• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种积极老龄化模式之间的比较分析及其对身体成分、力量水平和生活质量的影响:长跑运动员与健美运动员。

Comparative analysis between two models of active aging and its influence on body composition, strength levels and quality of life: long-distance runners versus bodybuilders practitioners.

作者信息

Latorre-Román Pedro Ángel, Izquierdo-Sánchez Jose Manuel, Salas-Sánchez Jesús, García-Pinillos Felipe

机构信息

Department of Didactics of Corporal Expression, University of Jaen, Jaén, Spain..

Universidad Autónoma de Chile..

出版信息

Nutr Hosp. 2015 Apr 1;31(4):1717-25. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.31.4.8479.

DOI:10.3305/nh.2015.31.4.8479
PMID:25795963
Abstract

AIM

To analyze the body composition, strength level, and the quality of life related to the health (QoL) in veteran sportsmen (>35 years old) in relation to sedentary ones (S), and to compare the result in the mentioned variables between two models of sports practice, long-distance runners (LDR) and bodybuilding practitioners (BBP).

METHODS

One hundred forty-eight male participants took part and were distributed into three groups: 47 LDR (age=42.01±6.96 years), 49 BBP (age=45.14±7.04 years), and 47 S (age=43.71±8.75 years). Body composition, upper- and lower-limb strength level, and QoL were assessed.

RESULTS

The LDR and BBP obtained better performance in countermovement jump (CMJ) than the S ones (+0.06 m, p<0.001). Significant differences were found in BMI and %fat mass, between BBP and S with relation to LDR (p<0.001). In relation to the effect of aging on body composition, the muscle mass is reduced in all groups controlled (LDR, BBP, and S). Additionally, the %fat mass is increased only in S group (p< 0.05). The CMJ performance is significantly reduced only in S group (-0.07 m, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that the LDR as a model of active aging showed healthier values in BMI and %fat mass as well as greater results in QoL than BBP and S groups. Nevertheless, the LDR group showed similar values to S ones in muscle mass. The regression analysis performed showed that the sedentary habit predicts the %fat mass and CMJ performance.

摘要

目的

分析老年运动员(>35岁)相对于久坐不动者(S)的身体成分、力量水平以及与健康相关的生活质量(QoL),并比较两种运动模式(长跑运动员(LDR)和健美运动员(BBP))在上述变量上的结果。

方法

148名男性参与者参与并被分为三组:47名长跑运动员(年龄=42.01±6.96岁),49名健美运动员(年龄=45.14±7.04岁),以及47名久坐不动者(年龄=43.71±8.75岁)。评估身体成分、上肢和下肢力量水平以及生活质量。

结果

长跑运动员和健美运动员在反向纵跳(CMJ)中的表现优于久坐不动者(+0.06米,p<0.001)。在体重指数(BMI)和体脂百分比方面,健美运动员与久坐不动者相比,相对于长跑运动员存在显著差异(p<0.001)。关于衰老对身体成分的影响,所有对照组(长跑运动员、健美运动员和久坐不动者)的肌肉量均减少。此外,仅久坐不动者组的体脂百分比增加(p<0.05)。仅久坐不动者组的CMJ表现显著降低(-0.07米,p<0.001)。

结论

结果表明,作为积极老龄化模式的长跑运动员在BMI和体脂百分比方面显示出更健康的值,并且在生活质量方面比健美运动员和久坐不动者组有更好的结果。然而,长跑运动员组在肌肉量方面与久坐不动者组的值相似。进行的回归分析表明,久坐习惯可预测体脂百分比和CMJ表现。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis between two models of active aging and its influence on body composition, strength levels and quality of life: long-distance runners versus bodybuilders practitioners.两种积极老龄化模式之间的比较分析及其对身体成分、力量水平和生活质量的影响:长跑运动员与健美运动员。
Nutr Hosp. 2015 Apr 1;31(4):1717-25. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.31.4.8479.
2
Aging and factors related to running economy.衰老与跑步经济相关因素。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Nov;25(11):2971-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212dd0e.
3
Associations of maximal strength and muscular endurance test scores with cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition.最大力量和肌肉耐力测试得分与心肺功能和身体成分的关联。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Aug;26(8):2078-86. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823b06ff.
4
The effects of phosphatidic acid supplementation on strength, body composition, muscular endurance, power, agility, and vertical jump in resistance trained men.补充磷脂酸对进行抗阻训练男性的力量、身体成分、肌肉耐力、功率、敏捷性和垂直纵跳的影响。
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2016 Jun 2;13:24. doi: 10.1186/s12970-016-0135-x. eCollection 2016.
5
Body composition and two-compartment model assumptions in male long distance runners.男性长跑运动员的身体成分及两室模型假设
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Mar;26(3):392-7.
6
Similarity in adaptations to high-resistance circuit vs. traditional strength training in resistance-trained men.抗阻训练男性对高阻力回路适应与传统力量训练的相似性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Sep;25(9):2519-27. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182023a51.
7
Upper arm circumference is associated with race performance in ultra-endurance runners.上臂围与超级耐力跑者的比赛成绩相关。
Br J Sports Med. 2008 Apr;42(4):295-9; discussion 299. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.038570. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
8
Relationship between countermovement jump performance and multijoint isometric and dynamic tests of strength.反向运动跳跃表现与多关节等长和动态力量测试之间的关系。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):699-707. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816d5eda.
9
Influence of strength training on adult women's flexibility.力量训练对成年女性柔韧性的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):672-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a5d45.
10
Effects of a concurrent strength and endurance training on running performance and running economy in recreational marathon runners.抗阻和耐力训练对大众马拉松跑者跑步表现和跑步经济性的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Oct;24(10):2770-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d64e9c.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Abdominal Muscle Thickness, Strength, and Endurance in Persons Who Are Runners, Active, and Inactive.跑步者、活跃者和不活跃者的腹部肌肉厚度、力量和耐力的差异。
Sports Health. 2024 Nov-Dec;16(6):950-957. doi: 10.1177/19417381231212471. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
2
An Increase in Fat Mass Index Predicts a Deterioration of Running Speed.体脂指数增加预示着跑步速度的下降。
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 25;11(3):701. doi: 10.3390/nu11030701.
3
Obesity and related consequences to ageing.肥胖及其与衰老相关的后果。
Age (Dordr). 2016 Feb;38(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11357-016-9884-3. Epub 2016 Feb 4.