Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jan;48(1):250-8. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.324. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
We compared the predictive and prognostic values of leukocyte differential counts, systemic inflammatory (SIR) markers and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels, and identified the most useful marker in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).
The study included 109 patients with OCCC who did not have any inflammatory conditions except endometriosis, and underwent primary debulking surgery between 1997 and 2012. Leukocyte differential counts (neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, basophil, and platelet), SIR markers including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and CA-125 levels were estimated to select potential markers for clinical outcomes.
Among potential markers (neutrophil, monocyte, platelet, NLR, MLR, PLR, and CA-125 levels) selected by stepwise comparison, CA-125 levels were best at predicting advanced stage disease, suboptimal debulking and platinum-resistance (cut-off values, ≥ 46.5, ≥ 11.45, and ≥ 66.4 U/mL; accuracies, 69.4%, 78.7%, and 68.5%) while PLR ≥ 205.4 predicted non-complete response (CR; accuracy, 71.6%) most accurately. Moreover, PLR < 205.4 was an independent factor for the reduced risk of non-CR (adjusted odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.69), and NLR < 2.8 was a favorable factor for improved progression-free survival (PFS; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.99) despite lack of a marker for overall survival among the potential markers.
CA-125 levels may be the most useful marker for predicting advanced-stage disease. Suboptimal debulking and platinum-resistance, and PLR and NLR may be most effective to predict non-CR and PFS in patients with OCCC.
我们比较了白细胞分类计数、全身性炎症(SIR)标志物和癌抗原 125(CA-125)水平的预测和预后价值,并确定了在卵巢透明细胞癌(OCCC)患者中最有用的标志物。
本研究纳入了 109 例无炎症性疾病(除子宫内膜异位症外)的 OCCC 患者,这些患者于 1997 年至 2012 年间接受了初次肿瘤细胞减灭术。白细胞分类计数(中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞、单核细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞、嗜碱性粒细胞和血小板)、SIR 标志物(包括中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 NLR、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值 MLR 和血小板与淋巴细胞比值 PLR)和 CA-125 水平被评估以选择对临床结局有潜在意义的标志物。
在逐步比较中选择的潜在标志物(中性粒细胞、单核细胞、血小板、NLR、MLR、PLR 和 CA-125 水平)中,CA-125 水平在预测晚期疾病、减瘤不完全和铂耐药方面表现最佳(截断值分别为≥46.5、≥11.45 和≥66.4 U/mL;准确性分别为 69.4%、78.7%和 68.5%),而 PLR≥205.4 最准确地预测非完全缓解(CR;准确性为 71.6%)。此外,PLR<205.4 是降低非 CR 风险的独立因素(调整优势比,0.17;95%置信区间 [CI],0.04 至 0.69),NLR<2.8 是改善无进展生存期(PFS;调整风险比,0.49;95%CI,0.25 至 0.99)的有利因素,尽管在潜在标志物中没有一个标志物用于总生存期。
CA-125 水平可能是预测晚期疾病最有用的标志物。对于 OCCC 患者,减瘤不完全和铂耐药以及 PLR 和 NLR 可能最能有效预测非 CR 和 PFS。