Tripathy Shreejoy J, Burton Shawn D, Geramita Matthew, Gerkin Richard C, Urban Nathaniel N
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Program in Neural Computation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun 1;113(10):3474-89. doi: 10.1152/jn.00237.2015. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
For decades, neurophysiologists have characterized the biophysical properties of a rich diversity of neuron types. However, identifying common features and computational roles shared across neuron types is made more difficult by inconsistent conventions for collecting and reporting biophysical data. Here, we leverage NeuroElectro, a literature-based database of electrophysiological properties (www.neuroelectro.org), to better understand neuronal diversity, both within and across neuron types, and the confounding influences of methodological variability. We show that experimental conditions (e.g., electrode types, recording temperatures, or animal age) can explain a substantial degree of the literature-reported biophysical variability observed within a neuron type. Critically, accounting for experimental metadata enables massive cross-study data normalization and reveals that electrophysiological data are far more reproducible across laboratories than previously appreciated. Using this normalized dataset, we find that neuron types throughout the brain cluster by biophysical properties into six to nine superclasses. These classes include intuitive clusters, such as fast-spiking basket cells, as well as previously unrecognized clusters, including a novel class of cortical and olfactory bulb interneurons that exhibit persistent activity at theta-band frequencies.
几十年来,神经生理学家一直在描述丰富多样的神经元类型的生物物理特性。然而,由于收集和报告生物物理数据的惯例不一致,识别不同神经元类型共有的共同特征和计算作用变得更加困难。在这里,我们利用NeuroElectro,一个基于文献的电生理特性数据库(www.neuroelectro.org),来更好地理解神经元多样性,包括在神经元类型内部和不同神经元类型之间,以及方法学变异性的混杂影响。我们表明,实验条件(例如电极类型、记录温度或动物年龄)可以解释在一种神经元类型中观察到的文献报道的生物物理变异性的很大程度。至关重要的是,考虑实验元数据能够实现大规模的跨研究数据归一化,并揭示电生理数据在不同实验室之间的可重复性远比之前认为的要高。使用这个归一化数据集,我们发现整个大脑中的神经元类型根据生物物理特性聚集成六到九个超类。这些类别包括直观的聚类,如快速放电篮状细胞,以及以前未被识别的聚类,包括一类新的皮质和嗅球中间神经元,它们在θ波段频率表现出持续活动。