Suppr超能文献

养老院获得性肺炎的死亡率预测因素:一项系统综述

Predictors of mortality for nursing home-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review.

作者信息

Dhawan Naveen, Pandya Naushira, Khalili Michael, Bautista Manuel, Duggal Anurag, Bahl Jaya, Gupta Vineet

机构信息

Nova Southeastern University Health Sciences Division, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA.

The Commonwealth Medical College, Scranton, PA 18509, USA.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:285983. doi: 10.1155/2015/285983. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current risk stratification tools, primarily used for CAP, are suboptimal in predicting nursing home acquired pneumonia (NHAP) outcome and mortality. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate current evidence on the usefulness of proposed predictors of NHAP mortality.

METHODS

PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and CINAHL databases were searched for articles published in English between January 1978 and January 2014. The literature search elicited a total of 666 references; 580 were excluded and 20 articles met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis.

RESULTS

More studies supported the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) as a superior predictor of NHAP severity. Fewer studies suggested CURB-65 and SOAR (especially for the need of ICU care) as useful predictors for NHAP mortality. There is weak evidence for biomarkers like C-reactive protein and copeptin as prognostic tools.

CONCLUSION

The evidence supports the use of PSI as the best available indicator while CURB-65 may be an alternative prognostic indicator for NHAP mortality. Overall, due to the paucity of information, biomarkers may not be as effective in this role. Larger prospective studies are needed to establish the most effective predictor(s) or combination scheme to help clinicians in decision-making related to NHAP mortality.

摘要

背景

目前主要用于社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的风险分层工具,在预测养老院获得性肺炎(NHAP)的预后和死亡率方面并不理想。我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估目前关于NHAP死亡率预测指标有用性的证据。

方法

检索PubMed(MEDLINE)、EMBASE和CINAHL数据库,查找1978年1月至2014年1月期间发表的英文文章。文献检索共得到666篇参考文献;排除580篇,20篇文章符合最终分析的纳入标准。

结果

更多研究支持肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)作为NHAP严重程度的更佳预测指标。较少研究表明CURB-65和SOAR(尤其是对于重症监护病房护理需求)是NHAP死亡率的有用预测指标。作为预后工具,C反应蛋白和 copeptin等生物标志物的证据不足。

结论

证据支持将PSI作为最佳可用指标,而CURB-65可能是NHAP死亡率的替代预后指标。总体而言,由于信息匮乏,生物标志物在这方面可能效果不佳。需要开展更大规模的前瞻性研究,以确定最有效的预测指标或组合方案,帮助临床医生做出与NHAP死亡率相关的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c29/4363502/a5904ef83e18/BMRI2015-285983.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验