• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士在临床实践中运用科学知识的体验:一项扎根理论研究。

Nurses experience of using scientific knowledge in clinical practice: a grounded theory study.

作者信息

Renolen Åste, Hjälmhult Esther

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway.

Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bergen University College, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec;29(4):633-41. doi: 10.1111/scs.12191. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1111/scs.12191
PMID:25753736
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend the use of evidence-based practice in nursing. Nurses are expected to give patients care and treatment based on the best knowledge available. They may have knowledge and positive attitudes, but this does not mean that they are basing their work on evidence-based practice. Knowledge is still lacking about what is needed to successfully implement evidence-based practice.

AIM

The aim of this study was to gain more knowledge about what nurses perceive as the most important challenge in implementing evidence-based practice and to explain how they act to face and overcome this challenge.

METHOD

We used classical grounded theory methodology and collected data through four focus groups and one individual interview in different geographical locations in one large hospital trust in Norway. Fourteen registered clinical practice nurses participated. We analysed the data in accordance with grounded theory, using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

Contextual balancing of knowledge emerged as the core category and explains how the nurses dealt with their main concern, how to determine what types of knowledge they could trust. The nurses' main strategies were an inquiring approach, examining knowledge and maintaining control while taking care of patients. They combined their own experienced-based knowledge and the guidelines of evidence-based practice with a sense of control in the actual situation.

CONCLUSION

The grounded theory contextual balancing of knowledge may help us to understand how nurses detect what types of knowledge they can trust in clinical practice. The nurses needed to rely on what they did, and they seemed to rely on their own experience rather than on research.

摘要

背景

指南推荐在护理中采用循证实践。护士应基于现有的最佳知识为患者提供护理和治疗。他们可能具备知识和积极的态度,但这并不意味着他们的工作基于循证实践。对于成功实施循证实践所需的条件仍缺乏了解。

目的

本研究的目的是更深入地了解护士认为在实施循证实践中最重要的挑战是什么,并解释他们如何应对和克服这一挑战。

方法

我们采用经典的扎根理论方法,通过在挪威一家大型医院信托机构的不同地理位置进行的四个焦点小组讨论和一次个人访谈收集数据。14名注册临床实践护士参与其中。我们根据扎根理论,采用持续比较法对数据进行分析。

结果

知识的情境平衡成为核心类别,解释了护士如何处理他们的主要担忧,即如何确定他们可以信任的知识类型。护士的主要策略是探究方法、审视知识并在照顾患者时保持控制。他们将自己基于经验的知识和循证实践指南与实际情况中的控制感相结合。

结论

扎根理论的知识情境平衡可能有助于我们理解护士如何在临床实践中识别他们可以信任的知识类型。护士需要依靠他们所做的事情,而且他们似乎更依赖自己的经验而非研究。

相似文献

1
Nurses experience of using scientific knowledge in clinical practice: a grounded theory study.护士在临床实践中运用科学知识的体验:一项扎根理论研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec;29(4):633-41. doi: 10.1111/scs.12191. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
2
Meanings of knowledge and identity in public health nursing in a time of transition: interpretations of public health nurses' narratives.转型时期公共卫生护理中知识与身份的意义:对公共卫生护士叙事的解读
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec;29(4):679-87. doi: 10.1111/scs.12196. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
3
"Keeping on track"-Hospital nurses' struggles with maintaining workflow while seeking to integrate evidence-based practice into their daily work: A grounded theory study.“保持正轨”-医院护士在努力将循证实践融入日常工作的同时,维持工作流程的挣扎:扎根理论研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Jan;77:179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
Getting to know a stranger--rural nurses' experiences of mentoring: a grounded theory.结识陌生人——乡村护士的指导经历:一项扎根理论研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):599-607. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.12.003. Epub 2007 Feb 5.
5
How grounded theory can improve nursing care quality.扎根理论如何提高护理质量。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2007 Oct-Dec;22(4):350-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000290417.27393.91.
6
District nurses' involvement in pain care: a theoretical model.社区护士在疼痛护理中的参与:一种理论模型。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(15):2022-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02222.x.
7
To have and to hold nutritional control: balancing between individual and routine care. A grounded theory study.拥有并保持营养控制:个体护理与常规护理之间的平衡。一项扎根理论研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009 Jun;25(3):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
8
Nurses' experience of collaboration with relatives of frail elderly patients in acute hospital wards: a qualitative study.急性医院病房中护士与体弱老年患者亲属合作的经验:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 May;45(5):668-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
9
Building the capacity for evidence-based clinical nursing leadership: the role of executive co-coaching and group clinical supervision for quality patient services.培养基于证据的临床护理领导力的能力:执行联合辅导和小组临床督导对优质患者服务的作用。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Mar;15(2):230-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00750.x.
10
Communication--a core concept in client supervision by public health nurses.沟通——公共卫生护士对客户进行监督的核心概念。
J Nurs Manag. 2006 Apr;14(3):235-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00536.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurses' sources of information to inform clinical practice: An integrative review to guide evidence-based practice.护士获取信息以指导临床实践的来源:一项整合性综述,旨在指导循证实践。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Oct;19(5):372-379. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12569. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Research utilization in municipality nursing practice in rural districts in Norway: a cross-sectional quantitative questionnaire study.挪威农村地区市政护理实践中的研究应用:一项横断面定量问卷调查研究。
BMC Nurs. 2020 Sep 14;19:86. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00475-1. eCollection 2020.
3
Evidence-based practice integration in hospital wards-The complexities and challenges in achieving evidence-based practice in clinical nursing.
医院病房中基于证据的实践整合——临床护理中实现基于证据的实践的复杂性和挑战。
Nurs Open. 2019 Mar 18;6(3):815-823. doi: 10.1002/nop2.259. eCollection 2019 Jul.