Latorre-Román Pedro Ángel, Izquierdo-Sánchez Jose Manuel, Salas-Sánchez Jesús, García-Pinillos Felipe
Department of Didactics of Corporal Expression, University of Jaen, Jaén, Spain..
Universidad Autónoma de Chile..
Nutr Hosp. 2015 Apr 1;31(4):1717-25. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.31.4.8479.
To analyze the body composition, strength level, and the quality of life related to the health (QoL) in veteran sportsmen (>35 years old) in relation to sedentary ones (S), and to compare the result in the mentioned variables between two models of sports practice, long-distance runners (LDR) and bodybuilding practitioners (BBP).
One hundred forty-eight male participants took part and were distributed into three groups: 47 LDR (age=42.01±6.96 years), 49 BBP (age=45.14±7.04 years), and 47 S (age=43.71±8.75 years). Body composition, upper- and lower-limb strength level, and QoL were assessed.
The LDR and BBP obtained better performance in countermovement jump (CMJ) than the S ones (+0.06 m, p<0.001). Significant differences were found in BMI and %fat mass, between BBP and S with relation to LDR (p<0.001). In relation to the effect of aging on body composition, the muscle mass is reduced in all groups controlled (LDR, BBP, and S). Additionally, the %fat mass is increased only in S group (p< 0.05). The CMJ performance is significantly reduced only in S group (-0.07 m, p<0.001).
The results suggested that the LDR as a model of active aging showed healthier values in BMI and %fat mass as well as greater results in QoL than BBP and S groups. Nevertheless, the LDR group showed similar values to S ones in muscle mass. The regression analysis performed showed that the sedentary habit predicts the %fat mass and CMJ performance.
分析老年运动员(>35岁)相对于久坐不动者(S)的身体成分、力量水平以及与健康相关的生活质量(QoL),并比较两种运动模式(长跑运动员(LDR)和健美运动员(BBP))在上述变量上的结果。
148名男性参与者参与并被分为三组:47名长跑运动员(年龄=42.01±6.96岁),49名健美运动员(年龄=45.14±7.04岁),以及47名久坐不动者(年龄=43.71±8.75岁)。评估身体成分、上肢和下肢力量水平以及生活质量。
长跑运动员和健美运动员在反向纵跳(CMJ)中的表现优于久坐不动者(+0.06米,p<0.001)。在体重指数(BMI)和体脂百分比方面,健美运动员与久坐不动者相比,相对于长跑运动员存在显著差异(p<0.001)。关于衰老对身体成分的影响,所有对照组(长跑运动员、健美运动员和久坐不动者)的肌肉量均减少。此外,仅久坐不动者组的体脂百分比增加(p<0.05)。仅久坐不动者组的CMJ表现显著降低(-0.07米,p<0.001)。
结果表明,作为积极老龄化模式的长跑运动员在BMI和体脂百分比方面显示出更健康的值,并且在生活质量方面比健美运动员和久坐不动者组有更好的结果。然而,长跑运动员组在肌肉量方面与久坐不动者组的值相似。进行的回归分析表明,久坐习惯可预测体脂百分比和CMJ表现。