Barrantes-Vidal Neus, Grant Phillip, Kwapil Thomas R
Departament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC; Centre for Biomedical Research Network on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Sant Pere Claver - Fundació Sanitària, Barcelona, Spain;
Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S408-16. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu191.
Schizotypy provides a useful construct for understanding the development of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. As research on the epidemiology of psychotic symptoms and clinical risk for psychosis has expanded, conceptual challenges have emerged to comprehend the nature and borders of the space comprised between personality variation and psychosis. Schizotypy is considered in light of these more recent constructs. It is suggested that rather than being superseded by them due to their higher specificity and predictive power for transition to psychosis, schizotypy integrates them as it constitutes a dynamic continuum ranging from personality to psychosis. The advantages of schizotypy for studying schizophrenia etiology are discussed (eg, it facilitates a developmental approach and the identification of causal, resilience, and compensating factors and offers a multidimensional structure that captures etiological heterogeneity). An overview of putative genetic, biological, and psychosocial risk factors is presented, focusing on communalities and differences between schizotypy and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The found notable overlap supports etiological continuity, and, simultaneously, differential findings appear that are critical to understanding resilience to schizophrenia. For example, discrepant findings in genetic studies might be interpreted as suggestive of sets of independent genetic factors playing a differential role in schizotypy and schizophrenia: some would influence variation specifically on schizotypy dimensions (ie, high vs low schizotypy, thereby increasing proneness to psychosis), some would confer unspecific liability to disease by impacting neural properties and susceptibility to environmental factors (ie, high vs low resilience to disorder) and some might contribute to disease-specific characteristics. Finally, schizotypy's promise for studying gene-environment interactions is considered.
精神分裂型人格特质为理解精神分裂症谱系障碍的发展提供了一个有用的概念框架。随着对精神病性症状流行病学及精神病临床风险研究的扩展,在理解人格变异与精神病之间空间的本质和界限方面出现了概念上的挑战。鉴于这些更新的概念框架来考虑精神分裂型人格特质。有人认为,精神分裂型人格特质并非因其对向精神病转变具有更高的特异性和预测力而被这些概念框架所取代,而是将它们整合其中,因为它构成了一个从人格到精神病的动态连续体。讨论了精神分裂型人格特质在研究精神分裂症病因方面的优势(例如,它有助于采用发展性方法,识别因果、复原力和补偿因素,并提供一个捕捉病因异质性的多维结构)。本文概述了假定的遗传、生物学和心理社会风险因素,重点关注精神分裂型人格特质与精神分裂症谱系障碍之间的共性和差异。所发现的显著重叠支持病因连续性,同时也出现了对理解精神分裂症复原力至关重要的差异发现。例如,基因研究中的差异发现可能被解释为暗示了几组独立的遗传因素在精神分裂型人格特质和精神分裂症中发挥不同作用:一些因素会专门影响精神分裂型人格特质维度上的变异(即高精神分裂型人格特质与低精神分裂型人格特质,从而增加患精神病的倾向),一些因素会通过影响神经特性和对环境因素的易感性赋予非特异性疾病易感性(即对疾病的高复原力与低复原力),还有一些因素可能导致疾病特异性特征。最后,考虑了精神分裂型人格特质在研究基因 - 环境相互作用方面的前景。