Sulheim Dag, Fagermoen Even, Sivertsen Øyvind Stople, Winger Anette, Wyller Vegard Bruun, Øie Merete Glenne
Department of Paediatrics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway Department of Paediatrics, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway.
Medical Faculty, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Sep;100(9):838-44. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306764. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
To compare cognitive function in adolescents with chronic fatigue with cognitive function in healthy controls (HC).
Cross-sectional study.
Paediatric department at Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
120 adolescents with chronic fatigue (average age 15.4 years; range 12-18) and 39 HC (average age 15.2 years; range 12-18).
The adolescents completed a neurocognitive test battery measuring processing speed, working memory, cognitive inhibition, cognitive flexibility, verbal learning and verbal memory, and questionnaires addressing demographic data, depression symptoms, anxiety traits, fatigue and sleep problems. Parents completed the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), which measures the everyday executive functions of children.
Adolescents with chronic fatigue had impaired cognitive function compared to HC regarding processing speed (mean difference 3.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.5, p=0.003), working memory (-2.4, -3.7 to -1.1, p<0.001), cognitive inhibition response time (6.2, 0.8 to 11.7, p=0.025) and verbal learning (-1.7, -3.2 to -0.3, p=0.022). The BRIEF results indicated that everyday executive functions were significantly worse in the chronic fatigue group compared to the HC (11.2, 8.2 to 14.3, p<0.001). Group differences remained largely unaffected when adjusted for symptoms of depression, anxiety traits and sleep problems.
Adolescents with chronic fatigue had impaired cognitive function of clinical relevance, measured by objective cognitive tests, in comparison to HC. Working memory and processing speed may represent core difficulties.
比较慢性疲劳青少年与健康对照者(HC)的认知功能。
横断面研究。
挪威奥斯陆大学医院儿科。
120名慢性疲劳青少年(平均年龄15.4岁;范围12 - 18岁)和39名健康对照者(平均年龄15.2岁;范围12 - 18岁)。
青少年完成一组神经认知测试,测量处理速度、工作记忆、认知抑制、认知灵活性、言语学习和言语记忆,并填写关于人口统计学数据、抑郁症状、焦虑特质、疲劳和睡眠问题的问卷。家长完成执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF),该量表用于测量儿童的日常执行功能。
与健康对照者相比,慢性疲劳青少年在处理速度(平均差异3.3,95%可信区间1.1至5.5,p = 0.003)、工作记忆(-2.4,-3.7至-1.1,p < 0.001)、认知抑制反应时间(6.2,0.8至11.7,p = 0.025)和言语学习(-1.7,-3.2至-0.3,p = 0.022)方面存在认知功能受损。BRIEF结果表明,慢性疲劳组的日常执行功能明显比健康对照者差(11.2,8.2至14.3,p < 0.001)。在对抑郁症状、焦虑特质和睡眠问题进行调整后,组间差异基本不受影响。
与健康对照者相比,通过客观认知测试测量,慢性疲劳青少年存在具有临床意义的认知功能受损。工作记忆和处理速度可能是核心难点。