• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物不良事件发生率的回顾性研究及促成触发因素分析

A retrospective study on the incidences of adverse drug events and analysis of the contributing trigger factors.

作者信息

Sam Aaseer Thamby, Lian Jessica Looi Li, Parasuraman Subramani

机构信息

Unit of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, Bedong 08100, Kedah, Malaysia.

Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, Bedong 08100, Kedah, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Basic Clin Pharm. 2015 Mar;6(2):64-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.152095.

DOI:10.4103/0976-0105.152095
PMID:25767366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4357002/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively determine the extent and types of adverse drug events (ADEs) from the patient cases sheets and identify the contributing factors of medication errors. To assess causality and severity using the World Health Organization (WHO) probability scale and Hartwig's scale, respectively.

METHODS

Hundred patient case sheets were randomly selected, modified version of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Global Trigger Tool was utilized to identify the ADEs; causality and severity were calculated utilizing the WHO probability scale and Hartwig's severity assessment scale, respectively.

RESULTS

In total, 153 adverse events (AEs) were identified using the IHI Global Trigger Tool. Majority of the AEs are due to medication errors (46.41%) followed by 60 adverse drug reactions (ADRs), 15 therapeutic failure incidents, and 7 over-dose cases. Out of the 153 AEs, 60 are due to ADRs such as rashes, nausea, and vomiting. Therapeutic failure contributes 9.80% of the AEs, while overdose contributes to 4.58% of the total 153 AEs. Using the trigger tools, we were able to detect 45 positive triggers in 36 patient records. Among it, 19 AEs were identified in 15 patient records. The percentage of AE/100 patients is 17%. The average ADEs/1000 doses is 2.03% (calculated).

CONCLUSION

The IHI Global Trigger Tool is an effective method to aid provisionally-registered pharmacists to identify ADEs quicker.

摘要

目的

回顾性地确定患者病历中药物不良事件(ADEs)的范围和类型,并识别用药错误的促成因素。分别使用世界卫生组织(WHO)概率量表和哈特维希量表评估因果关系和严重程度。

方法

随机抽取100份患者病历,使用医疗改进研究所(IHI)全球触发工具的修改版来识别ADEs;分别使用WHO概率量表和哈特维希严重程度评估量表计算因果关系和严重程度。

结果

使用IHI全球触发工具共识别出153起不良事件(AEs)。大多数AE是由用药错误引起的(46.41%),其次是60起药物不良反应(ADRs)、15起治疗失败事件和7起过量用药病例。在153起AE中,60起是由ADR引起的,如皮疹、恶心和呕吐。治疗失败占AE的9.80%,过量用药占153起AE总数的4.58%。使用触发工具,我们在36份患者记录中检测到45个阳性触发因素。其中,在15份患者记录中识别出19起AE。AE/100患者的百分比为17%。平均ADEs/1000剂量为2.03%(计算得出)。

结论

IHI全球触发工具是一种有效的方法,可帮助临时注册药剂师更快地识别ADEs。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce13/4357002/5605175e3be0/JBCP-6-64-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce13/4357002/b5e81e6dbd1b/JBCP-6-64-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce13/4357002/5605175e3be0/JBCP-6-64-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce13/4357002/b5e81e6dbd1b/JBCP-6-64-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce13/4357002/5605175e3be0/JBCP-6-64-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A retrospective study on the incidences of adverse drug events and analysis of the contributing trigger factors.药物不良事件发生率的回顾性研究及促成触发因素分析
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2015 Mar;6(2):64-8. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.152095.
2
Performance of the adverse drug event trigger tool and the global trigger tool for identifying adverse drug events: experience in a Belgian hospital.不良药物事件触发工具和全球触发工具在识别不良药物事件中的性能:比利时一家医院的经验。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Nov;47(11):1414-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028013500939.
3
Establishing a trigger tool based on global trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in obstetric inpatients in China.建立基于全球触发工具的触发工具,以识别中国产科住院患者的药物不良事件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 15;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10449-z.
4
A targeted method for standardized assessment of adverse drug events in surgical patients.一种针对手术患者药物不良事件的标准化评估的靶向方法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Dec;19(6):1073-82. doi: 10.1111/jep.12033. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
5
Global Trigger Tool: Proficient Adverse Drug Reaction Autodetection Method in Critical Care Patient Units.全球触发工具:重症监护病房中熟练的药物不良反应自动检测方法
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;24(3):172-178. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23367.
6
Identification of risk factors for adverse drug events in a general hospital.识别综合医院中药物不良事件的风险因素。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Sep 17;36(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae088.
7
An adverse event trigger tool in dentistry: a new methodology for measuring harm in the dental office.牙科不良事件触发工具:一种测量牙科诊所伤害的新方法。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jul;144(7):808-14. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0191.
8
Assessment of the reliability of the IHI Global Trigger Tool: new perspectives from a Brazilian study.评估 IHI 全球触发工具的可靠性:来自巴西研究的新视角。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 18;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab039.
9
Evaluation of accuracy of IHI Trigger Tool in identifying adverse drug events: a prospective observational study.评估 IHI 触发工具识别药物不良事件的准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;84(10):2252-2259. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13665. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
10
Assessing the development and implementation of the Global Trigger Tool method across a large health system in Sicily.评估全球触发工具方法在西西里岛一个大型医疗系统中的开发与实施情况。
F1000Res. 2019 Mar 7;8:263. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18025.4. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing a trigger tool based on global trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in obstetric inpatients in China.建立基于全球触发工具的触发工具,以识别中国产科住院患者的药物不良事件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 15;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10449-z.
2
Development and Implementation of an e-Trigger Tool for Adverse Drug Events in a Swiss University Hospital.瑞士大学医院药物不良事件电子触发工具的开发与实施
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 24;13:251-263. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S334987. eCollection 2021.
3
An evaluation of trigger tool method for adverse drug reaction monitoring at a tertiary care teaching hospital.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program regimens with and without directly observed treatment, short-course: A comparative study of therapeutic cure rate and adverse reactions.修订的国家结核病控制规划短程治疗方案(有无直接观察治疗):治疗治愈率和不良反应的比较研究
Perspect Clin Res. 2014 Jan;5(1):16-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.124557.
2
Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of Hypertension among the elderly: the 2006 National Health and Morbidity Survey III in Malaysia.马来西亚老年人高血压的患病率、知晓率、治疗率及控制率:2006年第三次全国健康与发病率调查
Med J Malaysia. 2013 Aug;68(4):332-7.
3
Estimation of plasma levels of warfarin and 7-hydroxy warfarin by high performance liquid chromatography in patients receiving warfarin therapy.
三级护理教学医院药物不良反应监测触发工具方法的评估
Perspect Clin Res. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):33-39. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_30_19. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
4
Adverse Drug Events and Contributing Factors Among Hospitalized Adult Patients at Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia: A Prospective Observational Study.埃塞俄比亚西南部吉马医疗中心住院成年患者的药物不良事件及相关因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020 Oct 29;93:100611. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2020.100611. eCollection 2020.
5
Practice-Based Research in Complementary Medicine: Could N-of-1 Trials Become the New Gold Standard?补充医学中基于实践的研究:单病例试验会成为新的金标准吗?
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jan 8;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010015.
6
Evaluation of accuracy of IHI Trigger Tool in identifying adverse drug events: a prospective observational study.评估 IHI 触发工具识别药物不良事件的准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;84(10):2252-2259. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13665. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
7
Adverse drug reactions in the era of multi-morbidity and polypharmacy.多病共存和多种药物联合使用时代的药物不良反应
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2015 Sep;6(4):122-3. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.168052.
采用高效液相色谱法测定接受华法林治疗患者的血浆华法林及7-羟基华法林水平。
J Young Pharm. 2013 Mar;5(1):13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jyp.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
4
Prevalence of Chronic Illness and Health Seeking Behaviour in Malaysian Population: Results from the Third National Health Morbidity Survey (NHMS III) 2006.马来西亚人口慢性病患病率及求医行为:2006年第三次全国健康与发病率调查(NHMS III)结果
Med J Malaysia. 2011 Mar;66(1):36-41.
5
Pattern of Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors induced adverse drug reactions in South Indian teaching hospital.南印度教学医院中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂引起的药物不良反应模式
N Am J Med Sci. 2012 Apr;4(4):185-9. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.94945.
6
Drug-drug interactions in hospitalized cardiac patients.住院心脏病患者的药物相互作用。
J Young Pharm. 2011 Oct;3(4):329-33. doi: 10.4103/0975-1483.90246.
7
A study of adverse drug reactions in pediatric patients.一项关于儿科患者药物不良反应的研究。
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011 Oct;2(4):277-80. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.85957.
8
The incidence and nature of drug-related hospital admission: A 6-month observational study in a tertiary health care hospital.与药物相关的住院情况的发生率及性质:在一家三级医疗保健医院进行的为期6个月的观察性研究。
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011 Jan;2(1):17-20. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.77095.
9
Detecting Adverse Drug Events Using a Nursing Home Specific Trigger Tool.使用特定于疗养院的触发工具检测药物不良事件。
Ann Longterm Care. 2010 May;18(5):17-22.
10
Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals I: occurrence and impact.新西兰公立医院的不良事件I:发生率与影响
N Z Med J. 2002 Dec 13;115(1167):U271.