Shamim Faisal, Ullah Hameed, Khan Fauzia A
Department of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):174-8. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.152874.
Several measurement tools have been used for assessment of postoperative pain in pediatric patients. Self-report methods have limitations in younger children and parent, nurse or physician assessment can be used as a surrogate measure. These tools should be tested in different cultures as pain can be influenced by sociocultural factors. The objective was to assess the inter-rater agreement on four different behavioral pain assessment scales in our local population.
This prospective, descriptive, observational study was conducted in Pakistan. American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II children, 3-7 years of age, undergoing elective surgery were enrolled. Four pain assessment scales were used, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS), Toddler Preschool Postoperative Pain Scale (TPPPS), objective pain scale (OPS), and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC). After 15 and 60 min of arrival in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), each child evaluated his/her postoperative pain by self-reporting and was also independently assessed by the PACU nurse, PACU anesthetist and the parent. The sensitivity and specificity of the responses of the four pain assessment scales were compared to the response of the child.
At 15 min, sensitivity and specificity were >60% for doctors and nurses on FLACC, OPS, and CHEOPS scales and for FLACC and CHEOPS scale for the parents. Parents showed poor agreement on OPS and TPPS. At 60 min, sensitivity was poor on the OPS scale by all three observers. Nurses showed a lower specificity on FLACC tool. Parents had poor specificity on CHEOPS and rate of false negatives was high with TPPS.
We recommend the use of FLACC scale for assessment by parents, nurses, and doctors in Pakistani children aged between 3 and 7.
已有多种测量工具用于评估小儿患者的术后疼痛。自我报告法在年幼儿童中存在局限性,可采用家长、护士或医生的评估作为替代测量方法。由于疼痛会受到社会文化因素的影响,这些工具应在不同文化中进行测试。目的是评估在我们当地人群中,四种不同行为疼痛评估量表的评分者间一致性。
本前瞻性、描述性观察性研究在巴基斯坦进行。纳入年龄在3至7岁、接受择期手术的美国麻醉医师协会I级和II级儿童。使用了四种疼痛评估量表,即安大略东部儿童医院疼痛量表(CHEOPS)、幼儿学龄前术后疼痛量表(TPPPS)、客观疼痛量表(OPS)以及面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安慰度(FLACC)量表。在进入麻醉后护理单元(PACU)15分钟和60分钟后,每个孩子通过自我报告评估其术后疼痛,同时PACU护士、PACU麻醉师和家长也对其进行独立评估。将四种疼痛评估量表的反应的敏感性和特异性与孩子的反应进行比较。
在15分钟时,FLACC、OPS和CHEOPS量表上医生和护士的敏感性和特异性均>60%,家长对FLACC和CHEOPS量表的敏感性和特异性也如此。家长对OPS和TPPS量表的一致性较差。在60分钟时,所有三位观察者对OPS量表的敏感性均较差。护士在FLACC工具上的特异性较低。家长在CHEOPS量表上的特异性较差,TPPS量表的假阴性率较高。
我们建议在巴基斯坦3至7岁儿童中,家长、护士和医生使用FLACC量表进行评估。