Minges Karl E, Owen Neville, Salmon Jo, Chao Ariana, Dunstan David W, Whittemore Robin
School of Nursing, Yale University.
Behavioural Epidemiology Laboratory, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute.
Health Psychol. 2015 Apr;34(4):381-97. doi: 10.1037/hea0000172.
An integrated perspective on the relevant qualitative findings on the experience of screen time in youth can inform the development of hypotheses to be tested in future research and can guide the development of interventions to decrease sedentary behavior. The purpose of this qualitative metasynthesis was to explore parent, youth, and educational professionals' perceptions of barriers to, and facilitators of, reducing youth screen time.
Qualitative metasynthesis techniques were used to analyze and synthesize 15 qualitative studies of screen time among youth (11-18 years) meeting inclusion criteria. The phrases, quotes, and/or author interpretations (i.e., theme or subtheme) were recorded in a data display matrix to facilitate article comparisons. Codes were collapsed into 23 categories of similar conceptual meaning and 3 overarching themes were derived using thematic analysis procedures.
Study sample sizes ranged from 6 to 270 participants from 6 countries. Data collection methods included focus groups (n = 6), interviews (n = 4), focus group and interviews (n = 4), and naturalistic observation (n = 1) with youth and/or parents. Data analysis techniques included thematic analysis (n = 9), content analysis (n = 3), grounded theory (n = 1), observation (n = 1), and interpretive phenomenological analysis (n = 1). Three thematic categories were identified: (a) youth's norms-screen time is an integral part of daily life, and facilitates opportunities for entertainment, social interaction, and escapism; (b) family dynamics and parental roles-parents are conflicted and send mixed messages about the appropriate uses and amounts of screen time; and, (c) resources and environment-engagement in screen time is dependent on school, community, neighborhood, and home environmental contexts.
Screen time is an established norm in many youth cultures, presenting barriers to behavior change. Parents recognize the importance of reducing youth screen time, but model and promote engagement themselves. For youth and parents, mutually agreed rules, limits, and parental monitoring of screen time were perceived as likely to be effective.
对青少年屏幕使用时间体验的相关定性研究结果进行综合分析,可为未来研究中有待检验的假设提供依据,并指导减少久坐行为的干预措施的制定。本定性元分析的目的是探讨家长、青少年和教育专业人员对减少青少年屏幕使用时间的障碍和促进因素的看法。
采用定性元分析技术,对15项符合纳入标准的关于青少年(11 - 18岁)屏幕使用时间的定性研究进行分析和综合。短语、引语和/或作者的解释(即主题或子主题)记录在数据展示矩阵中,以方便文章比较。代码被归纳为23个具有相似概念意义的类别,并使用主题分析程序得出3个总体主题。
研究样本量从6个国家的6名至270名参与者不等。数据收集方法包括焦点小组(n = 6)、访谈(n = 4)、焦点小组和访谈(n = 4)以及对青少年和/或家长的自然观察(n = 1)。数据分析技术包括主题分析(n = 9)、内容分析(n = 3)、扎根理论(n = 1)、观察(n = 1)和解释现象学分析(n = 1)。确定了三个主题类别:(a)青少年的规范——屏幕使用时间是日常生活中不可或缺的一部分,为娱乐、社交互动和逃避现实提供了机会;(b)家庭动态和父母角色——父母意见不一,在屏幕使用时间的适当用途和时长方面传递出相互矛盾的信息;(c)资源与环境——屏幕使用时间取决于学校、社区、邻里和家庭环境背景。
在许多青少年文化中,屏幕使用时间已成为既定规范,这给行为改变带来了障碍。家长认识到减少青少年屏幕使用时间的重要性,但自己却树立并促进了屏幕使用行为。对于青少年和家长而言,双方共同认可的屏幕使用时间规则、限制和家长监督被认为可能有效。