Korshøj Mette, Lidegaard Mark, Kittel France, Van Herck Koen, De Backer Guy, De Bacquer Dirk, Holtermann Andreas, Clays Els
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0121729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121729. eCollection 2015.
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between average 24-hour ambulatory heart rate and all-cause mortality, while adjusting for resting clinical heart rate, cardiorespiratory fitness, occupational and leisure time physical activity as well as classical risk factors. A group of 439 middle-aged male workers free of baseline coronary heart disease from the Belgian Physical Fitness Study was included in the analysis. Data were collected by questionnaires and clinical examinations from 1976 to 1978. All-cause mortality was collected from the national mortality registration with a mean follow-up period of 16.5 years, with a total of 48 events. After adjustment for all before mentioned confounders in a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, a significant increased risk for all-cause mortality was found among the tertile of workers with highest average ambulatory heart rate compared to the tertile with lowest ambulatory heart rate (Hazard ratio = 3.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-8.44). No significant independent association was found between resting clinic heart rate and all-cause mortality. The study indicates that average 24-hour ambulatory heart rate is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality independent from resting clinic heart rate, cardiorespiratory fitness, occupational and leisure time physical activity and other classical risk factors among healthy middle-aged workers.
本研究旨在探讨24小时动态平均心率与全因死亡率之间的关联,同时对静息临床心率、心肺适能、职业和休闲时间体力活动以及经典危险因素进行校正。分析纳入了比利时体能研究中439名无基线冠心病的中年男性工人。1976年至1978年通过问卷调查和临床检查收集数据。全因死亡率从国家死亡率登记处收集,平均随访期为16.5年,共有48例死亡事件。在Cox比例风险回归分析中对上述所有混杂因素进行校正后,发现平均动态心率最高三分位数的工人与最低三分位数的工人相比,全因死亡率风险显著增加(风险比=3.21,95%置信区间:1.22-8.44)。静息临床心率与全因死亡率之间未发现显著的独立关联。该研究表明,在健康中年工人中,24小时动态平均心率是全因死亡率的有力预测指标,独立于静息临床心率、心肺适能、职业和休闲时间体力活动以及其他经典危险因素。