Atkinson Sarah
Centre for Medical Humanities, c/o Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE UK.
Topoi (Dordr). 2013;32(2):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s11245-013-9164-0.
Despite multiple axes of variation in defining wellbeing, the paper argues for the dominance of a 'components approach' in current research and practice. This approach builds on a well-established tradition within the social sciences of attending to categories whether for their identification, their value or their meanings and political resonance. The paper critiques the components approach and explores how to move beyond it towards conceptually integrating the various categories and dimensions through a relational and situated account of wellbeing. Drawing on more fluid social sciences, wellbeing is framed as an effect, dependent on the mobilisation of resources from everyday encounters with complex assemblages of people, things and places. Through such a framing, wellbeing can be conceived of as stable and amenable to change, as individual and collective and as subjective and objective. Policy interventions then need to attend to the relationalities of particular social and spatial contexts.
尽管在界定幸福方面存在多个变化轴,但本文主张在当前研究和实践中“构成要素法”占主导地位。这种方法建立在社会科学中一个既定的传统之上,即关注类别,无论是为了识别、价值、意义还是政治共鸣。本文对构成要素法提出批评,并探讨如何超越它,通过对幸福进行关系性和情境化的阐述,从概念上整合各种类别和维度。借鉴更具流动性的社会科学,幸福被界定为一种效应,它依赖于从与人和物以及场所的复杂组合的日常接触中调动资源。通过这样一种界定,幸福可以被视为稳定且易于改变的,既是个体的也是集体的,既是主观的也是客观的。政策干预则需要关注特定社会和空间背景的关系性。