• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竞争经历增强果蝇的攻击性行为:当失败者学会获胜时。

Contest experience enhances aggressive behaviour in a fly: when losers learn to win.

作者信息

Benelli Giovanni, Desneux Nicolas, Romano Donato, Conte Giuseppe, Messing Russell H, Canale Angelo

机构信息

Insect Behaviour Group, Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy.

French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), Sophia-Antipolis, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 20;5:9347. doi: 10.1038/srep09347.

DOI:10.1038/srep09347
PMID:25792294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7365324/
Abstract

In several animal species, aggressive experience influences the characteristics and outcomes of subsequent conflicts, such that winners are more likely to win again (the winner effect) and losers more likely to lose again (the loser effect). We tested the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae), as a model system to evaluate the role of the winner and loser effects in male-male territorial contests. Further, we conducted experiments to test if winning and losing probabilities are affected only by the outcome of the previous contests, or whether the fighting experience itself is sufficient to induce an effect. Both winners and losers of two consecutive encounters displayed higher intensity of aggression and fought longer in subsequent contests. In both cases, they achieved higher fighting success than naïve males. The enhanced fighting performance of both winners and losers was stimulated by merely experiencing a contest, not necessarily by the relative outcome of previous fights. Overall, this study highlights the fact that previous victories and defeats both enhance aggressive behaviour in olive fruit flies, allowing them to achieve higher fighting success in subsequent contests against inexperienced males.

摘要

在几种动物物种中,攻击性经历会影响后续冲突的特征和结果,使得胜者更有可能再次获胜(胜者效应),而败者更有可能再次失败(败者效应)。我们以地中海实蝇(双翅目:实蝇科)作为模型系统,来评估胜者效应和败者效应在雄性间领地竞争中的作用。此外,我们进行了实验,以测试胜负概率是否仅受先前竞争结果的影响,或者战斗经历本身是否足以产生一种效应。连续两次交锋的胜者和败者在后续竞争中都表现出更高的攻击强度,战斗时间也更长。在这两种情况下,它们都比无经验的雄性取得了更高的战斗成功率。胜者和败者战斗表现的增强仅仅是通过经历一场竞争刺激的,不一定是由先前战斗的相对结果导致的。总体而言,这项研究凸显了这样一个事实,即先前的胜利和失败都会增强地中海实蝇的攻击行为,使它们在后续与无经验雄性的竞争中取得更高的战斗成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94b/7365324/b12aefcf8de9/41598_2015_Article_BFsrep09347_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94b/7365324/5ef901628ab2/41598_2015_Article_BFsrep09347_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94b/7365324/eb2e509b00f5/41598_2015_Article_BFsrep09347_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94b/7365324/b12aefcf8de9/41598_2015_Article_BFsrep09347_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94b/7365324/5ef901628ab2/41598_2015_Article_BFsrep09347_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94b/7365324/eb2e509b00f5/41598_2015_Article_BFsrep09347_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94b/7365324/b12aefcf8de9/41598_2015_Article_BFsrep09347_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Contest experience enhances aggressive behaviour in a fly: when losers learn to win.竞争经历增强果蝇的攻击性行为:当失败者学会获胜时。
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 20;5:9347. doi: 10.1038/srep09347.
2
Strategy changes in subsequent fights as consequences of winning and losing in fruit fly fights.果蝇争斗中输赢导致后续争斗的策略变化。
Fly (Austin). 2017 Apr 3;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1080/19336934.2016.1259041. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
3
Why do winners keep winning? Androgen mediation of winner but not loser effects in cichlid fish.为什么赢家不断获胜?丽鱼科鱼类中雄激素对赢家效应而非输家效应的介导作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2249-56. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0132. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
4
The hidden links between animal weapons, fighting style, and their effect on contest success: a meta-analysis.动物武器、打斗风格及其对竞争成功影响之间的隐藏联系:一项荟萃分析。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Oct;97(5):1948-1966. doi: 10.1111/brv.12877. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
5
Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes.战斗经验对攻击性行为的调节:机制与竞争结果
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 Feb;81(1):33-74. doi: 10.1017/S146479310500686X.
6
Winner and loser effects in lobster cockroach contests for social dominance.龙虾蟑螂社会统治地位竞争中的胜利者和失败者效应。
Horm Behav. 2019 Jan;107:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Does losing reduce the tendency to engage with rivals to reach mates? An experimental test.失去会降低与竞争对手争夺配偶的倾向吗?一项实验测试。
Behav Ecol. 2024 May 3;35(4):arae037. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arae037. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
8
Learning and memory associated with aggression in Drosophila melanogaster.与黑腹果蝇攻击行为相关的学习与记忆
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 14;103(46):17519-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608211103. Epub 2006 Nov 6.
9
Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking.窃听绿剑尾鱼(Xiphophorus helleri)争斗中的视觉线索:一个关于信息交流的案例
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):943-52. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1973.
10
Does the winner-loser effect determine male mating success?胜负效应是否决定了雄性的交配成功?
Biol Lett. 2018 May;14(5). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0195.

引用本文的文献

1
Aggressiveness predicts dominance rank in greylag geese: mirror tests and agonistic interactions.攻击性预示着灰雁的等级地位:镜子测试与争斗互动
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Apr 3;11(4):231686. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231686. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Learning from fights: Males' social dominance status impact reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster.从战斗中学习:果蝇雄性的社会支配地位对其繁殖成功率的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299839. eCollection 2024.
3
The evolutionarily stable strategy, animal contests, parasitoids, pest control and sociality.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.《物种起源》:通过自然选择,即生存斗争中有利种族的保存
Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1860 Apr;25(50):367-404.
2
The role of prior agonistic experience in dominance relationships in male crickets Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).先前的争斗经验在双斑蟋(直翅目:蟋蟀科)雄性优势关系中的作用。
Behav Processes. 1999 Mar 1;44(3):341-8. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00058-8.
3
Selecting dominants and subordinates at conflict outcome can confound the effects of prior dominance or subordination experience.
进化稳定策略、动物竞争、寄生蜂、害虫防治和社会性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 May 8;378(1876):20210498. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0498. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
4
The Neural Circuit Architecture of Social Hierarchy in Rodents and Primates.啮齿动物和灵长类动物社会等级制度的神经回路结构
Front Cell Neurosci. 2022 May 12;16:874310. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.874310. eCollection 2022.
5
Old Parasitoids for New Mealybugs: Host Location Behavior and Parasitization Efficacy of on .用于防治新粉蚧的旧寄生蜂:[具体寄生蜂名称]对[具体粉蚧名称]的寄主定位行为及寄生效能
Insects. 2021 Mar 18;12(3):257. doi: 10.3390/insects12030257.
6
The influence of male dominance in female Anastrepha curvicauda mate selection.雄性优势对雌性弯尾果蝇交配选择的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 18;11(1):6311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85823-0.
7
Multiple Mating in the Citrophilous Mealybug : Implications for Mating Disruption.嗜果小粉蚧的多次交配:对交配干扰的影响
Insects. 2019 Sep 5;10(9):285. doi: 10.3390/insects10090285.
8
The fight to understand fighting: neurogenetic approaches to the study of aggression in insects.为理解争斗而奋斗:神经遗传学方法在昆虫攻击行为研究中的应用。
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2019 Dec;36:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
Direct measurement of fight or flight behavior in a beetle reveals individual variation and the influence of parasitism.在甲虫中直接测量战斗或逃跑行为揭示了个体差异和寄生虫的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 May 22;14(5):e0216387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216387. eCollection 2019.
10
Multiple cues produced by a robotic fish modulate aggressive behaviour in Siamese fighting fishes.机器鱼产生的多种线索调节暹罗斗鱼的攻击行为。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 5;7(1):4667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04840-0.
在冲突结果中选择主导者和从属者可能会混淆先前主导或从属经历的影响。
Behav Processes. 1996 Jun;36(3):219-26. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00031-3.
4
Variation between self- and mutual assessment in animal contests.动物竞争中自我评估与相互评估之间的差异。
Am Nat. 2014 Feb;183(2):199-213. doi: 10.1086/674443. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
5
Male-male sexual behavior in the parasitic wasp Psyttalia concolor.雄性寄生蜂 Psyttalia concolor 的雄性-雄性性行为。
J Insect Sci. 2013;13:25. doi: 10.1673/031.013.2501.
6
Mechanisms of experience dependent control of aggression in crickets.蟋蟀中依赖经验控制攻击的机制。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
7
The decision to fight or flee - insights into underlying mechanism in crickets.战斗或逃跑的抉择——对蟋蟀潜在机制的洞察
Front Neurosci. 2012 Aug 21;6:118. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00118. eCollection 2012.
8
Previous experience and contest outcome: winner effects persist in absence of evident loser effects in a parasitoid wasp.先前经验和竞赛结果:在寄生蜂中,胜利者效应持续存在,而明显的失败者效应并不存在。
Am Nat. 2012 Sep;180(3):364-71. doi: 10.1086/667192. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
9
Genetics and neurobiology of aggression in Drosophila.果蝇攻击行为的遗传学与神经生物学
Fly (Austin). 2012 Jan-Mar;6(1):35-48. doi: 10.4161/fly.19249. Epub 2012 Jan 1.
10
Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects.对先前竞赛经历以及胜者和败者效应的持续性进行考察。
Behav Ecol. 2010 Mar;21(2):404-409. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arp204. Epub 2010 Jan 27.