Ostro B D, Rothschild S
California Public Health Foundation, Berkeley 94704.
Environ Res. 1989 Dec;50(2):238-47. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(89)80004-0.
Recently there have been several attempts to estimate the health and economic effects of one or more airborne pollutants using the Health Interview Survey (HIS), a large cross-sectional database collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. The ultimate implications of these studies are unclear, however, since they frequently include different pollutants and health outcomes in the regression analysis. This paper attempts to determine the separate health consequences of two air pollutants common to the urban environment, ozone and particulate matter, using six separate years of the HIS. The results, using a fixed effects model that controls for intercity differences, indicate an association between smaller size particles (fine particulate) and both minor restrictions in activity and respiratory conditions severe enough to result in work loss and bed disability in adults. Ozone, on the other hand, appears to be associated only with the more minor restrictions. However, the measurement error associated with estimating exposure to ozone may limit the usefulness of the HIS which relies on a 2-week recall of health status. The results are compared with other studies using the HIS and related studies involving acute respiratory symptoms.
最近,有人试图利用健康访谈调查(HIS)来估算一种或多种空气污染物对健康和经济的影响。健康访谈调查是美国国家卫生统计中心收集的一个大型横断面数据库。然而,这些研究的最终影响尚不清楚,因为它们在回归分析中经常纳入不同的污染物和健康结果。本文试图利用健康访谈调查的六个不同年份的数据,确定城市环境中常见的两种空气污染物——臭氧和颗粒物——各自对健康的影响。使用控制城市间差异的固定效应模型得出的结果表明,较小尺寸的颗粒物(细颗粒物)与活动受限以及严重到足以导致成年人误工和卧床残疾的呼吸道疾病之间存在关联。另一方面,臭氧似乎仅与较轻微的活动受限有关。然而,与估算臭氧暴露相关的测量误差可能会限制依赖两周健康状况回忆的健康访谈调查的效用。本文将研究结果与其他使用健康访谈调查的研究以及涉及急性呼吸道症状的相关研究进行了比较。