205/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Whilst formal coercion in psychiatry is regulated by legislation, other interventions that are often referred to as informal coercion are less regulated. It remains unclear to what extent these interventions are, and how they are used, in mental healthcare. This paper aims to identify the attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals towards the use of informal coercion across countries with differing sociocultural contexts.

METHOD

Focus groups with mental health professionals were conducted in ten countries with different sociocultural contexts (Canada, Chile, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom).

RESULTS

Five common themes were identified: (a) a belief that informal coercion is effective; (b) an often uncomfortable feeling using it; (c) an explicit as well as (d) implicit dissonance between attitudes and practice-with wider use of informal coercion than is thought right in theory; (e) a link to principles of paternalism and responsibility versus respect for the patient's autonomy.

CONCLUSIONS

A disapproval of informal coercion in theory is often overridden in practice. This dissonance occurs across different sociocultural contexts, tends to make professionals feel uneasy, and requires more debate and guidance.

摘要

目的

虽然精神病学中的正式强制手段受到法律规范,但其他常被称为非正式强制的干预措施则较少受到规范。在精神卫生保健中,这些干预措施的程度以及使用方式仍不明确。本文旨在确定不同社会文化背景国家的精神卫生专业人员对使用非正式强制手段的态度和经验。

方法

在十个具有不同社会文化背景的国家(加拿大、智利、克罗地亚、德国、意大利、墨西哥、挪威、西班牙、瑞典、英国)与精神卫生专业人员进行了焦点小组讨论。

结果

确定了五个共同主题:(a)认为非正式强制手段有效;(b)使用时常常感到不舒服;(c)态度与实践之间存在明确以及(d)隐含的不一致——非正式强制手段的使用比理论上认为正确的使用更为广泛;(e)与家长主义原则以及责任与尊重患者自主权之间的联系。

结论

理论上对非正式强制手段的不赞成在实践中常常被推翻。这种不一致在不同社会文化背景中都存在,往往使专业人员感到不安,需要更多的辩论和指导。

相似文献

1
Informal coercion in psychiatry: a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries.精神病学中的非正式强制手段:一项针对十个国家心理健康专业人员态度与经历的焦点小组研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):1297-308. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1032-3. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
2
The significance of ethics reflection groups in mental health care: a focus group study among health care professionals.伦理反思小组在精神卫生保健中的意义:一项针对医护人员的焦点小组研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 5;19(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0297-y.
3
Informal coercion as a neglected form of communication in psychiatric settings in Germany and Switzerland.非形式性强制:德瑞精神科设置中被忽视的沟通形式
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:400-406. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
4
Ethical challenges in connection with the use of coercion: a focus group study of health care personnel in mental health care.与使用强制手段相关的伦理挑战:对精神卫生保健领域医护人员的焦点小组研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Dec 4;15:82. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-82.
5
Further examination of predictors of turnover intention among mental health professionals.对心理健康专业人员离职意向预测因素的进一步研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Feb;24(1):41-56. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12354. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
6
Informal coercion in acute inpatient setting--knowledge and attitudes held by mental health professionals.急性住院环境下的非形式强制——心理健康专业人员的知识和态度。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 30;220(3):1007-11. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
7
Different forms of informal coercion in psychiatry: a qualitative study.精神病学中不同形式的非正式强制手段:一项定性研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Dec 2;12(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4823-x.
8
Knowledge on types of treatment pressure. A cross-sectional study among mental health professionals.关于治疗压力类型的知识。一项针对心理健康专业人员的横断面研究。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018 Oct;32(5):662-669. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
9
Experience of coercion among nursing professionals in a medium-stay mental health unit: A qualitative study in Spain.中等停留时长精神卫生病房护理专业人员中的强迫经历:西班牙的一项定性研究
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Oct;30(5):983-993. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12921. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
10
Between authoritarian and dialogical approaches: Attitudes and opinions on coercion among professionals in mental health and addiction care in Norway.介于专制与对话方法之间:挪威心理健康与成瘾护理专业人员对强制手段的态度与看法。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018 Mar-Apr;57:106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurses' Experiences of Using Coercion in Forensic and Non-Forensic Settings: A Constant Comparative Analysis.护士在法医和非法医环境中使用强制手段的经历:一项持续比较分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Aug;32(4):838-849. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13159. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Dual-roles and beyond: values, ethics, and practices in forensic mental health decision-making.双重角色及其他:法医精神健康决策中的价值观、伦理与实践
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Jun;28(2):199-211. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10247-2. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
3
Prevalence of Current Clinical Leverage and Association with Perceived Coercion in Outpatient and Community Psychiatric Settings: A First in Canada Study.门诊及社区精神科环境中当前临床杠杆作用的患病率及其与感知到的强制力的关联:加拿大的一项首次研究
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01444-7.
4
Exploring Nurses' and Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Coercive and Technological Measures in Mental Health: A Conceptual Framework and Study Protocol.探索护士和护理专业学生对精神卫生领域强制和技术措施的态度:一个概念框架和研究方案。
Nurs Rep. 2024 Dec 20;14(4):4129-4144. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040301.
5
Unethical conduct as a multifaceted phenomenon in psychiatric care: Nurse leaders' perspectives.精神科护理中不道德行为这一多层面现象:护士长的观点。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Jun;32(4):1297-1312. doi: 10.1177/09697330241299523. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
6
Strategies to promote treatment compliance: a grounded theory study with relatives of people with a serious mental health condition.促进治疗依从性的策略:一项基于严重精神健康状况患者亲属的扎根理论研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05907-9.
7
Informal coercion in inpatient mental healthcare: a scoping review protocol.非自愿住院精神卫生保健中的强制手段:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):e079549. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079549.
8
Mental Health Staff's Perspectives on Tapering of Antipsychotic Medication: A Focus Group Study.精神卫生工作人员对抗精神病药物逐渐减量的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Nov;33(13):1165-1176. doi: 10.1177/10497323231195821. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
9
Psychiatric patients' attitudes towards being hospitalized: a national multicentre study in Norway.挪威全国多中心研究:精神科患者对住院治疗的态度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 21;22(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04362-8.
10
Persuasion or coercion? An empirical ethics analysis about the use of influence strategies in mental health community care.劝导还是强迫?关于在精神卫生社区护理中使用影响策略的实证伦理分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 21;22(1):1273. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08555-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Trust, deals and authority: community mental health professionals' experiences of influencing reluctant patients.信任、交易与权威:社区心理健康专业人员影响不情愿患者的经历。
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Nov;50(8):886-95. doi: 10.1007/s10597-014-9720-0. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
2
The use of leverage in community mental health: ethical guidance for practitioners.社区心理健康中的杠杆作用使用:从业者的伦理指导。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;60(8):759-65. doi: 10.1177/0020764013519083. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
3
Effectiveness of financial incentives to improve adherence to maintenance treatment with antipsychotics: cluster randomised controlled trial.经济激励措施对改善抗精神病药物维持治疗依从性的效果:群组随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2013 Oct 7;347:f5847. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5847.
4
The impact of coercion on treatment outcome: one-year follow-up survey.强迫对治疗结果的影响:一年随访调查。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2013;45(3):279-98. doi: 10.2190/PM.45.3.g.
5
Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial.社区治疗令对精神病患者的影响(OCTET):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1627-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-5. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
6
Leverage, the treatment relationship, and treatment participation.利用、治疗关系和治疗参与。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 May 1;64(5):431-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200368.
7
Pressures to adhere to treatment ('leverage') in English mental healthcare.英语心理保健治疗中的坚持治疗压力(“杠杆作用”)。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;199(2):145-50. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.086827.
8
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.针对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub3.
9
Why do some voluntary patients feel coerced into hospitalisation? A mixed-methods study.为什么有些自愿住院的患者会感到被迫住院?一项混合方法研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 May 15;187(1-2):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
10
Acceptability of offering financial incentives to achieve medication adherence in patients with severe mental illness: a focus group study.提供经济激励以提高严重精神疾病患者用药依从性的可接受性:一项焦点小组研究。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Aug;36(8):463-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.035071. Epub 2010 Jun 27.