Bunya Vatinee Y, Fuerst Nicole M, Pistilli Maxwell, McCabe Bridgette E, Salvo Rebecca, Macchi Ilaria, Ying Gui-Shuang, Massaro-Giordano Mina
Department of Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Campus Biomedico University, Rome, Italy.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;133(6):662-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0429.
Knowledge about the variability of measurements using the TearLab Osmolarity System is necessary when evaluating the clinical utility of readings.
To examine the variability of tear osmolarity measured by the TearLab Osmolarity System in patients with Sjögren syndrome (SS), patients with blepharitis, and control participants.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study at a tertiary care academic center from June 13, 2012, to March 21, 2013. Participants included 74 eyes of 37 patients from a volunteer sample (18 patients with SS, 11 patients with blepharitis, and 8 control participants) who were evaluated using the TearLab Osmolarity System, with 3 consecutive osmolarity measurements taken at 1-minute intervals in a session; 15 of these patients had the same measurements taken by the same examiner in 2 additional sessions on the same day (9 AM-10 AM, 12 PM-1 PM, or 3 PM-4 PM). Most patients with SS and patients with blepharitis were taking systemic or topical dry eye medications at the time of enrollment.
Mean osmolarity and its variability calculated from a linear mixed model for each disease group that accounts for the variations attributable to different patients, eyes, and sessions and measurement error specific to each disease group.
Mean tear osmolarity was 307 mOsm/L, 304 mOsm/L, and 301 mOsm/L in the SS, blepharitis, and control groups, respectively (P = .46). The error associated with repeated measurements within a session in the patients without dry eye (10.5 mOsm/L [95% CI, 9.0-12.4]) was significantly lower than in the patients with blepharitis (14.6 mOsm/L [95% CI, 12.5-17.5]; P = .006) and patients with SS (15.8 mOsm/L [95% CI, 14.2-17.8]; P < .001) but a difference in the error of repeated measurements between patients with blepharitis and patients with SS was not identified (P = .46).
There was increased variability attributable to error in repeated measurements in patients with SS and patients with blepharitis compared with control participants. The high variability of TearLab osmolarity readings in all groups makes the clinical interpretation of measurements unclear.
在评估泪液渗透压系统测量结果的临床实用性时,了解该系统测量值的变异性很有必要。
研究泪液渗透压系统测量干燥综合征(SS)患者、睑缘炎患者及对照者泪液渗透压的变异性。
设计、地点和参与者:2012年6月13日至2013年3月21日在一家三级医疗学术中心进行的横断面研究。参与者包括来自志愿者样本的37例患者的74只眼(18例SS患者、11例睑缘炎患者和8例对照者),使用泪液渗透压系统进行评估,在一次检查中每隔1分钟连续测量3次渗透压;其中15例患者由同一名检查者在同一天的另外2次检查中(上午9点至10点、中午12点至下午1点或下午3点至4点)进行相同测量。大多数SS患者和睑缘炎患者在入组时正在服用全身性或局部性干眼药物。
根据线性混合模型计算每个疾病组的平均渗透压及其变异性,该模型考虑了不同患者、眼睛和检查以及每个疾病组特有的测量误差导致的变异。
SS组、睑缘炎组和对照组的平均泪液渗透压分别为307mOsm/L、304mOsm/L和301mOsm/L(P = 0.46)。无干眼患者一次检查内重复测量的误差(10.5mOsm/L[95%CI,9.0 - 12.4])显著低于睑缘炎患者(14.6mOsm/L[95%CI,12.5 - 17.5];P = 0.006)和SS患者(15.8mOsm/L[95%CI,14.2 - 17.8];P < 0.001),但未发现睑缘炎患者和SS患者重复测量误差的差异(P = (此处原文有误,应为P = 0.46))。
与对照者相比,SS患者和睑缘炎患者重复测量误差导致的变异性增加。所有组中泪液渗透压系统读数的高变异性使得测量结果的临床解读不明确。