Johnston A S A, Hodson M E, Thorbek P, Alvarez T, Sibly R M
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, UK.
Environment Department, University of York, UK.
Ecol Modell. 2014 May 24;280:5-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.012.
Earthworms are important organisms in soil communities and so are used as model organisms in environmental risk assessments of chemicals. However current risk assessments of soil invertebrates are based on short-term laboratory studies, of limited ecological relevance, supplemented if necessary by site-specific field trials, which sometimes are challenging to apply across the whole agricultural landscape. Here, we investigate whether population responses to environmental stressors and pesticide exposure can be accurately predicted by combining energy budget and agent-based models (ABMs), based on knowledge of how individuals respond to their local circumstances. A simple energy budget model was implemented within each earthworm in the ABM, based on a priori parameter estimates. From broadly accepted physiological principles, simple algorithms specify how energy acquisition and expenditure drive life cycle processes. Each individual allocates energy between maintenance, growth and/or reproduction under varying conditions of food density, soil temperature and soil moisture. When simulating published experiments, good model fits were obtained to experimental data on individual growth, reproduction and starvation. Using the energy budget model as a platform we developed methods to identify which of the physiological parameters in the energy budget model (rates of ingestion, maintenance, growth or reproduction) are primarily affected by pesticide applications, producing four hypotheses about how toxicity acts. We tested these hypotheses by comparing model outputs with published toxicity data on the effects of copper oxychloride and chlorpyrifos on . Both growth and reproduction were directly affected in experiments in which sufficient food was provided, whilst maintenance was targeted under food limitation. Although we only incorporate toxic effects at the individual level we show how ABMs can readily extrapolate to larger scales by providing good model fits to field population data. The ability of the presented model to fit the available field and laboratory data for demonstrates the promise of the agent-based approach in ecology, by showing how biological knowledge can be used to make ecological inferences. Further work is required to extend the approach to populations of more ecologically relevant species studied at the field scale. Such a model could help extrapolate from laboratory to field conditions and from one set of field conditions to another or from species to species.
蚯蚓是土壤群落中的重要生物,因此被用作化学物质环境风险评估的模式生物。然而,目前对土壤无脊椎动物的风险评估基于短期实验室研究,其生态相关性有限,必要时辅以特定地点的田间试验,而这些试验有时在整个农业景观中应用具有挑战性。在此,我们基于个体如何应对当地环境的知识,研究结合能量预算模型和基于主体的模型(ABM)是否能够准确预测种群对环境压力源和农药暴露的反应。基于先验参数估计,在ABM中的每条蚯蚓体内实施了一个简单的能量预算模型。根据广泛接受的生理原理,简单算法规定了能量获取和消耗如何驱动生命周期过程。每个个体在食物密度、土壤温度和土壤湿度的不同条件下,在维持、生长和/或繁殖之间分配能量。在模拟已发表的实验时,模型对个体生长、繁殖和饥饿的实验数据拟合良好。以能量预算模型为平台,我们开发了方法来确定能量预算模型中的哪些生理参数(摄食、维持、生长或繁殖速率)主要受农药施用的影响,从而产生了关于毒性作用方式的四个假设。我们通过将模型输出与已发表的关于氧氯化铜和毒死蜱对[具体对象未提及]影响的毒性数据进行比较,对这些假设进行了检验。在提供充足食物的实验中,生长和繁殖都受到直接影响,而在食物受限的情况下,维持则成为目标。尽管我们仅在个体层面纳入了毒性效应,但我们展示了ABM如何通过为田间种群数据提供良好的模型拟合,轻松外推到更大尺度。所提出的模型拟合现有田间和实验室数据的能力,通过展示如何利用生物学知识进行生态推断,证明了基于主体的方法在生态学中的前景。需要进一步开展工作,将该方法扩展到在田间尺度研究的更具生态相关性的物种种群。这样的模型有助于从实验室条件外推到田间条件,从一组田间条件外推到另一组田间条件,或从一个物种外推到另一个物种。