• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有异质偏好的小群体对人群疏散行为演变的影响。

Impact of small groups with heterogeneous preference on behavioral evolution in population evacuation.

作者信息

Wang Tao, Huang Keke, Wang Zhen, Zheng Xiaoping

机构信息

Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, Kasuga-koen, Kasuga-shi, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0121949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121949. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0121949
PMID:25793637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4367991/
Abstract

Up to now, there have been a great number of mechanisms to explain the individual behavior and population traits, which seem of particular significance in evolutionary biology and social behavior analysis. Among them, small groups and heterogeneity are two useful frameworks to the above issue. However, vast majority of existing works separately consider both scenarios, which is inconsistent with realistic cases in our life. Here we propose the evolutionary games of heterogeneous small groups (namely, different small groups possess different preferences to dilemma) to study the collective behavior in population evacuation. Importantly, players usually face completely different dilemmas inside and outside the small groups. By means of numerous computation simulations, it is unveiled that the ratio of players in one certain small group directly decides the final behavior of the whole population. Moreover, it can also be concluded that heterogeneous degree of preference for different small groups plays a key role in the behavior traits of the system, which may validate some realistic social observations. The proposed framework is thus universally applicable and may shed new light into the solution of social dilemmas.

摘要

到目前为止,已经有大量的机制来解释个体行为和群体特征,这在进化生物学和社会行为分析中似乎具有特别重要的意义。其中,小群体和异质性是解决上述问题的两个有用框架。然而,绝大多数现有研究分别考虑这两种情况,这与我们生活中的实际情况不符。在此,我们提出异质小群体的进化博弈(即不同的小群体对困境有不同的偏好)来研究群体疏散中的集体行为。重要的是,参与者在小群体内部和外部通常面临完全不同的困境。通过大量的计算模拟发现,某个特定小群体中参与者的比例直接决定了整个群体的最终行为。此外,还可以得出结论,不同小群体偏好的异质程度在系统的行为特征中起着关键作用,这可能验证一些现实社会观察结果。因此,所提出的框架具有普遍适用性,可能为解决社会困境提供新的思路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/5d7ffa7aea6f/pone.0121949.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/2bfd10044f10/pone.0121949.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/671ec1e33229/pone.0121949.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/4b08f78a14ef/pone.0121949.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/77691bd00e86/pone.0121949.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/9f7ef832f49d/pone.0121949.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/a88781e8a9c6/pone.0121949.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/5d7ffa7aea6f/pone.0121949.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/2bfd10044f10/pone.0121949.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/671ec1e33229/pone.0121949.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/4b08f78a14ef/pone.0121949.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/77691bd00e86/pone.0121949.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/9f7ef832f49d/pone.0121949.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/a88781e8a9c6/pone.0121949.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f154/4367991/5d7ffa7aea6f/pone.0121949.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of small groups with heterogeneous preference on behavioral evolution in population evacuation.具有异质偏好的小群体对人群疏散行为演变的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0121949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121949. eCollection 2015.
2
An application of evolutionary game theory to social dilemmas: the traveler's dilemma and the minimum effort coordination game.进化博弈论在社会困境中的应用:旅行者困境与最小努力协调博弈。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e93988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093988. eCollection 2014.
3
Generalized Social Dilemmas: The Evolution of Cooperation in Populations with Variable Group Size.广义社会困境:变群组大小的群体中合作的演化。
Bull Math Biol. 2019 Nov;81(11):4643-4674. doi: 10.1007/s11538-018-00545-1. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
4
Leaders should not be conformists in evolutionary social dilemmas.在进化社会困境中,领导者不应随波逐流。
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 23;6:23633. doi: 10.1038/srep23633.
5
Towards a rigorous framework for studying 2-player continuous games.迈向严格的二人连续对策研究框架。
J Theor Biol. 2013 Mar 21;321:40-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.12.026. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
6
Universal scaling for the dilemma strength in evolutionary games.普适标度下进化博弈中的困境强度。
Phys Life Rev. 2015 Sep;14:1-30. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.033. Epub 2015 May 5.
7
Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games.推断声誉促进空间社会困境博弈中的合作进化。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040218. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
8
Adaptive role switching promotes fairness in networked ultimatum game.自适应角色转换促进网络最后通牒博弈中的公平性。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1550. doi: 10.1038/srep01550.
9
Evolutionary Game Model of Group Choice Dilemmas on Hypergraphs.超图上的群体选择困境的演化博弈模型。
Phys Rev Lett. 2021 Dec 24;127(26):268301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.268301.
10
Evolutionary dynamics of group fairness.群体公平性的进化动态
J Theor Biol. 2015 Aug 7;378:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks.多层网络的结构与动态特性
Phys Rep. 2014 Nov 1;544(1):1-122. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
2
Role of investment heterogeneity in the cooperation on spatial public goods game.投资异质性在空间公共物品博弈合作中的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 14;9(3):e91012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091012. eCollection 2014.
3
Spontaneous symmetry breaking in interdependent networked game.相互依存网络博弈中的自发对称性破缺
Sci Rep. 2014 Feb 14;4:4095. doi: 10.1038/srep04095.
4
Insight into the so-called spatial reciprocity.对所谓空间互易性的洞察。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Oct;88(4):042145. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.042145. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
5
Impact of social punishment on cooperative behavior in complex networks.社会惩罚对复杂网络中合作行为的影响。
Sci Rep. 2013 Oct 28;3:3055. doi: 10.1038/srep03055.
6
Interdependent network reciprocity in evolutionary games.进化博弈中的相依网络互惠
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1183. doi: 10.1038/srep01183. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
7
Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.一次性匿名最后通牒博弈中的公平性演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 12;110(7):2581-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214167110. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
8
Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review.结构种群中群体相互作用的进化动态:综述。
J R Soc Interface. 2013 Jan 9;10(80):20120997. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0997. Print 2013 Mar 6.
9
Vision-based analysis of small groups in pedestrian crowds.基于视觉的行人中小群体分析。
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2012 May;34(5):1003-16. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.176.
10
Heterogeneous aspirations promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game.异质期望促进囚徒困境博弈中的合作。
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 6;5(12):e15117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015117.