Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Institute of Latvian History, University of Latvia, Kalpaka Bulvāris 4, Rīga 1050, Latvia.
Curr Biol. 2017 Feb 20;27(4):576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.060. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
The Neolithic transition was a dynamic time in European prehistory of cultural, social, and technological change. Although this period has been well explored in central Europe using ancient nuclear DNA [1, 2], its genetic impact on northern and eastern parts of this continent has not been as extensively studied. To broaden our understanding of the Neolithic transition across Europe, we analyzed eight ancient genomes: six samples (four to ∼1- to 4-fold coverage) from a 3,500 year temporal transect (∼8,300-4,800 calibrated years before present) through the Baltic region dating from the Mesolithic to the Late Neolithic and two samples spanning the Mesolithic-Neolithic boundary from the Dnieper Rapids region of Ukraine. We find evidence that some hunter-gatherer ancestry persisted across the Neolithic transition in both regions. However, we also find signals consistent with influxes of non-local people, most likely from northern Eurasia and the Pontic Steppe. During the Late Neolithic, this Steppe-related impact coincides with the proposed emergence of Indo-European languages in the Baltic region [3, 4]. These influences are distinct from the early farmer admixture that transformed the genetic landscape of central Europe, suggesting that changes associated with the Neolithic package in the Baltic were not driven by the same Anatolian-sourced genetic exchange.
新石器时代的转型是欧洲史前时期文化、社会和技术变革的一个充满活力的时期。尽管这一时期在中欧地区已经通过古代核 DNA[1,2]得到了很好的研究,但它对欧洲北部和东部地区的遗传影响尚未得到广泛研究。为了更全面地了解欧洲的新石器时代转型,我们分析了 8 个古代基因组:6 个样本(4 个至约 1 至 4 倍覆盖度)来自波罗的海地区的 3500 年时间跨度(约公元前 8300 年至 4800 年),从新石器时代到晚期新石器时代,以及两个跨越乌克兰第聂伯河急流地区新石器时代-新石器时代边界的样本。我们发现,在这两个地区,一些狩猎采集者的遗传背景在新石器时代的转型中一直存在。然而,我们也发现了与非本地人群流入的信号,这些人很可能来自北欧亚大陆和顿涅茨草原。在晚石器时代,这种与草原有关的影响与波罗的海地区印欧语系的出现相吻合[3,4]。这些影响与改变中欧遗传景观的早期农民混合不同,这表明与波罗的海地区新石器时代转型相关的变化并不是由与安纳托利亚有关的基因交换所驱动的。