Kym Dohern, Yim Haejun, Yoon Jaechul, Yang Hyeong-Tae, Cho Yong Suk, Hur Jun, Chun Wook, Kim Jong-Hyun
Department of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.
Wound Repair Regen. 2015 May-Jun;23(3):340-4. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12279. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
This prospective observational study was performed to analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with massive burns treated using cultured epithelial autografts (CEAs) and to determine the association of this treatment with survival outcomes. During 2006-2013, total 177 massive-burns subjects treated with (96 subjects) or without (81 subjects) CEAs. Data were analyzed using the independent t test or chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival, and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the factors that influenced mortality. Age, percentage of total body surface area burned, incidence of inhalation injury, allograft-application rate, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index score, length of hospital stay, and mortality significantly differed between the CEA and noncultured epithelial autograft groups. Mortality and other clinical parameters did not differ between the sheet-type and spray-type CEA groups. Allograft application (odds ratio, 4.44; p < 0.01) significantly influenced CEA application. The CEA group showed significantly higher survival rates (p = 0.05). Cultured epithelial autografting had a hazard ratio of 0.55 (p = 0.02) and 0.59 (p = 0.05) according to the uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis, respectively. In conclusion, early and aggressive allograft application is required to facilitate CEA application. Furthermore, the use of CEAs was associated with a lower mortality, but this result should be interpreted with caution as the groups were not randomized.
本前瞻性观察性研究旨在分析采用培养的自体上皮移植(CEA)治疗大面积烧伤患者的临床结局,并确定该治疗方法与生存结局之间的关联。在2006年至2013年期间,共有177名大面积烧伤患者,其中96名接受了CEA治疗,81名未接受CEA治疗。数据采用独立t检验或卡方检验进行分析。进行多因素逻辑回归、Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox回归分析以评估影响死亡率的因素。CEA组和非培养自体上皮移植组在年龄、烧伤总面积百分比、吸入性损伤发生率、异体皮应用率、简化烧伤严重程度指数评分、住院时间和死亡率方面存在显著差异。片状和喷雾状CEA组之间的死亡率和其他临床参数无差异。异体皮应用(比值比,4.44;p<0.01)对CEA应用有显著影响。CEA组的生存率显著更高(p=0.05)。根据单因素和多因素Cox回归分析,培养的自体上皮移植的风险比分别为0.55(p=0.02)和0.59(p=0.05)。总之,需要早期积极应用异体皮以促进CEA应用。此外,CEA的使用与较低的死亡率相关,但由于各组未进行随机分组,该结果应谨慎解读。