Mann Thomas C, Ferguson Melissa J
Department of Psychology.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jun;108(6):823-49. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000021. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
Little work has examined whether implicit evaluations can be effectively "undone" after learning new revelations. Across 7 experiments, participants fully reversed their implicit evaluation of a novel target person after reinterpreting earlier information. Revision occurred across multiple implicit evaluation measures (Experiments 1a and 1b), and only when the new information prompted a reinterpretation of prior learning versus did not (Experiment 2). The updating required active consideration of the information, as it emerged only with at least moderate cognitive resources (Experiment 3). Self-reported reinterpretation predicted (Experiment 4) and mediated (Experiment 5) revised implicit evaluations beyond the separate influence of how thoughtfully participants considered the new information in general. Finally, the revised evaluations were durable 3 days later (Experiment 6). We discuss how these results inform existing theoretical models, and consider implications for future research.
很少有研究探讨在了解到新的启示后,内隐评价是否能被有效“消除”。在7个实验中,参与者在重新解释早期信息后,完全扭转了对一个新目标人物的内隐评价。这种修正出现在多种内隐评价测量中(实验1a和1b),并且仅当新信息促使对先前学习内容进行重新解释时才会出现,反之则不会(实验2)。这种更新需要积极考虑信息,因为它仅在至少有适度认知资源的情况下才会出现(实验3)。自我报告的重新解释能够预测(实验4)并介导(实验5)修正后的内隐评价,这超出了参与者总体上对新信息思考程度的单独影响。最后,修正后的评价在3天后仍然持久(实验6)。我们讨论了这些结果如何为现有的理论模型提供信息,并考虑了对未来研究的启示。