Roldán-Alzate Alejandro, García-Rodríguez Sylvana, Anagnostopoulos Petros V, Srinivasan Shardha, Wieben Oliver, François Christopher J
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
J Biomech. 2015 May 1;48(7):1325-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Altered total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) hemodynamics can cause long-term complications. Patient-specific anatomy hinders generalized solutions. 4D Flow MRI allows in vivo assessment, but not predictions under varying conditions and surgical approaches. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) improves understanding and explores varying physiological conditions. This study investigated a combination of 4D Flow MRI and CFD to assess TCPC hemodynamics, accompanied with in vitro measurements as CFD validation. 4D Flow MRI was performed in extracardiac and atriopulmonary TCPC subjects. Data was processed for visualization and quantification of velocity and flow. Three-dimensional (3D) geometries were generated from angiography scans and used for CFD and a physical model construction through additive manufacturing. These models were connected to a perfusion system, circulating water through the vena cavae and exiting through the pulmonary arteries at two flow rates. Models underwent 4D Flow MRI and image processing. CFD simulated the in vitro system, applying two different inlet conditions from in vitro 4D Flow MRI measurements; no-slip was implemented at rigid walls. Velocity and flow were obtained and analyzed. The three approaches showed similar velocities, increasing proportionally with high inflow. Atriopulmonary TCPC presented higher vorticity compared to extracardiac at both inflow rates. Increased inflow balanced flow distribution in both TCPC cases. Atriopulmonary IVC flow participated in atrium recirculation, contributing to RPA outflow; at baseline, IVC flow preferentially traveled through the LPA. The combination of patient-specific in vitro and CFD allows hemodynamic parameter control, impossible in vivo. Physical models serve as CFD verification and fine-tuning tools.
全腔静脉肺动脉连接术(TCPC)血流动力学改变可导致长期并发症。个体特异性解剖结构阻碍了通用解决方案的制定。四维血流磁共振成像(4D Flow MRI)可进行体内评估,但无法预测不同条件和手术方式下的情况。计算流体动力学(CFD)有助于增进理解并探索不同的生理状况。本研究调查了4D Flow MRI与CFD相结合以评估TCPC血流动力学,并进行体外测量以验证CFD。对心外和心房肺动脉型TCPC受试者进行了4D Flow MRI检查。对数据进行处理以实现速度和流量的可视化及量化。从血管造影扫描生成三维(3D)几何模型,并用于CFD以及通过增材制造构建物理模型。这些模型连接到灌注系统,以两种流速使水通过腔静脉循环并从肺动脉流出。对模型进行4D Flow MRI和图像处理。CFD模拟体外系统,应用来自体外4D Flow MRI测量的两种不同入口条件;在刚性壁处采用无滑移边界条件。获取并分析速度和流量。三种方法显示出相似的速度,且随高流量成比例增加。在两种流速下,心房肺动脉型TCPC的涡度均高于心外型。增加流量可平衡两种TCPC病例中的血流分布。心房肺动脉型下腔静脉血流参与心房再循环,有助于右肺动脉流出;在基线时,下腔静脉血流优先通过左肺动脉。特定患者的体外模型与CFD相结合可实现血流动力学参数控制,这在体内是无法做到的。物理模型可作为CFD验证和微调工具。