• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农田鸟类群落对受空间聚集影响的农业集约化程度的响应。

The response of farmland bird communities to agricultural intensity as influenced by its spatial aggregation.

作者信息

Teillard Félix, Jiguet Frédéric, Tichit Muriel

机构信息

INRA-AgroParisTech, UMR 1048 SAD APT, Paris, France.

MNHN-CNRS-UPMC, UMR 7204 CRBPO, Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0119674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119674. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0119674
PMID:25799552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4370717/
Abstract

The shape of the relationship between biodiversity and agricultural intensity determines the range of intensities that should be targeted by conservation policies to obtain the greatest environmental benefits. Although preliminary evidence of this relationship exists, the influence of the spatial arrangement of intensity on biodiversity remains untested. We conducted a nationwide study linking agricultural intensity and its spatial arrangement to a farmland bird community of 22 species. Intensity was described with a continuous indicator based on Input Cost per hectare, which was relevant for both livestock and crop production. We used the French Breeding Bird Survey to compute several descriptors of the farmland bird community along the intensity gradient and tested for the significance of an interaction effect between intensity and its spatial aggregation on these descriptors. We found that the bird community was comprised of both winner and loser species with regard to intensity. The community composition descriptors (trophic level, specialisation, and specialisation for grassland indices) displayed non-linear relationships to intensity, with steeper slopes in the lower intensity range. We found a significant interaction effect between intensity and its spatial aggregation on the grassland specialisation index of the bird community; the effect of agricultural intensity was strengthened by its spatial aggregation. We suggest that an opportunity to improve the effectiveness of conservation policies exists by targeting measures in areas where intensity is moderate to low and aggregated. The effect of the aggregation of agricultural intensity on biodiversity should be considered in other scales and taxa when developing optimal policy targeting and intensity allocation strategies.

摘要

生物多样性与农业集约化之间关系的形态决定了保护政策应针对的集约化范围,以获取最大的环境效益。尽管这种关系已有初步证据,但集约化的空间布局对生物多样性的影响仍未得到验证。我们开展了一项全国性研究,将农业集约化及其空间布局与一个包含22个物种的农田鸟类群落联系起来。集约化用基于每公顷投入成本的连续指标来描述,这对畜牧和作物生产均适用。我们利用法国繁殖鸟类调查来计算沿集约化梯度的农田鸟类群落的几个描述指标,并检验集约化及其空间聚集对这些指标的交互作用效应的显著性。我们发现,就集约化而言,鸟类群落既包含受益物种也包含受损物种。群落组成描述指标(营养级、专业化程度以及草地专业化指数)与集约化呈现非线性关系,在较低集约化范围内斜率更陡。我们发现集约化及其空间聚集对鸟类群落的草地专业化指数存在显著的交互作用效应;农业集约化的效应因空间聚集而增强。我们建议,通过在集约化程度为中度至低度且呈聚集状态的地区实施针对性措施,存在提高保护政策有效性的机会。在制定最优政策目标和集约化分配策略时,应在其他尺度和分类群中考虑农业集约化聚集对生物多样性的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6364/4370717/f792e9cf9151/pone.0119674.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6364/4370717/a4d5a644f213/pone.0119674.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6364/4370717/bad5f7438148/pone.0119674.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6364/4370717/f792e9cf9151/pone.0119674.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6364/4370717/a4d5a644f213/pone.0119674.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6364/4370717/bad5f7438148/pone.0119674.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6364/4370717/f792e9cf9151/pone.0119674.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The response of farmland bird communities to agricultural intensity as influenced by its spatial aggregation.农田鸟类群落对受空间聚集影响的农业集约化程度的响应。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0119674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119674. eCollection 2015.
2
Contrasting spatial and temporal responses of bird communities to landscape changes.鸟类群落对景观变化的时空响应对比。
Oecologia. 2013 Jun;172(2):563-74. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2498-2. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
3
Alternative scenarios of bioenergy crop production in an agricultural landscape and implications for bird communities.农业景观中生物能源作物生产的替代方案及其对鸟类群落的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Jan;26(1):42-54. doi: 10.1890/14-1490.
4
Landscape heterogeneity rather than crop diversity mediates bird diversity in agricultural landscapes.景观异质性而非作物多样性在农业景观中调节鸟类多样性。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):e0200438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200438. eCollection 2018.
5
Landscape-level heterogeneity of agri-environment measures improves habitat suitability for farmland birds.农业环境措施的景观水平异质性提高了农田鸟类的栖息地适宜性。
Ecol Appl. 2023 Jan;33(1):e2720. doi: 10.1002/eap.2720. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
Landscape-scale conservation mitigates the biodiversity loss of grassland birds.景观尺度的保护可以减轻草原鸟类的生物多样性丧失。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Apr;32(3):e2548. doi: 10.1002/eap.2548. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
7
Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows.声学方法作为农业草地鸟类生物多样性监测中替代基于人工的调查方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 8;17(4):e0266557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266557. eCollection 2022.
8
Accelerated farmland bird population declines in European countries after their recent EU accession.欧洲国家在近期加入欧盟后,其农田鸟类数量加速减少。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Oct 10;946:174281. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174281. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
9
Environmental Factors Affecting Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Crop-Exploiting Species: Implications for Coexistence Between Agricultural Production and Avifauna Conservation in Wetlands.环境因素对作物利用物种时空分布的影响:对湿地农业生产与鸟类保护共存的启示。
Environ Manage. 2024 Oct;74(4):664-683. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-02028-7. Epub 2024 Aug 4.
10
Low-intensity agricultural landscapes in Transylvania support high butterfly diversity: implications for conservation.特兰西瓦尼亚的低强度农业景观支持着丰富的蝴蝶多样性:对保护工作的启示。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 24;9(7):e103256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103256. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial-Temporal Differentiation Analysis of Agricultural Land Use Intensity and Its Driving Factors at the County Scale: A Case Study in Hubei Province, China.县域尺度下农业土地利用强度的时空分异及其驱动因素分析——以湖北省为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 21;17(18):6910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186910.
2
Do Farmers Using Conventional and Non-Conventional Systems of Agriculture Have Different Perceptions of the Diversity of Wild Birds? Implications for Conservation.采用传统和非传统农业系统的农民对野生鸟类多样性的认知是否存在差异?对保护工作的启示。
PLoS One. 2016 May 31;11(5):e0156307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156307. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of Agroecological Matrix in a Tropical Montane Landscape: Ants in Coffee Plantations in Southern Mexico.热带山地景观中农业生态基质的质量:墨西哥南部咖啡种植园中的蚂蚁
Conserv Biol. 2002 Feb;16(1):174-182. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99536.x.
2
The effects of long-term nitrogen loading on grassland insect communities.长期氮负荷对草原昆虫群落的影响。
Oecologia. 2000 Jul;124(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s004420050026.
3
Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations.食虫鸟类数量减少与新烟碱类浓度高有关。
Nature. 2014 Jul 17;511(7509):341-3. doi: 10.1038/nature13531. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
4
A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity.一个用于分析和衡量土地利用强度的概念框架。
Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2013 Oct;5(5):464-470. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.010.
5
Conserving the birds of Uganda's banana-coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared.保护乌干达香蕉-咖啡弧的鸟类:土地节约与土地共享的比较。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054597. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
6
Conservation: limits of land sparing.保护:土地节约的限度
Science. 2011 Nov 4;334(6056):593; author reply 594-5. doi: 10.1126/science.334.6056.593-a.
7
Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared.协调粮食生产与生物多样性保护:土地共享与土地分离的比较。
Science. 2011 Sep 2;333(6047):1289-91. doi: 10.1126/science.1208742.
8
Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis.景观调节的农业环境管理对生物多样性的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 22;278(1713):1894-902. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1923. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
9
Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.农业景观中的功能景观异质性与动物生物多样性。
Ecol Lett. 2011 Feb;14(2):101-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
10
Spatial targeting of agri-environmental measures: cost-effectiveness and distributional consequences.农业环境措施的空间靶向:成本效益和分配后果。
Environ Manage. 2010 Sep;46(3):494-509. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9518-y. Epub 2010 Jul 8.