Suppr超能文献

慢性肾脏病患者冠状动脉钙评估:在心血管疾病风险评估和治疗中的应用?

Coronary Artery Calcium Assessment in CKD: Utility in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment and Treatment?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Department of Cardiology, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Clinical Cardiovascular Science, School of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jun;65(6):937-48. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

Abstract

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular event rates in the general population, and scoring with multislice computed tomography commonly is used to improve risk stratification beyond clinical variables. CAC is accelerated in chronic kidney disease, but this occurs as a result of 2 distinct pathologic processes that result in medial (arteriosclerosis) and intimal (atherosclerosis) deposition. Although there are data that indicate that very high CAC scores may be associated with increased risk of death in hemodialysis, average CAC scores in most patients are elevated at a level at which discriminatory power may be reduced. There is a lack of data to guide management strategies in these patients based on CAC scores. There are even fewer data available for nondialysis patients, and it is uncertain whether CAC score confers an elevated risk of premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in such patients. In this article, we review the evidence regarding the utility of CAC score for noninvasive cardiovascular risk assessment in individuals with chronic kidney disease, using a clinical vignette that highlights some of the limitations in using CAC score and considerations in risk stratification.

摘要

冠状动脉钙化(CAC)是普通人群心血管事件发生率的强有力预测指标,多层计算机断层扫描评分常用于改善临床变量以外的风险分层。慢性肾脏病会加速 CAC 的发展,但这是由导致中层(动脉硬化)和内膜(动脉粥样硬化)沉积的 2 种不同病理过程引起的。虽然有数据表明,CAC 评分非常高可能与血液透析患者的死亡风险增加有关,但大多数患者的平均 CAC 评分升高到了可能降低区分能力的水平。基于 CAC 评分,这些患者的管理策略缺乏指导数据。对于非透析患者的数据更少,尚不确定 CAC 评分是否会增加此类患者发生心血管疾病和过早死亡的风险。在本文中,我们通过一个临床病例来回顾 CAC 评分在慢性肾脏病患者非侵入性心血管风险评估中的作用的证据,该病例强调了使用 CAC 评分的一些局限性和风险分层的考虑因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验